Reliability assessment of CT enhancement rate and extracellular volume in liver fibrosis prediction.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY BMC Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1186/s12876-025-03678-5
Faeze Salahshour, Aminreza Abkhoo, Sina Sadeghian, Masoomeh Safaei
{"title":"Reliability assessment of CT enhancement rate and extracellular volume in liver fibrosis prediction.","authors":"Faeze Salahshour, Aminreza Abkhoo, Sina Sadeghian, Masoomeh Safaei","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03678-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reliable, non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis is essential for early disease management. Computed tomography (CT)-based extracellular volume (ECV) fraction and portal venous phase enhancement rate (VP-ER) have shown potential in quantifying mild-to-moderate fibrosis. This study investigates the diagnostic performance of ECV and VP-ER in differentiating non-significant (F0-F1) from significant (F2-F3) fibrosis in biopsy-confirmed patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-three patients (20-72 years, 56.9% male) undergoing liver biopsy and multiphasic CT scans were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with METAVIR F4 cirrhosis or incomplete imaging/pathological data were excluded. Hematocrit levels were obtained on the day of CT. ECV was calculated from differences in liver and aortic attenuation between delayed and enhanced phases, adjusted for hematocrit. VP-ER was derived as the ratio of liver attenuation in venous to portal venous phases multiplied by 100. Spearman's correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and DeLong tests evaluated their performance. Multiple logistic regression assessed independent contributions of ECV and VP-ER to fibrosis status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three patients had no significant fibrosis (F0-F1) and 40 had significant fibrosis (F2-F3). ECV demonstrated a moderate correlation with fibrosis grade (r = 0.531, p < 0.0001), while VP-ER showed a weaker yet statistically significant correlation (r = 0.363, p = 0.0003). ROC analyses yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.698 for ECV (cut-off = 38%) and 0.763 for VP-ER (cut-off = 71%), with no significant difference between AUCs (p = 0.358). VP-ER accurately classified 70 patients, while ECV correctly predicted 65. Logistic regression revealed significant associations for both VP-ER (OR = 1.08; p = 0.007) and ECV (OR = 1.025; p = 0.0132), achieving 72.04% classification accuracy and an overall AUC of 0.756 (95% CI: 0.688-0.863).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECV fraction and VP-ER demonstrated reliable, complementary capabilities for distinguishing non-significant fibrosis from significant fibrosis. Their combined use in routine multiphasic CT protocols may reduce dependence on invasive biopsy while offering robust sensitivity and specificity for early fibrosis assessment. Further studies including cirrhotic populations and larger cohorts are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03678-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reliable, non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis is essential for early disease management. Computed tomography (CT)-based extracellular volume (ECV) fraction and portal venous phase enhancement rate (VP-ER) have shown potential in quantifying mild-to-moderate fibrosis. This study investigates the diagnostic performance of ECV and VP-ER in differentiating non-significant (F0-F1) from significant (F2-F3) fibrosis in biopsy-confirmed patients.

Methods: Ninety-three patients (20-72 years, 56.9% male) undergoing liver biopsy and multiphasic CT scans were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with METAVIR F4 cirrhosis or incomplete imaging/pathological data were excluded. Hematocrit levels were obtained on the day of CT. ECV was calculated from differences in liver and aortic attenuation between delayed and enhanced phases, adjusted for hematocrit. VP-ER was derived as the ratio of liver attenuation in venous to portal venous phases multiplied by 100. Spearman's correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and DeLong tests evaluated their performance. Multiple logistic regression assessed independent contributions of ECV and VP-ER to fibrosis status.

Results: Fifty-three patients had no significant fibrosis (F0-F1) and 40 had significant fibrosis (F2-F3). ECV demonstrated a moderate correlation with fibrosis grade (r = 0.531, p < 0.0001), while VP-ER showed a weaker yet statistically significant correlation (r = 0.363, p = 0.0003). ROC analyses yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.698 for ECV (cut-off = 38%) and 0.763 for VP-ER (cut-off = 71%), with no significant difference between AUCs (p = 0.358). VP-ER accurately classified 70 patients, while ECV correctly predicted 65. Logistic regression revealed significant associations for both VP-ER (OR = 1.08; p = 0.007) and ECV (OR = 1.025; p = 0.0132), achieving 72.04% classification accuracy and an overall AUC of 0.756 (95% CI: 0.688-0.863).

Conclusion: ECV fraction and VP-ER demonstrated reliable, complementary capabilities for distinguishing non-significant fibrosis from significant fibrosis. Their combined use in routine multiphasic CT protocols may reduce dependence on invasive biopsy while offering robust sensitivity and specificity for early fibrosis assessment. Further studies including cirrhotic populations and larger cohorts are recommended.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CT增强率和细胞外体积预测肝纤维化的可靠性评估。
背景:可靠、无创的肝纤维化评估对早期疾病管理至关重要。基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的细胞外体积(ECV)分数和门静脉相增强率(VP-ER)显示出量化轻度至中度纤维化的潜力。本研究探讨了ECV和VP-ER在活检确诊患者中区分非显著纤维化(F0-F1)和显著纤维化(F2-F3)的诊断性能。方法:回顾性分析93例(20 ~ 72岁,男性56.9%)行肝活检和多期CT扫描的患者。排除METAVIR F4肝硬化或影像学/病理资料不完整的患者。取CT当天的红细胞压积水平。根据延迟期和增强期之间肝脏和主动脉衰减的差异计算ECV,并根据红细胞压积进行调整。VP-ER为静脉期与门静脉期肝脏衰减之比乘以100。Spearman相关、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和DeLong检验评估了他们的表现。多重逻辑回归评估了ECV和VP-ER对纤维化状态的独立贡献。结果:53例患者无明显纤维化(F0-F1), 40例患者有明显纤维化(F2-F3)。结论:ECV分数和VP-ER在区分非显著性纤维化和显著性纤维化方面表现出可靠的互补能力。它们在常规多相CT方案中的联合应用可以减少对侵入性活检的依赖,同时为早期纤维化评估提供强大的敏感性和特异性。建议进一步研究包括肝硬化人群和更大的队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Fecal incontinence as a hidden disorder among adults aged over 50 years. Development of a hemodynamic scoring system for acute pancreatitis: an exploratory approach to optimizing fluid resuscitation. Dysphagia is associated with major esophageal motility disorders in the UAE: a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary care center in Abu Dhabi. Global and regional disparities in the burden of disease and risk factors between pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. Citraconic acid mitigates radiation-induced intestinal injury by modulating IL-17 signaling to enhance epithelial regeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1