Prospective associations between muscle strength and genetic susceptibility to type 2 diabetes with incident type 2 diabetes: a UK Biobank study.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03819-9
Mengyao Wang, Paul James Collings, Haeyoon Jang, Ziyuan Chen, Qiaoxin Shi, Hin Sheung Ho, Shan Luo, Shiu Lun Au Yeung, Youngwon Kim
{"title":"Prospective associations between muscle strength and genetic susceptibility to type 2 diabetes with incident type 2 diabetes: a UK Biobank study.","authors":"Mengyao Wang, Paul James Collings, Haeyoon Jang, Ziyuan Chen, Qiaoxin Shi, Hin Sheung Ho, Shan Luo, Shiu Lun Au Yeung, Youngwon Kim","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03819-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study explored whether the prospective associations between muscle strength and incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) differ by varying levels of genetic susceptibility to T2D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 141,848 white British individuals from the UK Biobank. Muscle strength was expressed as the relative value of grip strength (measured by a hand dynamometer) divided by fat-free mass (measured via bioelectrical impedance analysis). Three categories of muscle strength (low, medium and high) were generated based on the sex- and age-specific tertiles. Genetic risk of T2D was estimated using a weighted polygenic risk score based on 138 independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms for T2D. During a median 7.4-year follow-up, 4,743 incident T2D cases were accrued. Cox regression with age as the underlying timescale was fit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High muscle strength was associated with a 44% lower hazard of T2D (HR:0.56, 95%CI:0.52-0.60), compared with low muscle strength, after adjustment for genetic risk of T2D. The inverse association between muscle strength and incident T2D was weaker in individuals with high genetic susceptibility. There was evidence of interaction between muscle strength and genetic susceptibility to T2D (p-additive = 0.010, p-multiplicative = 0.046). The estimated 8-year absolute risk of T2D was lower for high genetic risk-high muscle strength (2.47%), compared with low (2.89%) or medium (4.00%) genetic risk combined with low muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher muscle strength was associated with lower relative risk of developing T2D, irrespective of genetic susceptibility to T2D, while such association was weaker in the high genetic risk group. Individuals at high genetic risk of T2D but with high muscle strength may have a lower 8-year absolute risk of developing T2D, compared with those at low or medium genetic risk but with low muscle strength. Our findings inform future clinical trials to prevent or delay the onset of T2D by implementing muscle-strengthening interventions among individuals of varying levels of genetic susceptibility to T2D, including those with high genetic risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03819-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study explored whether the prospective associations between muscle strength and incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) differ by varying levels of genetic susceptibility to T2D.

Methods: This study included 141,848 white British individuals from the UK Biobank. Muscle strength was expressed as the relative value of grip strength (measured by a hand dynamometer) divided by fat-free mass (measured via bioelectrical impedance analysis). Three categories of muscle strength (low, medium and high) were generated based on the sex- and age-specific tertiles. Genetic risk of T2D was estimated using a weighted polygenic risk score based on 138 independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms for T2D. During a median 7.4-year follow-up, 4,743 incident T2D cases were accrued. Cox regression with age as the underlying timescale was fit.

Results: High muscle strength was associated with a 44% lower hazard of T2D (HR:0.56, 95%CI:0.52-0.60), compared with low muscle strength, after adjustment for genetic risk of T2D. The inverse association between muscle strength and incident T2D was weaker in individuals with high genetic susceptibility. There was evidence of interaction between muscle strength and genetic susceptibility to T2D (p-additive = 0.010, p-multiplicative = 0.046). The estimated 8-year absolute risk of T2D was lower for high genetic risk-high muscle strength (2.47%), compared with low (2.89%) or medium (4.00%) genetic risk combined with low muscle strength.

Conclusions: Higher muscle strength was associated with lower relative risk of developing T2D, irrespective of genetic susceptibility to T2D, while such association was weaker in the high genetic risk group. Individuals at high genetic risk of T2D but with high muscle strength may have a lower 8-year absolute risk of developing T2D, compared with those at low or medium genetic risk but with low muscle strength. Our findings inform future clinical trials to prevent or delay the onset of T2D by implementing muscle-strengthening interventions among individuals of varying levels of genetic susceptibility to T2D, including those with high genetic risk.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌肉力量和2型糖尿病遗传易感性与2型糖尿病事件之间的前瞻性关联:英国生物银行研究
背景:本研究探讨肌肉力量与2型糖尿病(T2D)发病率之间的前瞻性关联是否因T2D遗传易感性水平的不同而不同。方法:本研究包括来自英国生物银行的141,848名英国白人个体。肌肉力量表示为握力(通过手部测力仪测量)除以无脂质量(通过生物电阻抗分析测量)的相对值。根据性别和年龄,肌肉力量分为三类(低、中、高)。采用基于138个独立的T2D单核苷酸多态性的加权多基因风险评分来估计T2D的遗传风险。在中位7.4年的随访期间,累计发生了4743例T2D病例。以年龄为基础时间尺度的Cox回归拟合。结果:在调整T2D遗传风险后,与低肌肉力量相比,高肌肉力量与T2D风险降低44%相关(HR:0.56, 95%CI:0.52-0.60)。在高遗传易感性的个体中,肌肉力量与T2D的负相关关系较弱。肌肉力量与T2D遗传易感性之间存在交互作用(p-加性= 0.010,p-乘性= 0.046)。与低肌肉力量的低(2.89%)或中等(4.00%)遗传风险相比,高遗传风险-高肌肉力量的患者8年T2D绝对风险较低(2.47%)。结论:与T2D的遗传易感性无关,较高的肌肉力量与较低的T2D相对风险相关,而在高遗传风险组中,这种相关性较弱。与具有低或中等遗传风险但肌肉强度低的个体相比,具有高T2D遗传风险但肌肉强度高的个体在8年内发生T2D的绝对风险可能更低。我们的研究结果为未来的临床试验提供了信息,可以通过对不同程度的T2D遗传易感性个体(包括那些具有高遗传风险的个体)实施肌肉强化干预来预防或延迟T2D的发病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Placental insulin-mTOR and stress-inflammatory signaling patterns are associated with childhood adiposity. Genetic predisposition for depression, psychosocial and behavioural factors and premenstrual symptoms: a cross-sectional study among young women in China. Waist circumference and grip strength and their joint relations to type 2 diabetes incidence in UK Biobank. Smartphone-based lightweight AI system for real-time multiple anterior segment disease screening: development and real-world validation. Obesity-derived metabolites modulate anti-tumor immunity in the tumor microenvironment: from mechanisms to clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1