The effects of vestibular vertical incisions on the tunnel technique: a randomized clinical trial for the treatment of Recession Type 1 single gingival recessions.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05611-4
Ziyuan Chen, Keang Fan, Ying Xie, Shuangying Zhou, Jinsheng Zhong, Xiangying Ouyang
{"title":"The effects of vestibular vertical incisions on the tunnel technique: a randomized clinical trial for the treatment of Recession Type 1 single gingival recessions.","authors":"Ziyuan Chen, Keang Fan, Ying Xie, Shuangying Zhou, Jinsheng Zhong, Xiangying Ouyang","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05611-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the clinical, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of the vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) technique and the modified tunnel (mTunnel) technique, both combined with connective tissue grafts (CTGs), for treating recession type 1 (RT1) single gingival recessions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 24 patients with single non-molar RT1 recessions were randomly assigned to the VISTA + CTG or the mTunnel + CTG group. A blinded examiner assessed the recession reduction (RecRed), mean root coverage (MRC), complete root coverage (CRC), keratinized tissue width, patient-reported outcomes, and root coverage esthetic score (RES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months, both groups achieved significant recession reduction. However, there were no significant differences in RecRed and MRC between the groups (VISTA: 2.38 ± 0.96 mm and 90.28 ± 18.06%, mTunnel: 2.08 ± 1.10 mm and 81.25 ± 29.16%; P = 1 and P = 0.834, respectively). The CRC was significantly higher in the VISTA group (VISTA: 75%, mTunnel: 50%; P < 0.001). Both groups obtained high RES scores (VISTA: 8.75 ± 1.14, mTunnel: 7.75 ± 2.99, P = 0.786), but the mTunnel group demonstrated significantly less scar formation (P = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both procedures effectively treated single RT1 recessions at 12-months follow-up. However, the VISTA technique demonstrated superior CRC results compared to the modified tunnel technique.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial had been registered prospectively at http://www.chictr.org.cn on 19/12/2015 (Registration number: ChiCTR-INR-16007845), and structured according to the CONSORT statement.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"278"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05611-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To compare the clinical, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of the vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) technique and the modified tunnel (mTunnel) technique, both combined with connective tissue grafts (CTGs), for treating recession type 1 (RT1) single gingival recessions.

Methods: A total of 24 patients with single non-molar RT1 recessions were randomly assigned to the VISTA + CTG or the mTunnel + CTG group. A blinded examiner assessed the recession reduction (RecRed), mean root coverage (MRC), complete root coverage (CRC), keratinized tissue width, patient-reported outcomes, and root coverage esthetic score (RES).

Results: At 12 months, both groups achieved significant recession reduction. However, there were no significant differences in RecRed and MRC between the groups (VISTA: 2.38 ± 0.96 mm and 90.28 ± 18.06%, mTunnel: 2.08 ± 1.10 mm and 81.25 ± 29.16%; P = 1 and P = 0.834, respectively). The CRC was significantly higher in the VISTA group (VISTA: 75%, mTunnel: 50%; P < 0.001). Both groups obtained high RES scores (VISTA: 8.75 ± 1.14, mTunnel: 7.75 ± 2.99, P = 0.786), but the mTunnel group demonstrated significantly less scar formation (P = 0.014).

Conclusions: Both procedures effectively treated single RT1 recessions at 12-months follow-up. However, the VISTA technique demonstrated superior CRC results compared to the modified tunnel technique.

Trial registration: The trial had been registered prospectively at http://www.chictr.org.cn on 19/12/2015 (Registration number: ChiCTR-INR-16007845), and structured according to the CONSORT statement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前庭垂直切口对隧道技术的影响:一项治疗1型单牙龈衰退的随机临床试验。
背景:比较前庭切口骨膜下隧道通道(VISTA)技术和改良隧道(mTunnel)技术联合结缔组织移植物(CTGs)治疗1型退缩(RT1)单牙龈退缩的临床、美学和患者报告的结果。方法:将24例单一非磨牙RT1衰退患者随机分为VISTA + CTG组或mTunnel + CTG组。盲法检查者评估退行性减少(RecRed)、平均根覆盖(MRC)、完全根覆盖(CRC)、角质化组织宽度、患者报告的结果和根覆盖美学评分(RES)。结果:12个月后,两组患者的衰退程度均显著降低。然而,两组间的RecRed和MRC差异无统计学意义(VISTA: 2.38±0.96 mm和90.28±18.06%,mTunnel: 2.08±1.10 mm和81.25±29.16%;P = 1, P = 0.834)。VISTA组CRC显著高于VISTA组(VISTA: 75%, mTunnel: 50%;结论:在12个月的随访中,这两种方法都有效地治疗了单次RT1衰退。然而,与改进的隧道技术相比,VISTA技术显示出更好的CRC结果。试验注册:该试验已于2015年12月19日在http://www.chictr.org.cn上进行前瞻性注册(注册号:ChiCTR-INR-16007845),并根据CONSORT声明进行组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Salivary periodontal pathogens in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis: correlations with disease activity. Development and validation of a comprehensive clinical-radiographic difficulty scale for impacted mandibular third molar extractions: a prospective study. Association of sleep bruxism with obstructive sleep apnea and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cross-sectional study in Egyptian governmental dental clinics. Clinically interpretable deep learning for pediatric dental age estimation with explainable AI. Ageing, multimorbidity and polypharmacy shape prosthodontic case-mix in undergraduate clinics: a 9-year retrospective cohort study of 1,205 patients in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1