Biaxial flexural strength and surface characterization of multilayer zirconium dioxide after polishing, glazing and clinical adjustments

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106930
Camilla Johansson , Christel Larsson , Evaggelia Papia
{"title":"Biaxial flexural strength and surface characterization of multilayer zirconium dioxide after polishing, glazing and clinical adjustments","authors":"Camilla Johansson ,&nbsp;Christel Larsson ,&nbsp;Evaggelia Papia","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate how laboratory polishing and glazing and clinical adjustments, i.e., by grinding and polishing affect the biaxial flexural strength and surface characterization of multilayer zirconia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Specimens of KATANA™ Zirconia YML, containing Enamel–Body 1 or Body 2–3 layers, and UTML were divided into 18 groups (<em>n</em> = 11) according to material/layer and finish treatment: laboratory polishing, glazing, or both, or followed by clinical adjustments. The surface roughness, surface structure and elemental composition were evaluated<em>.</em> Thermocyclic-mechanical cyclic loading and biaxial flexural strength test were performed. Three- and two-way ANOVA were used (<em>α</em> = 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The yttrium amount decreased in the order UTML, YML Enamel–Body 1, and YML Body 2–3. Body 2–3 showed higher flexural strength than Enamel–Body 1 and UTML, in that order. Flexural strength after clinical adjustments was higher in Body 2–3 but lower in Enamel–Body 1 and UTML. Finish treatments had indistinguishable impact on Enamel–Body 1. Body 2–3 had higher strength after polishing, polishing and glazing, and glazing, in that order. UTML displayed the highest strength after polishing and glazing or glazing. The surface roughness was lowest after polishing regardless of material/layer.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Laboratory treatments and clinical adjustments of multilayer zirconia affect the flexural strength and surface roughness differently depending on the zirconia type. Composition-gradient zirconia should be polished, and shade-gradient zirconia (≥ 5 mol% yttria) should be polished and glazed. Clinical adjustments of zirconia with higher yttria content are detrimental for the flexural strength and should be performed with caution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 106930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616125000463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate how laboratory polishing and glazing and clinical adjustments, i.e., by grinding and polishing affect the biaxial flexural strength and surface characterization of multilayer zirconia.

Methods

Specimens of KATANA™ Zirconia YML, containing Enamel–Body 1 or Body 2–3 layers, and UTML were divided into 18 groups (n = 11) according to material/layer and finish treatment: laboratory polishing, glazing, or both, or followed by clinical adjustments. The surface roughness, surface structure and elemental composition were evaluated. Thermocyclic-mechanical cyclic loading and biaxial flexural strength test were performed. Three- and two-way ANOVA were used (α = 0.05).

Results

The yttrium amount decreased in the order UTML, YML Enamel–Body 1, and YML Body 2–3. Body 2–3 showed higher flexural strength than Enamel–Body 1 and UTML, in that order. Flexural strength after clinical adjustments was higher in Body 2–3 but lower in Enamel–Body 1 and UTML. Finish treatments had indistinguishable impact on Enamel–Body 1. Body 2–3 had higher strength after polishing, polishing and glazing, and glazing, in that order. UTML displayed the highest strength after polishing and glazing or glazing. The surface roughness was lowest after polishing regardless of material/layer.

Conclusions

Laboratory treatments and clinical adjustments of multilayer zirconia affect the flexural strength and surface roughness differently depending on the zirconia type. Composition-gradient zirconia should be polished, and shade-gradient zirconia (≥ 5 mol% yttria) should be polished and glazed. Clinical adjustments of zirconia with higher yttria content are detrimental for the flexural strength and should be performed with caution.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抛光、上光及临床调整后多层二氧化锆的双轴抗折强度及表面表征
目的评价实验室抛光抛光和临床调整(即研磨抛光)对多层氧化锆双轴抗折强度和表面表征的影响。方法将含有搪瓷-体1层或体2-3层的KATANA™氧化锆YML和UTML样品根据材料/层数和表面处理分为18组(n = 11):实验室抛光、上釉或两者兼做,或随后进行临床调整。对表面粗糙度、表面结构和元素组成进行了评价。进行了热循环-机械循环加载和双轴抗弯强度试验。采用三、双因素方差分析(α = 0.05)。结果YML -珐琅体1、YML -珐琅体2-3的钇含量依次递减。体2-3的抗折强度依次高于搪瓷体1和html。临床调整后,体2-3的抗弯强度较高,而搪瓷体1和UTML的抗弯强度较低。饰面处理对搪瓷体1的影响不明显。体2-3经抛光、抛光后上光、上光后强度较高。html在抛光和上光或上光后显示出最高的强度。无论何种材料/层,抛光后的表面粗糙度最低。结论实验室处理和临床调整对多层氧化锆抗弯强度和表面粗糙度的影响随氧化锆类型的不同而不同。成分梯度氧化锆应抛光,阴影梯度氧化锆(氧化钇≥5 mol%)应抛光和上光。临床使用钇含量高的氧化锆调整对抗折强度不利,应谨慎操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
505
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials. The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.
期刊最新文献
Fatigue survival rate of different core and veneer designs for anterior all-ceramic crowns Optimization of 3D printing parameters for PLGA/HA scaffolds using the Taguchi method Unveiling the link between surface physicochemistry and nanomechanical behavior in bleached and UV-irradiated human hair fibers Additively manufactured radially graded stainless steel lattices for structural biomedical applications Assessment of nanoindentation protocols for murine skin matrix biomechanics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1