"I'm not alone": perinatal women's experiences in an online self-directed program for perinatal anxiety.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07270-3
Light Uchechukwu, Madison P Hardman, Isabelle Hadley, Megan E Gornik, Sarah K Petty, Teaghan A M Pryor, Gillian M Alcolado, Patricia Furer, Kristin A Reynolds
{"title":"\"I'm not alone\": perinatal women's experiences in an online self-directed program for perinatal anxiety.","authors":"Light Uchechukwu, Madison P Hardman, Isabelle Hadley, Megan E Gornik, Sarah K Petty, Teaghan A M Pryor, Gillian M Alcolado, Patricia Furer, Kristin A Reynolds","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07270-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety is highly prevalent during pregnancy and postpartum, and access to treatment can be difficult due to a range of barriers (e.g., time, distance, and service availability). Online treatments have the potential to circumvent these barriers and may, therefore, be beneficial for the perinatal population. The present study leveraged qualitative methods to understand participants' perspectives on their use of a six-module online self-directed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program for perinatal anxiety as part of a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed qualitative method design was used for this study. A total of 95 perinatal women were randomized to an intervention or waitlist control condition for an online self-directed program (Overcoming Perinatal Anxiety; OPA). Both waitlist and intervention participants provided open-ended feedback on each module via online surveys. A subset of individuals (n = 20) assigned to the intervention condition completed a virtual qualitative interview about their experiences using the program. Data obtained from open-ended survey questions and qualitative interviews were analyzed using Conventional Content Analysis (open-ended survey) and Reflexive Thematic Analysis (interviews).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Open-ended survey data were categorized into three themes, with associated sub-themes: User experience (subthemes: accessibility and modality), Perceptions of content (sub-themes: validating, informative, hopeful, anxiety-inducing, emotionally \"heavy\", and helpful), and Barriers to program engagement (subthemes: lack of time and energy, technical difficulties, challenging and external factors). Qualitative interview data were categorized into the following main themes, with associated subthemes: Tensions in engaging with the self-directed program (subthemes: connecting and multi-tasking, \"finding the time,\" module length and pacing, pen to paper, and \"thanks for the reminder but don't rush me\"), \"I'm not alone,\" (subthemes: relating to the content, sharing anxiety with \"inner circle,\" and voicing a desire to connect with other \"moms feeling the same way\"), and \"I'm managing my anxiety\" (subthemes: \"understanding my anxiety,\" using \"strategies to help with my anxiety,\" \"taking time for myself,\" and moving forward).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight that online self-directed treatment can be an acceptable and feasible option for perinatal anxiety. Findings show promise for the scalability of OPA to improve access to psychological treatment for perinatal people experiencing anxiety.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT04844138 (clinicaltrials.gov). Trial registration submitted: [April 5, 2021] accepted: [April 14, 2021].</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07270-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anxiety is highly prevalent during pregnancy and postpartum, and access to treatment can be difficult due to a range of barriers (e.g., time, distance, and service availability). Online treatments have the potential to circumvent these barriers and may, therefore, be beneficial for the perinatal population. The present study leveraged qualitative methods to understand participants' perspectives on their use of a six-module online self-directed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program for perinatal anxiety as part of a randomized controlled trial.

Methods: A mixed qualitative method design was used for this study. A total of 95 perinatal women were randomized to an intervention or waitlist control condition for an online self-directed program (Overcoming Perinatal Anxiety; OPA). Both waitlist and intervention participants provided open-ended feedback on each module via online surveys. A subset of individuals (n = 20) assigned to the intervention condition completed a virtual qualitative interview about their experiences using the program. Data obtained from open-ended survey questions and qualitative interviews were analyzed using Conventional Content Analysis (open-ended survey) and Reflexive Thematic Analysis (interviews).

Results: Open-ended survey data were categorized into three themes, with associated sub-themes: User experience (subthemes: accessibility and modality), Perceptions of content (sub-themes: validating, informative, hopeful, anxiety-inducing, emotionally "heavy", and helpful), and Barriers to program engagement (subthemes: lack of time and energy, technical difficulties, challenging and external factors). Qualitative interview data were categorized into the following main themes, with associated subthemes: Tensions in engaging with the self-directed program (subthemes: connecting and multi-tasking, "finding the time," module length and pacing, pen to paper, and "thanks for the reminder but don't rush me"), "I'm not alone," (subthemes: relating to the content, sharing anxiety with "inner circle," and voicing a desire to connect with other "moms feeling the same way"), and "I'm managing my anxiety" (subthemes: "understanding my anxiety," using "strategies to help with my anxiety," "taking time for myself," and moving forward).

Conclusion: Findings highlight that online self-directed treatment can be an acceptable and feasible option for perinatal anxiety. Findings show promise for the scalability of OPA to improve access to psychological treatment for perinatal people experiencing anxiety.

Trial registration: Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT04844138 (clinicaltrials.gov). Trial registration submitted: [April 5, 2021] accepted: [April 14, 2021].

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我并不孤单”:围产期妇女在一个在线自我指导的围产期焦虑项目中的经历。
背景:焦虑在怀孕和产后非常普遍,由于一系列障碍(如时间、距离和服务可得性),获得治疗可能很困难。在线治疗有可能绕过这些障碍,因此可能对围产期人群有益。作为随机对照试验的一部分,本研究利用定性方法来了解参与者使用六模块在线自我导向认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗围产期焦虑的观点。方法:采用混合定性方法设计。共有95名围产期妇女被随机分为干预组或候补组,参加在线自我指导项目(克服围产期焦虑;OPA)。候补名单和干预参与者都通过在线调查对每个模块提供了开放式反馈。分配到干预条件的个体子集(n = 20)完成了关于他们使用该程序的经验的虚拟定性访谈。从开放式调查问题和定性访谈中获得的数据使用传统内容分析(开放式调查)和反身性主题分析(访谈)进行分析。结果:开放式调查数据分为三个主题,以及相关的子主题:用户体验(子主题:可访问性和形态),对内容的感知(子主题:验证,信息,希望,焦虑诱导,情感“沉重”和有用),以及项目参与的障碍(子主题:缺乏时间和精力,技术困难,挑战和外部因素)。定性访谈数据被分为以下几个主题,以及相关的次主题:参与自主项目时的紧张感(次主题:联系和多任务处理,“找到时间”,模块长度和节奏,动笔,“谢谢你的提醒,但不要催我”),“我并不孤单”(次主题:与内容相关,与“核心圈子”分享焦虑,并表达与其他“有同样感受的妈妈”联系的愿望),以及“我正在管理我的焦虑”(副主题:“理解我的焦虑”,使用“帮助我缓解焦虑的策略”,“为自己腾出时间”,以及继续前进)。结论:研究结果强调在线自我指导治疗是围产期焦虑的一种可接受和可行的选择。研究结果显示,OPA的可扩展性有望改善围产期焦虑患者获得心理治疗的机会。试验注册:临床试验标识符:NCT04844138 (clinicaltrials.gov)。试验注册提交:【2021年4月5日】接受:【2021年4月14日】。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Improving maternity and neonatal care in England: protocol for a formative evaluation of the implementation of the core competency framework to enhance multi-professional practice. -Impact of first-trimester preeclampsia screening on perinatal and maternal morbidity: the RANSPRE open multicenter randomized trial. Prediction of preterm and low birth weight risk using a physiology based artificial neural network integrating hematological, dental, and periodontal index markers: a cross sectional study based on machine learning. Visual Biofeedback (VB) through Trans-Perineal Ultrasound (TPU) during the active second stage of labor to improve maternal childbirth satisfaction: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Live births after low initial β-hCG in IVF cycles: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1