{"title":"Prognosis and fertility of stage II to IV borderline ovarian tumors after fertility-sparing surgery.","authors":"Guo Zheng, Yana Liu, Qian Wang, Meng Mao, Hanlin Fu, Lulu Si, Ye Zhang, Tianjiao Lai, Mengling Zhao, Danxia Chu, Ruixia Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the prognosis and fertility of patients with stage II to IV borderline ovarian tumors who underwent fertility-sparing surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-institution study included patients aged <40 years with stage II to IV borderline ovarian tumors at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2007 and March 2023. The primary outcome was disease-free survival. The association of disease-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 patients were included in this study. Based on whether fertility-sparing surgery was performed, the patients were categorized into 2 groups: a fertility-sparing surgery group with 96 patients (66.67%) and a radical surgery group with 48 patients (33.3%). There were differences between the 2 groups in terms of age (27.36 ± 6.42 vs 34.67 ± 5.43, p < .001), pregnancy history (53.1%; 51/96) vs 81.2% (39/48), p = .001), maximum tumor diameter (103.00 [76.25, 148.25] vs 88.50 [60.25, 124.75], p = .011), involvement of bilateral ovaries (45.83%; [44/96] vs 66.67% [32/48], p = .018), and whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (15.6% [15/96] vs 31.2% [15/48], p = .030). The median follow-up time after primary cytoreduction was 67.0 months (interquartile range; 44.0-101.75). At the end of the observation period, 32 (22.2%) patients experienced recurrence. There were 3 (2.1%) deaths and 2 cases (1.4%) of survival with tumors. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that fertility-sparing surgery, incomplete cytoreduction, micropapillary subtype, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III, and invasive implants were independent risk factors for poor disease-free survival. Among the patients with fertility intentions (41 cases), 34 (82.9%) had successful pregnancies. Twenty-nine patients (70.7%) had successful births, and 3 patients were pregnant at the time of study completion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fertility-sparing surgery may be feasible and considered for patients lacking other significant risk factors for disease-free survival, including incomplete cytoreduction, micropapillary subtype, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III, and invasive implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"101666"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the prognosis and fertility of patients with stage II to IV borderline ovarian tumors who underwent fertility-sparing surgery.
Methods: This retrospective single-institution study included patients aged <40 years with stage II to IV borderline ovarian tumors at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2007 and March 2023. The primary outcome was disease-free survival. The association of disease-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods.
Results: A total of 144 patients were included in this study. Based on whether fertility-sparing surgery was performed, the patients were categorized into 2 groups: a fertility-sparing surgery group with 96 patients (66.67%) and a radical surgery group with 48 patients (33.3%). There were differences between the 2 groups in terms of age (27.36 ± 6.42 vs 34.67 ± 5.43, p < .001), pregnancy history (53.1%; 51/96) vs 81.2% (39/48), p = .001), maximum tumor diameter (103.00 [76.25, 148.25] vs 88.50 [60.25, 124.75], p = .011), involvement of bilateral ovaries (45.83%; [44/96] vs 66.67% [32/48], p = .018), and whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (15.6% [15/96] vs 31.2% [15/48], p = .030). The median follow-up time after primary cytoreduction was 67.0 months (interquartile range; 44.0-101.75). At the end of the observation period, 32 (22.2%) patients experienced recurrence. There were 3 (2.1%) deaths and 2 cases (1.4%) of survival with tumors. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that fertility-sparing surgery, incomplete cytoreduction, micropapillary subtype, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III, and invasive implants were independent risk factors for poor disease-free survival. Among the patients with fertility intentions (41 cases), 34 (82.9%) had successful pregnancies. Twenty-nine patients (70.7%) had successful births, and 3 patients were pregnant at the time of study completion.
Conclusions: Fertility-sparing surgery may be feasible and considered for patients lacking other significant risk factors for disease-free survival, including incomplete cytoreduction, micropapillary subtype, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III, and invasive implants.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.