Addressing and mitigating risks of failures in metals additive manufacturing concerning the maritime industry

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Engineering Failure Analysis Pub Date : 2025-05-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109398
Mario Augusto Lopes de Castro , Adam Saxty , Martyn Wright , Sean Murray
{"title":"Addressing and mitigating risks of failures in metals additive manufacturing concerning the maritime industry","authors":"Mario Augusto Lopes de Castro ,&nbsp;Adam Saxty ,&nbsp;Martyn Wright ,&nbsp;Sean Murray","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Additive manufacturing (AM) arises as a promise to increase design freedom and hence to optimize equipment, as this uncages the manufacturing of more complex geometric shapes. Metal AM in the maritime industry is a process in early stages of development so caution- and consciousness are required when designing and reviewing processes (DRPs) are performed, since technological gaps represent a high risk for equipment structural resistance and life. Presented work researched some of most important technological gaps and failures within metals AM, lessons learned from past novel technologies, the environment in which the maritime industry is enclosed and respective common practices, concluding that <em>dichotomy</em> − decisions framed as binary choices of approval or rejection −, <em>fixed mindsets</em> − a belief that abilities and characteristics are static and unchangeable − and dependence of immature standards, guidelines and regulations represents a risk in terms of high potential of omissions. One of the challenges within mentioned ecosystem consists in improving internal processes and mindsets, both presenting necessary requirements to ensure safety of well-established technologies but also headlining gaps when under development ones are assessed. This publication suggests that the use of the new herein developed Cross-Hybrid Evaluations (CHP) in DRPs represents a significant leap towards safety insurance, increasing of reliability and reduction of barriers that hinders the plenty expansion of metal AM within maritime industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 109398"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630725001396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) arises as a promise to increase design freedom and hence to optimize equipment, as this uncages the manufacturing of more complex geometric shapes. Metal AM in the maritime industry is a process in early stages of development so caution- and consciousness are required when designing and reviewing processes (DRPs) are performed, since technological gaps represent a high risk for equipment structural resistance and life. Presented work researched some of most important technological gaps and failures within metals AM, lessons learned from past novel technologies, the environment in which the maritime industry is enclosed and respective common practices, concluding that dichotomy − decisions framed as binary choices of approval or rejection −, fixed mindsets − a belief that abilities and characteristics are static and unchangeable − and dependence of immature standards, guidelines and regulations represents a risk in terms of high potential of omissions. One of the challenges within mentioned ecosystem consists in improving internal processes and mindsets, both presenting necessary requirements to ensure safety of well-established technologies but also headlining gaps when under development ones are assessed. This publication suggests that the use of the new herein developed Cross-Hybrid Evaluations (CHP) in DRPs represents a significant leap towards safety insurance, increasing of reliability and reduction of barriers that hinders the plenty expansion of metal AM within maritime industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决和减轻与海事行业有关的金属增材制造故障风险
增材制造(AM)有望增加设计自由度,从而优化设备,因为它限制了更复杂几何形状的制造。海运业中的金属增材制造是一个处于早期发展阶段的过程,因此在设计和审查过程(drp)时需要谨慎和意识,因为技术差距代表了设备结构阻力和寿命的高风险。所提交的工作研究了金属AM中一些最重要的技术差距和失败,从过去的新技术中吸取的教训,海事行业所处的封闭环境和各自的常见做法,得出的结论是二分法-决定框架为赞成或拒绝的二元选择-固定心态-相信能力和特征是静态的和不可改变的-以及对不成熟标准的依赖。准则和条例代表着一种风险,因为遗漏的可能性很大。上述生态系统面临的挑战之一是改进内部流程和思维方式,既提出了确保成熟技术安全的必要要求,又在评估开发中的技术时突出了差距。该出版物表明,在DRPs中使用本文开发的新交叉混合评估(CHP)代表了向安全保险、提高可靠性和减少阻碍金属AM在海事行业大量扩展的障碍的重大飞跃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Failure Analysis
Engineering Failure Analysis 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
956
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies. Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials. Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged. Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Failure analysis of the bolted connection in a shipboard crane tower: A case study of catastrophic bolt fracture Influence mechanism and optimizing threshold of contact strip profile on wear and dynamics of pantograph-catenary system Effect of tension-torsion coupling on the mechanical properties and damage characteristics of wire rope Damage-incorporated method for generating reinforcement material topological configurations in RC structures Dynamic modeling and analysis of the four-point contact ball bearing with inner rings flexible deformation and multi-point contact characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1