Ultra-processed food consumption in the central division of Fiji.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1186/s12916-025-03947-w
Aliyah Palu, Joseph Alvin Santos, Daisy Coyle, Maria Shahid, Juliette Crowther, Gade Waqa, Colin Bell, Jacqui Webster, Briar McKenzie
{"title":"Ultra-processed food consumption in the central division of Fiji.","authors":"Aliyah Palu, Joseph Alvin Santos, Daisy Coyle, Maria Shahid, Juliette Crowther, Gade Waqa, Colin Bell, Jacqui Webster, Briar McKenzie","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-03947-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Processed packaged foods are readily available in Fiji; however, the extent to which ultra-processed foods (UPFs) currently contribute to energy and nutrient intake is unknown. This study aimed to assess the contribution of UPFs to total energy intake and nutrients of concern (sodium, sugar, fat) in a representative sample of adults in the central division of Fiji, identify the main food category sources of UPFs and assess variation by sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random sample of 700 adults was selected from two statistical enumeration areas (one semi-urban, one rural). Participant characteristics were collected, and a three-pass 24-h diet recall was undertaken. Foods consumed were coded based on the level of processing, in alignment with the NOVA categorisation system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The contribution of UPFs to total energy, fat, sugar, and sodium intake and dietary sources of UPFs (based on the per cent daily energy contribution of UPFs from food groups) were estimated and assessed by sex, age group, ethnicity and location. A total of 534 adults participated (76% response rate, 50% female). UPFs contributed 21.5% (95% CI, 21.4% to 26.6%) of total energy intake, 22.8% (95% CI 20.5% to 25.1%) of total sodium intake, 24.0% (95% CI, 21.4% to 26.6%) of sugar intake and 18.6% (95% CI 16.5% to 20.7%) of total fat intake. Key food group contributors to UPF intake were bread and bakery products 42.9% (38.3% to 47.6%), non-alcoholic beverages 26.8% (22.4% to 31.1%), convenience foods 8.6% (6.3% to 10.8%), and meat, poultry, and meat alternatives 6.9% (4.8% to 8.9%). The contribution of UPFs to sodium, sugar and fat intake was similar for men and women; however, differences were observed by age group, ethnicity and region (semi-urban compared to rural).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified that UPFs appear to be a large contributor to energy, sodium, fat and sugar intake in adults in the Central division of Fiji. A reduction of UPF consumption in Fiji may lead to a reduction of harmful nutrients such as sodium, fat, and sugar, crucial to reducing the diet-related burden of disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"109"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03947-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Processed packaged foods are readily available in Fiji; however, the extent to which ultra-processed foods (UPFs) currently contribute to energy and nutrient intake is unknown. This study aimed to assess the contribution of UPFs to total energy intake and nutrients of concern (sodium, sugar, fat) in a representative sample of adults in the central division of Fiji, identify the main food category sources of UPFs and assess variation by sociodemographic characteristics.

Methods: A random sample of 700 adults was selected from two statistical enumeration areas (one semi-urban, one rural). Participant characteristics were collected, and a three-pass 24-h diet recall was undertaken. Foods consumed were coded based on the level of processing, in alignment with the NOVA categorisation system.

Results: The contribution of UPFs to total energy, fat, sugar, and sodium intake and dietary sources of UPFs (based on the per cent daily energy contribution of UPFs from food groups) were estimated and assessed by sex, age group, ethnicity and location. A total of 534 adults participated (76% response rate, 50% female). UPFs contributed 21.5% (95% CI, 21.4% to 26.6%) of total energy intake, 22.8% (95% CI 20.5% to 25.1%) of total sodium intake, 24.0% (95% CI, 21.4% to 26.6%) of sugar intake and 18.6% (95% CI 16.5% to 20.7%) of total fat intake. Key food group contributors to UPF intake were bread and bakery products 42.9% (38.3% to 47.6%), non-alcoholic beverages 26.8% (22.4% to 31.1%), convenience foods 8.6% (6.3% to 10.8%), and meat, poultry, and meat alternatives 6.9% (4.8% to 8.9%). The contribution of UPFs to sodium, sugar and fat intake was similar for men and women; however, differences were observed by age group, ethnicity and region (semi-urban compared to rural).

Conclusions: This study identified that UPFs appear to be a large contributor to energy, sodium, fat and sugar intake in adults in the Central division of Fiji. A reduction of UPF consumption in Fiji may lead to a reduction of harmful nutrients such as sodium, fat, and sugar, crucial to reducing the diet-related burden of disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斐济中部地区的超加工食品消费。
背景:加工包装食品在斐济很容易买到;然而,目前超加工食品(upf)对能量和营养摄入的贡献程度尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估斐济中部地区成人代表性样本中upf对总能量摄入和关注营养素(钠、糖、脂肪)的贡献,确定upf的主要食物类别来源,并根据社会人口特征评估差异。方法:随机抽取2个统计点选区(1个半城市,1个农村)700名成人。收集参与者特征,并进行三次24小时饮食回忆。消费的食物根据加工水平进行编码,与NOVA分类系统保持一致。结果:UPFs对总能量、脂肪、糖和钠摄入量的贡献以及UPFs的膳食来源(基于UPFs来自食物组的每日能量贡献的百分比)按性别、年龄组、种族和地点进行了估计和评估。共有534名成年人参与调查(76%的回复率,50%为女性)。upf贡献了总能量摄入的21.5% (95% CI, 21.4%至26.6%),总钠摄入量的22.8% (95% CI, 20.5%至25.1%),糖摄入量的24.0% (95% CI, 21.4%至26.6%)和总脂肪摄入量的18.6% (95% CI, 16.5%至20.7%)。对UPF摄入量有贡献的主要食物组是面包和烘焙产品42.9%(38.3%至47.6%),非酒精饮料26.8%(22.4%至31.1%),方便食品8.6%(6.3%至10.8%),肉类、家禽和肉类替代品6.9%(4.8%至8.9%)。upf对钠、糖和脂肪摄入的贡献在男性和女性中是相似的;然而,不同年龄组、种族和地区(半城市与农村相比)存在差异。结论:本研究确定,upf似乎是斐济中部地区成年人摄入能量、钠、脂肪和糖的一个重要因素。在斐济,减少普遍健康食品的消费可能导致钠、脂肪和糖等有害营养素的减少,这对减少与饮食有关的疾病负担至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Cause-specific years of life lost attributable to non-optimal body mass index by county, sex, race, and ethnicity in the USA, 2000-2019: a systematic analysis of health disparities. Aperiodic and periodic neural activity during sleep in autism spectrum disorders. Relative leukocyte telomere length and the risk of lung cancer progression in individuals with pulmonary nodules. Global and regional prevalence, burden, and risk factors for MASLD in children and adolescents aged 5 to 24 years: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and modeling study. Oncostatin-M ligand-based CAR-T therapy displays robust anti-tumor activity against osteosarcoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1