Mario Augusto Lopes de Castro , Adam Saxty , Martyn Wright , Sean Murray
{"title":"Addressing and mitigating risks of failures in metals additive manufacturing concerning the maritime industry","authors":"Mario Augusto Lopes de Castro , Adam Saxty , Martyn Wright , Sean Murray","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Additive manufacturing (AM) arises as a promise to increase design freedom and hence to optimize equipment, as this uncages the manufacturing of more complex geometric shapes. Metal AM in the maritime industry is a process in early stages of development so caution- and consciousness are required when designing and reviewing processes (DRPs) are performed, since technological gaps represent a high risk for equipment structural resistance and life. Presented work researched some of most important technological gaps and failures within metals AM, lessons learned from past novel technologies, the environment in which the maritime industry is enclosed and respective common practices, concluding that <em>dichotomy</em> − decisions framed as binary choices of approval or rejection −, <em>fixed mindsets</em> − a belief that abilities and characteristics are static and unchangeable − and dependence of immature standards, guidelines and regulations represents a risk in terms of high potential of omissions. One of the challenges within mentioned ecosystem consists in improving internal processes and mindsets, both presenting necessary requirements to ensure safety of well-established technologies but also headlining gaps when under development ones are assessed. This publication suggests that the use of the new herein developed Cross-Hybrid Evaluations (CHP) in DRPs represents a significant leap towards safety insurance, increasing of reliability and reduction of barriers that hinders the plenty expansion of metal AM within maritime industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 109398"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630725001396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) arises as a promise to increase design freedom and hence to optimize equipment, as this uncages the manufacturing of more complex geometric shapes. Metal AM in the maritime industry is a process in early stages of development so caution- and consciousness are required when designing and reviewing processes (DRPs) are performed, since technological gaps represent a high risk for equipment structural resistance and life. Presented work researched some of most important technological gaps and failures within metals AM, lessons learned from past novel technologies, the environment in which the maritime industry is enclosed and respective common practices, concluding that dichotomy − decisions framed as binary choices of approval or rejection −, fixed mindsets − a belief that abilities and characteristics are static and unchangeable − and dependence of immature standards, guidelines and regulations represents a risk in terms of high potential of omissions. One of the challenges within mentioned ecosystem consists in improving internal processes and mindsets, both presenting necessary requirements to ensure safety of well-established technologies but also headlining gaps when under development ones are assessed. This publication suggests that the use of the new herein developed Cross-Hybrid Evaluations (CHP) in DRPs represents a significant leap towards safety insurance, increasing of reliability and reduction of barriers that hinders the plenty expansion of metal AM within maritime industry.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies.
Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials.
Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged.
Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.