"Diagnose & Adios": Multi-Perspective Insights on Formal Service Use in Dementia Family Caregivers.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-05-10 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaf081
Francesca Falzarano, Annabelle Greenfield, Francesco Osso, Katerina Bumbalova, Rachel F Bloom
{"title":"\"Diagnose & Adios\": Multi-Perspective Insights on Formal Service Use in Dementia Family Caregivers.","authors":"Francesca Falzarano, Annabelle Greenfield, Francesco Osso, Katerina Bumbalova, Rachel F Bloom","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Dementia family caregiving is a complex role that becomes increasingly intense and demanding over time. The utilization of home and community-based services (HCBS) can provide knowledge and skills to foster preparedness, which may protect against adverse caregiving outcomes; yet actual uptake of services remains low. The current study aims to gather multi-perspective insights underlying the disconnect between caregivers' need for-versus utilization of-HCBS using Pearlin et al.'s (1990) stress process model as a guiding theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Five focus groups of 4-8 participants each were conducted with dementia family caregivers (n = 13) and subject matter experts (n = 17). A deductive-inductive thematic approach was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three overarching concepts were identified: \"Pathways to Preparedness'\", 'Multi-Level Barriers', and 'Bridging the Gap.' Findings reflected caregivers\" need for support in 4 core areas: (a) dementia-specific education/training; (b) competent mental health support; (c) financial/legal navigation, and (4) emergency readiness. Results revealed cross-dimensional barriers across individual-, provider-, and systemic-contexts impeding HCBS access and utilization. Personalized caregiving navigation and technology were deemed potential solutions to facilitate clearer clinical pathways between unmet needs and relevant services.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Results underscore the complexity of the HCBS system in the United States and highlight the multidimensional barriers disrupting the pipeline connecting caregivers to HCBS. Findings can inform web-based behavioral interventions aiming to enhance family caregivers' knowledge of, access to, and utilization of formal services in community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Dementia family caregiving is a complex role that becomes increasingly intense and demanding over time. The utilization of home and community-based services (HCBS) can provide knowledge and skills to foster preparedness, which may protect against adverse caregiving outcomes; yet actual uptake of services remains low. The current study aims to gather multi-perspective insights underlying the disconnect between caregivers' need for-versus utilization of-HCBS using Pearlin et al.'s (1990) stress process model as a guiding theoretical framework.

Research design and methods: Five focus groups of 4-8 participants each were conducted with dementia family caregivers (n = 13) and subject matter experts (n = 17). A deductive-inductive thematic approach was used for data analysis.

Results: Three overarching concepts were identified: "Pathways to Preparedness'", 'Multi-Level Barriers', and 'Bridging the Gap.' Findings reflected caregivers" need for support in 4 core areas: (a) dementia-specific education/training; (b) competent mental health support; (c) financial/legal navigation, and (4) emergency readiness. Results revealed cross-dimensional barriers across individual-, provider-, and systemic-contexts impeding HCBS access and utilization. Personalized caregiving navigation and technology were deemed potential solutions to facilitate clearer clinical pathways between unmet needs and relevant services.

Discussion and implications: Results underscore the complexity of the HCBS system in the United States and highlight the multidimensional barriers disrupting the pipeline connecting caregivers to HCBS. Findings can inform web-based behavioral interventions aiming to enhance family caregivers' knowledge of, access to, and utilization of formal services in community settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“诊断与告别”:痴呆症家庭照护者正式服务使用的多视角洞察。
背景和目的:痴呆症家庭护理是一项复杂的工作,随着时间的推移,其强度和要求越来越高。利用家庭和社区服务(HCBS)可以提供知识和技能,以促进准备,这可以防止不利的护理结果;然而,服务的实际使用率仍然很低。目前的研究旨在利用Pearlin等人(1990)的应激过程模型作为指导理论框架,收集照顾者对HCBS的需求与利用之间脱节的多角度见解。研究设计与方法:与痴呆家庭护理人员(n=13)和主题专家(n=17)进行5个焦点组,每组4-8人。数据分析采用演绎-归纳主题法。结果:确定了三个总体概念:“准备途径”、“多层次障碍”和“弥合差距”。调查结果反映了护理人员在四个核心领域的支持需求:1)痴呆症专项教育/培训;2)有能力的心理健康支持;3)财务/法律导航,4)应急准备。结果显示,个体、提供者和系统背景的跨维度障碍阻碍了HCBS的获取和利用。个性化护理导航和技术被认为是潜在的解决方案,有助于在未满足的需求和相关服务之间建立更清晰的临床路径。讨论和影响:结果强调了美国HCBS系统的复杂性,并强调了破坏连接护理人员与HCBS管道的多维障碍。研究结果可以为基于网络的行为干预提供信息,旨在提高家庭照顾者对社区环境中正规服务的了解、获取和利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Book review: Living Beyond Loss by Robert Neimeyer. Exploring the Cognitive Aspects of Walking in the Neighbourhoods among People Living with Dementia. Exploring Older Adults' Engagement with Socially-Assistive-Robots using AI: Personas, Patterns, and Psychosocial Outcomes. Navigating Late-Life Parental Care Transitions: Implications for Adult Children's Psychosocial Well-Being. Sentimental Value and the value of sentiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1