Personalized baseline and residual TMTV influence treatment response and outcomes in relapsed/refractory lymphomas: results from the GATA study

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1007/s00259-025-07154-w
Solène Malmon, Olivier Casasnovas, Marguerite Fournier, Guillaume Cartron, Salim Kanoun, Anne Ségolène Cottereau, Charles Herbaux, Yassine Al Tabaa
{"title":"Personalized baseline and residual TMTV influence treatment response and outcomes in relapsed/refractory lymphomas: results from the GATA study","authors":"Solène Malmon, Olivier Casasnovas, Marguerite Fournier, Guillaume Cartron, Salim Kanoun, Anne Ségolène Cottereau, Charles Herbaux, Yassine Al Tabaa","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07154-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) at baseline becomes a key biomarker in several lymphoma subtypes. Variability in segmentation methods such as 41%SUVmax and SUVmax &gt; 4 has limited its clinical application. Additionally, immune-checkpoint-inhibitors introduced challenges in response assessment due to pseudoprogression, complicating the use of traditional metrics. This study investigates the prognostic impact of baseline- and residual-TMTV and introduces a novel personalized-liver-based-threshold (pTMTV<sub>liver</sub>) to enhance precision in patient stratification.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We analyzed 91 patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse-large-B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma from the GATA trial, comparing patient’s outcome according to three segmentation methods: TMTV<sub>41%</sub>, TMTV<sub>4</sub>, and pTMTV<sub>liver</sub>. pTMTV<sub>liver</sub> used a threshold of 200%SUVmean<sub>liver</sub> aligning with 125%SUVmax<sub>liver</sub> to enhance standardization and reduce variability.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Baseline-TMTV significantly influenced prognosis with higher TMTV correlating with shorter PFS and OS (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001 for all methods). Residual-TMTV, particularly with pTMTV<sub>liver</sub> and TMTV<sub>4</sub>, stratified no-CMR patients with the lowest predictive errors and better predictive accuracy compared to TMTV<sub>41%</sub> Multivariate analyses confirmed residual-pTMTV<sub>liver</sub> as superior for prognostic performance for PFS (HR:5.10; C-index:0.724) and OS (HR:4.00; C-index:0.853) compared to TMTV<sub>4</sub> and Deauville Score (DS). The DS alone did not fully capture the heterogeneity of outcomes of DS4-5 patients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Baseline- and residual-TMTV strongly influence prognosis and response in lymphoma patients. The novel personalized pTMTV<sub>liver</sub> method offers improved accuracy of patient stratification, particularly for those with DS4-5, providing more reliable risk assessment. Larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings and optimize residual-TMTV-based clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07154-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) at baseline becomes a key biomarker in several lymphoma subtypes. Variability in segmentation methods such as 41%SUVmax and SUVmax > 4 has limited its clinical application. Additionally, immune-checkpoint-inhibitors introduced challenges in response assessment due to pseudoprogression, complicating the use of traditional metrics. This study investigates the prognostic impact of baseline- and residual-TMTV and introduces a novel personalized-liver-based-threshold (pTMTVliver) to enhance precision in patient stratification.

Methods

We analyzed 91 patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse-large-B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma from the GATA trial, comparing patient’s outcome according to three segmentation methods: TMTV41%, TMTV4, and pTMTVliver. pTMTVliver used a threshold of 200%SUVmeanliver aligning with 125%SUVmaxliver to enhance standardization and reduce variability.

Results

Baseline-TMTV significantly influenced prognosis with higher TMTV correlating with shorter PFS and OS (p < 0.0001 for all methods). Residual-TMTV, particularly with pTMTVliver and TMTV4, stratified no-CMR patients with the lowest predictive errors and better predictive accuracy compared to TMTV41% Multivariate analyses confirmed residual-pTMTVliver as superior for prognostic performance for PFS (HR:5.10; C-index:0.724) and OS (HR:4.00; C-index:0.853) compared to TMTV4 and Deauville Score (DS). The DS alone did not fully capture the heterogeneity of outcomes of DS4-5 patients.

Conclusion

Baseline- and residual-TMTV strongly influence prognosis and response in lymphoma patients. The novel personalized pTMTVliver method offers improved accuracy of patient stratification, particularly for those with DS4-5, providing more reliable risk assessment. Larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings and optimize residual-TMTV-based clinical applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个性化基线和残留TMTV影响复发/难治性淋巴瘤的治疗反应和结果:来自GATA研究的结果
目的:总代谢肿瘤体积(TMTV)在基线时成为几种淋巴瘤亚型的关键生物标志物。分割方法的可变性,如41%SUVmax和SUVmax >; 4,限制了其临床应用。此外,由于假进展,免疫检查点抑制剂给反应评估带来了挑战,使传统指标的使用复杂化。本研究探讨了基线和剩余tmtv对预后的影响,并引入了一种新的基于肝脏的个性化阈值(pTMTVliver),以提高患者分层的准确性。方法分析91例GATA试验中复发/难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤和滤泡性淋巴瘤患者,根据TMTV41%、TMTV4和pTMTVliver三种分割方法比较患者的预后。pTMTVliver使用200%SUVmeanliver的阈值与125%SUVmaxliver对齐,以增强标准化并减少可变性。结果基线TMTV对预后有显著影响,较高的TMTV与较短的PFS和OS相关(所有方法p <; 0.0001)。与tmtv41相比,残差- tmtv,特别是pTMTVliver和TMTV4,分层无cmr患者的预测误差最低,预测准确性更高。C-index:0.724)和OS (HR:4.00;C-index:0.853)与TMTV4和Deauville Score (DS)比较。单独的DS并不能完全反映DS4-5患者结果的异质性。结论基线和残余tmtv对淋巴瘤患者的预后和反应有重要影响。新的个性化pTMTVliver方法提高了患者分层的准确性,特别是对于DS4-5患者,提供了更可靠的风险评估。需要更大的队列来验证这些发现并优化基于残余tmtv的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
期刊最新文献
coPERCIST: AI-assisted PET-CT response assessment. First αvβ6-integrin targeted radioligand therapy of breast cancer using Lu-177-Therahexin [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT in active surveillance: From imaging to informed decision-making - a "Whistling Arrow" perspective. An intra-patient contemporaneous comparison of 18F-piflufolastat and 18F-flotufolastat urinary radioactivity and pelvic region detection rates in men with low PSA biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Value of a repeat 18F-flotufolastat PET scan following a negative scan in patients with suspected biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1