Reliability assessment of CT enhancement rate and extracellular volume in liver fibrosis prediction.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY BMC Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1186/s12876-025-03678-5
Faeze Salahshour, Aminreza Abkhoo, Sina Sadeghian, Masoomeh Safaei
{"title":"Reliability assessment of CT enhancement rate and extracellular volume in liver fibrosis prediction.","authors":"Faeze Salahshour, Aminreza Abkhoo, Sina Sadeghian, Masoomeh Safaei","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03678-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reliable, non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis is essential for early disease management. Computed tomography (CT)-based extracellular volume (ECV) fraction and portal venous phase enhancement rate (VP-ER) have shown potential in quantifying mild-to-moderate fibrosis. This study investigates the diagnostic performance of ECV and VP-ER in differentiating non-significant (F0-F1) from significant (F2-F3) fibrosis in biopsy-confirmed patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-three patients (20-72 years, 56.9% male) undergoing liver biopsy and multiphasic CT scans were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with METAVIR F4 cirrhosis or incomplete imaging/pathological data were excluded. Hematocrit levels were obtained on the day of CT. ECV was calculated from differences in liver and aortic attenuation between delayed and enhanced phases, adjusted for hematocrit. VP-ER was derived as the ratio of liver attenuation in venous to portal venous phases multiplied by 100. Spearman's correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and DeLong tests evaluated their performance. Multiple logistic regression assessed independent contributions of ECV and VP-ER to fibrosis status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three patients had no significant fibrosis (F0-F1) and 40 had significant fibrosis (F2-F3). ECV demonstrated a moderate correlation with fibrosis grade (r = 0.531, p < 0.0001), while VP-ER showed a weaker yet statistically significant correlation (r = 0.363, p = 0.0003). ROC analyses yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.698 for ECV (cut-off = 38%) and 0.763 for VP-ER (cut-off = 71%), with no significant difference between AUCs (p = 0.358). VP-ER accurately classified 70 patients, while ECV correctly predicted 65. Logistic regression revealed significant associations for both VP-ER (OR = 1.08; p = 0.007) and ECV (OR = 1.025; p = 0.0132), achieving 72.04% classification accuracy and an overall AUC of 0.756 (95% CI: 0.688-0.863).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECV fraction and VP-ER demonstrated reliable, complementary capabilities for distinguishing non-significant fibrosis from significant fibrosis. Their combined use in routine multiphasic CT protocols may reduce dependence on invasive biopsy while offering robust sensitivity and specificity for early fibrosis assessment. Further studies including cirrhotic populations and larger cohorts are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03678-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reliable, non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis is essential for early disease management. Computed tomography (CT)-based extracellular volume (ECV) fraction and portal venous phase enhancement rate (VP-ER) have shown potential in quantifying mild-to-moderate fibrosis. This study investigates the diagnostic performance of ECV and VP-ER in differentiating non-significant (F0-F1) from significant (F2-F3) fibrosis in biopsy-confirmed patients.

Methods: Ninety-three patients (20-72 years, 56.9% male) undergoing liver biopsy and multiphasic CT scans were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with METAVIR F4 cirrhosis or incomplete imaging/pathological data were excluded. Hematocrit levels were obtained on the day of CT. ECV was calculated from differences in liver and aortic attenuation between delayed and enhanced phases, adjusted for hematocrit. VP-ER was derived as the ratio of liver attenuation in venous to portal venous phases multiplied by 100. Spearman's correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and DeLong tests evaluated their performance. Multiple logistic regression assessed independent contributions of ECV and VP-ER to fibrosis status.

Results: Fifty-three patients had no significant fibrosis (F0-F1) and 40 had significant fibrosis (F2-F3). ECV demonstrated a moderate correlation with fibrosis grade (r = 0.531, p < 0.0001), while VP-ER showed a weaker yet statistically significant correlation (r = 0.363, p = 0.0003). ROC analyses yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.698 for ECV (cut-off = 38%) and 0.763 for VP-ER (cut-off = 71%), with no significant difference between AUCs (p = 0.358). VP-ER accurately classified 70 patients, while ECV correctly predicted 65. Logistic regression revealed significant associations for both VP-ER (OR = 1.08; p = 0.007) and ECV (OR = 1.025; p = 0.0132), achieving 72.04% classification accuracy and an overall AUC of 0.756 (95% CI: 0.688-0.863).

Conclusion: ECV fraction and VP-ER demonstrated reliable, complementary capabilities for distinguishing non-significant fibrosis from significant fibrosis. Their combined use in routine multiphasic CT protocols may reduce dependence on invasive biopsy while offering robust sensitivity and specificity for early fibrosis assessment. Further studies including cirrhotic populations and larger cohorts are recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the consistency of FIB-4, APRI, and GPR in evaluating significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in COVID-19 patients with concurrent liver diseases. Correction: Persistence of anemia in patients with Celiac disease despite a gluten free diet: a retrospective study. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT combined with contrast-enhanced MRI for colorectal liver metastases: a case-control study. Study of factors influencing the insertion failure of single balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP treatment after bilioenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis. The impact of probiotic supplementation on gastric motility and nutrient absorption in elderly patients with Gastrointestinal disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1