THE ROLE OF GLIOSIS IN IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANES: New Insights.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1097/IAE.0000000000004429
Alberto Quarta, Lucio Zeppa, Maria Ludovica Ruggeri, Matteo Gironi, Agbeanda Aharrh-Gnama, Marta Di Nicola, Annamaria Porreca, Francesco Matarazzo, Lisa Toto, Rodolfo Mastropasqua
{"title":"THE ROLE OF GLIOSIS IN IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANES: New Insights.","authors":"Alberto Quarta, Lucio Zeppa, Maria Ludovica Ruggeri, Matteo Gironi, Agbeanda Aharrh-Gnama, Marta Di Nicola, Annamaria Porreca, Francesco Matarazzo, Lisa Toto, Rodolfo Mastropasqua","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare cloudy and clear epiretinal membranes (ERMs) using Multicolor Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (MC-SLO) per stage and to assess gliotic components' impact on postoperative visual outcomes in patients undergoing surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline and 6-month measurements included Snellen acuity (SA), central retinal thickness (CRT), the presence of microcystic macular edema (MME), outer retinal cysts (ORCs), and disruptions of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and external limiting membrane (ELM). In addition, a quantitative analysis of gliosis using MC-SLO was performed. This study primarily evaluated postoperative SA improvement, CRT reduction, the prevalence of ERM remnants and inner retinal dimples. In addition, the relationship between gliotic components and postoperative outcomes was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Stage 2 ERMs, clear ERMs had a higher incidence of ERM remnants after surgery (81.8% vs. 30.8%, P = 0.037). Both groups experienced visual acuity improvement (clear ERMs: +25 ETDRS letter score, cloudy ERMs: +15 ETDRS letter score P = 0.013). In Stage 3 ERMs, no significant differences in SA or CRT changes were noted, but clear ERMs showed more inner retinal dimples ( P = 0.015). Gliosis area and EIFL thickness showed a significant correlation in cloudy Stage 3 ERMs ( P = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clear and cloudy ERMs differ in postoperative recovery. Cloudy Stage 2 ERMs have less functional recovery but fewer remnants than clear ERMs. In Stage 3, gliosis correlates with EIFL thickness, and clear ERMs exhibit more inner retinal dimples.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1117-1124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004429","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare cloudy and clear epiretinal membranes (ERMs) using Multicolor Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (MC-SLO) per stage and to assess gliotic components' impact on postoperative visual outcomes in patients undergoing surgery.

Methods: Baseline and 6-month measurements included Snellen acuity (SA), central retinal thickness (CRT), the presence of microcystic macular edema (MME), outer retinal cysts (ORCs), and disruptions of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and external limiting membrane (ELM). In addition, a quantitative analysis of gliosis using MC-SLO was performed. This study primarily evaluated postoperative SA improvement, CRT reduction, the prevalence of ERM remnants and inner retinal dimples. In addition, the relationship between gliotic components and postoperative outcomes was analyzed.

Results: In Stage 2 ERMs, clear ERMs had a higher incidence of ERM remnants after surgery (81.8% vs. 30.8%, P = 0.037). Both groups experienced visual acuity improvement (clear ERMs: +25 ETDRS letter score, cloudy ERMs: +15 ETDRS letter score P = 0.013). In Stage 3 ERMs, no significant differences in SA or CRT changes were noted, but clear ERMs showed more inner retinal dimples ( P = 0.015). Gliosis area and EIFL thickness showed a significant correlation in cloudy Stage 3 ERMs ( P = 0.011).

Conclusion: Clear and cloudy ERMs differ in postoperative recovery. Cloudy Stage 2 ERMs have less functional recovery but fewer remnants than clear ERMs. In Stage 3, gliosis correlates with EIFL thickness, and clear ERMs exhibit more inner retinal dimples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经胶质瘤在特发性视网膜上膜中的作用:新见解。
方法:对基线和6个月的测量包括Snellen视敏度(SA)、视网膜中央厚度(CRT)、微囊性黄斑水肿(MME)、视网膜外囊肿(ORC)、椭球区(EZ)和外限制膜(ELM)的存在情况进行分析,并对MC-SLO进行定量分析。该研究主要评估了术后SA改善、CRT减少和ERM残留的发生率。此外,还分析了胶质瘤成分与术后预后的关系。结果:在2期ERM中,明确ERM术后残余ERM发生率较高(81.8% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.037)。两组视力均有改善(清晰ERMs: +25 ETDRS字母评分,浑浊ERMs: +15 ETDRS字母评分p = 0.013)。在第3期erm中,SA和CRT的变化没有明显差异,但清晰的erm显示更多的视网膜内窝(p = 0.015)。浑浊期ERMs中胶质瘤面积与EIFL厚度呈显著相关(p = 0.011)。结论:透明和浑浊的erm在术后恢复方面存在差异。浑浊的2期erm功能恢复较少,但残留物较少。在第3期,胶质瘤与EIFL的严重程度相关,清晰的erm表现出更多的视网膜内窝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
期刊最新文献
Macular Hole-Related Retinal Detachment in Gyrate Atrophy. Reply. Reply. Correspondence. Correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1