Causality Assessment of Adverse Events by Healthcare Professionals in an Academic Hospital Setting: A Descriptive Retrospective Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1139/cjpp-2024-0268
Sonia Corbin, Maude Lavallée, Pallavi Pradhan, Magalie Thibault, Julie Méthot, Laura Blonde Guefack Djiokeng, Anick Berard, Marie-Eve Piché, Fernanda Raphael Escobar Gimenes, Rosalie Darveau, Isabelle Cloutier, Jacinthe Leclerc
{"title":"Causality Assessment of Adverse Events by Healthcare Professionals in an Academic Hospital Setting: A Descriptive Retrospective Study.","authors":"Sonia Corbin, Maude Lavallée, Pallavi Pradhan, Magalie Thibault, Julie Méthot, Laura Blonde Guefack Djiokeng, Anick Berard, Marie-Eve Piché, Fernanda Raphael Escobar Gimenes, Rosalie Darveau, Isabelle Cloutier, Jacinthe Leclerc","doi":"10.1139/cjpp-2024-0268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing the causality of a drug product-related adverse event (AE) is a very important aspect of pharmacovigilance. However, it is unclear whether AEs are investigated for causality in a hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims of this study were to: 1) evaluate the proportion of AEs for which causality is sought and, 2) list the causality assessment (CA) tools used by healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study includes 500 randomized patients (125 patients/year) admitted to a tertiary care academic hospital between 2018-2021. Electronic medical records were reviewed and relevant variables were extracted: 1) demographic, 2) hospitalization, 3) drug product, 4) AE and, 5) CA. A descriptive analysis was carried out (median, minimum-maximum, proportion) to characterize our sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The characteristic of our sample was as follows: median age 69 years old (range: 21-96 yrs), 43.6% female, median comorbidities/patient 4 (0-12), and median hospital stay of 3 days (1-19). We identified a total of 9,568 drug products and 2,541 AEs, among these, 302 (8.4%) were SAEs. No CA (n=0) or CA tools (n=0) were found in our sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, we report that no AEs, whether serious or non-serious, were subject to documented CA.</p>","PeriodicalId":9520,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjpp-2024-0268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessing the causality of a drug product-related adverse event (AE) is a very important aspect of pharmacovigilance. However, it is unclear whether AEs are investigated for causality in a hospital setting.

Objectives: The aims of this study were to: 1) evaluate the proportion of AEs for which causality is sought and, 2) list the causality assessment (CA) tools used by healthcare professionals.

Methods: This retrospective study includes 500 randomized patients (125 patients/year) admitted to a tertiary care academic hospital between 2018-2021. Electronic medical records were reviewed and relevant variables were extracted: 1) demographic, 2) hospitalization, 3) drug product, 4) AE and, 5) CA. A descriptive analysis was carried out (median, minimum-maximum, proportion) to characterize our sample.

Results: The characteristic of our sample was as follows: median age 69 years old (range: 21-96 yrs), 43.6% female, median comorbidities/patient 4 (0-12), and median hospital stay of 3 days (1-19). We identified a total of 9,568 drug products and 2,541 AEs, among these, 302 (8.4%) were SAEs. No CA (n=0) or CA tools (n=0) were found in our sample.

Conclusion: In this study, we report that no AEs, whether serious or non-serious, were subject to documented CA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1929, the Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology is a monthly journal that reports current research in all aspects of physiology, nutrition, pharmacology, and toxicology, contributed by recognized experts and scientists. It publishes symposium reviews and award lectures and occasionally dedicates entire issues or portions of issues to subjects of special interest to its international readership. The journal periodically publishes a “Made In Canada” special section that features invited review articles from internationally recognized scientists who have received some of their training in Canada.
期刊最新文献
Chemical synthesis, in vitro testing, and in silico Nampt-based molecular docking of novel aniline aromatic ring-substituted 2-aminothiazole analogs. Right ventricular dysfunction in preclinical models of type I and type II diabetes. Endothelial characteristics of cardiac stem cell antigen-1 expressing cells and their relevance to right ventricular adaptation. Examining tissue-level changes in Doxorubicin accumulation and Nitric Oxide formation in skeletal muscle and tumours in a mouse model of breast cancer. Causality Assessment of Adverse Events by Healthcare Professionals in an Academic Hospital Setting: A Descriptive Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1