Prognosis and fertility of stage II to IV borderline ovarian tumors after fertility-sparing surgery.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101666
Guo Zheng, Yana Liu, Qian Wang, Meng Mao, Hanlin Fu, Lulu Si, Ye Zhang, Tianjiao Lai, Mengling Zhao, Danxia Chu, Ruixia Guo
{"title":"Prognosis and fertility of stage II to IV borderline ovarian tumors after fertility-sparing surgery.","authors":"Guo Zheng, Yana Liu, Qian Wang, Meng Mao, Hanlin Fu, Lulu Si, Ye Zhang, Tianjiao Lai, Mengling Zhao, Danxia Chu, Ruixia Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the prognosis and fertility of patients with stage II to IV borderline ovarian tumors who underwent fertility-sparing surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-institution study included patients aged <40 years with stage II to IV borderline ovarian tumors at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2007 and March 2023. The primary outcome was disease-free survival. The association of disease-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 patients were included in this study. Based on whether fertility-sparing surgery was performed, the patients were categorized into 2 groups: a fertility-sparing surgery group with 96 patients (66.67%) and a radical surgery group with 48 patients (33.3%). There were differences between the 2 groups in terms of age (27.36 ± 6.42 vs 34.67 ± 5.43, p < .001), pregnancy history (53.1%; 51/96) vs 81.2% (39/48), p = .001), maximum tumor diameter (103.00 [76.25, 148.25] vs 88.50 [60.25, 124.75], p = .011), involvement of bilateral ovaries (45.83%; [44/96] vs 66.67% [32/48], p = .018), and whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (15.6% [15/96] vs 31.2% [15/48], p = .030). The median follow-up time after primary cytoreduction was 67.0 months (interquartile range; 44.0-101.75). At the end of the observation period, 32 (22.2%) patients experienced recurrence. There were 3 (2.1%) deaths and 2 cases (1.4%) of survival with tumors. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that fertility-sparing surgery, incomplete cytoreduction, micropapillary subtype, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III, and invasive implants were independent risk factors for poor disease-free survival. Among the patients with fertility intentions (41 cases), 34 (82.9%) had successful pregnancies. Twenty-nine patients (70.7%) had successful births, and 3 patients were pregnant at the time of study completion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fertility-sparing surgery may be feasible and considered for patients lacking other significant risk factors for disease-free survival, including incomplete cytoreduction, micropapillary subtype, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III, and invasive implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"101666"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the prognosis and fertility of patients with stage II to IV borderline ovarian tumors who underwent fertility-sparing surgery.

Methods: This retrospective single-institution study included patients aged <40 years with stage II to IV borderline ovarian tumors at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2007 and March 2023. The primary outcome was disease-free survival. The association of disease-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods.

Results: A total of 144 patients were included in this study. Based on whether fertility-sparing surgery was performed, the patients were categorized into 2 groups: a fertility-sparing surgery group with 96 patients (66.67%) and a radical surgery group with 48 patients (33.3%). There were differences between the 2 groups in terms of age (27.36 ± 6.42 vs 34.67 ± 5.43, p < .001), pregnancy history (53.1%; 51/96) vs 81.2% (39/48), p = .001), maximum tumor diameter (103.00 [76.25, 148.25] vs 88.50 [60.25, 124.75], p = .011), involvement of bilateral ovaries (45.83%; [44/96] vs 66.67% [32/48], p = .018), and whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (15.6% [15/96] vs 31.2% [15/48], p = .030). The median follow-up time after primary cytoreduction was 67.0 months (interquartile range; 44.0-101.75). At the end of the observation period, 32 (22.2%) patients experienced recurrence. There were 3 (2.1%) deaths and 2 cases (1.4%) of survival with tumors. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that fertility-sparing surgery, incomplete cytoreduction, micropapillary subtype, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III, and invasive implants were independent risk factors for poor disease-free survival. Among the patients with fertility intentions (41 cases), 34 (82.9%) had successful pregnancies. Twenty-nine patients (70.7%) had successful births, and 3 patients were pregnant at the time of study completion.

Conclusions: Fertility-sparing surgery may be feasible and considered for patients lacking other significant risk factors for disease-free survival, including incomplete cytoreduction, micropapillary subtype, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III, and invasive implants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
Neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas: genomic insights, controversies in treatment strategies, and future directions: a NeCTuR study. Controversies in the Management of Mesonephric and Mesonephric-Like Adenocarcinomas of the Female Genital Tract. Controversies in vulvar cancer: revisiting the margin of error. Controversies in the management of ovarian granulosa cell and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors. Controversies in the management of rare gynecologic cancers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1