Evaluating the environmental justice dimensions of odor in Denver, Colorado

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1038/s41370-025-00760-8
Priyanka N. deSouza, Amanda Rees, Emilia Oscilowicz, Brendan Lawlor, William Obermann, Katherine Dickinson, Lisa M. McKenzie, Sheryl Magzamen, Shelly Miller, Michelle L. Bell
{"title":"Evaluating the environmental justice dimensions of odor in Denver, Colorado","authors":"Priyanka N. deSouza, Amanda Rees, Emilia Oscilowicz, Brendan Lawlor, William Obermann, Katherine Dickinson, Lisa M. McKenzie, Sheryl Magzamen, Shelly Miller, Michelle L. Bell","doi":"10.1038/s41370-025-00760-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Odors are a documented environmental justice challenge in Denver, Colorado. Complaints are an important modality through which residents express their concerns. We investigated disparities in environmental justice related-variables, such as home and workplace census block groups (race/ethnicity, education levels, renter-occupied housing, median income and median home values, gentrification) by locations of odor complaints as well as that of potential malodorous facilities. We report key themes identified in complaints. We obtained odor complaints for 2014–2023 and the locations of facilities required to submit an odor management plan as of 2023 from the Denver Department of Public Health and Environment. We downloaded residential census block group-level socioeconomic data from the 2016–2020 American Community Survey and workplace-based socioeconomic data from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics dataset for 2020. We assessed exposure to potential malodorous facilities and complaints within each census block group. We investigated exposure disparities by comparing distributions of environmental justice-related variables based on whether a complaint has been made against a facility, and census block group-level odor intensity categories. We used unsupervised machine learning to identify themes from the odor complaints. Less privileged census block groups were more likely to contain a potential malodorous facility. Importantly, our study also reveals disparities in the location of facilities, not just in traditional residence/-based environmental justice-related variables, but in workplace/-based factors as well. Our work points to the need to broaden our understanding of the structural racism forces that shape disparities from residential-based forces such as segregation to others such as access to transportation that result in workplace disparities. We did not observe similar disparities for odor complaints. Specific facilities were mentioned repeatedly in the complaints received.","PeriodicalId":15684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","volume":"36 1","pages":"67-76"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-025-00760-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Odors are a documented environmental justice challenge in Denver, Colorado. Complaints are an important modality through which residents express their concerns. We investigated disparities in environmental justice related-variables, such as home and workplace census block groups (race/ethnicity, education levels, renter-occupied housing, median income and median home values, gentrification) by locations of odor complaints as well as that of potential malodorous facilities. We report key themes identified in complaints. We obtained odor complaints for 2014–2023 and the locations of facilities required to submit an odor management plan as of 2023 from the Denver Department of Public Health and Environment. We downloaded residential census block group-level socioeconomic data from the 2016–2020 American Community Survey and workplace-based socioeconomic data from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics dataset for 2020. We assessed exposure to potential malodorous facilities and complaints within each census block group. We investigated exposure disparities by comparing distributions of environmental justice-related variables based on whether a complaint has been made against a facility, and census block group-level odor intensity categories. We used unsupervised machine learning to identify themes from the odor complaints. Less privileged census block groups were more likely to contain a potential malodorous facility. Importantly, our study also reveals disparities in the location of facilities, not just in traditional residence/-based environmental justice-related variables, but in workplace/-based factors as well. Our work points to the need to broaden our understanding of the structural racism forces that shape disparities from residential-based forces such as segregation to others such as access to transportation that result in workplace disparities. We did not observe similar disparities for odor complaints. Specific facilities were mentioned repeatedly in the complaints received.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估科罗拉多州丹佛市气味的环境正义维度。
背景:在科罗拉多州丹佛市,气味是一个记录在案的环境正义挑战。投诉是居民表达关切的重要方式。目的:我们调查了环境正义相关变量的差异,如家庭和工作场所人口普查群体(种族/民族、教育水平、租客居住的住房、收入中位数和房屋价值中位数、高档化),以及气味投诉地点和潜在恶臭设施的位置。我们报告投诉中确定的主要主题。方法:我们从丹佛市公共卫生与环境部获得了2014-2023年的气味投诉以及截至2023年需要提交气味管理计划的设施位置。我们从2016-2020年美国社区调查中下载了住宅人口普查区群体层面的社会经济数据,从2020年的纵向雇主-家庭动态数据集中下载了基于工作场所的社会经济数据。我们评估了每个人口普查区的潜在恶臭设施暴露情况和投诉情况。我们通过比较环境正义相关变量的分布来调查暴露差异,这些变量基于是否对设施提出投诉,以及人口普查街区群体水平的气味强度类别。我们使用无监督机器学习从气味投诉中识别主题。结果:较少特权的人口普查街区群体更有可能包含潜在的恶臭设施。重要的是,我们的研究还揭示了设施位置的差异,不仅在传统的基于居住/环境正义的相关变量中,而且在基于工作场所/因素中也是如此。我们的工作指出,需要扩大我们对结构性种族主义力量的理解,这些力量形成了从基于居住的力量(如隔离)到其他力量(如导致工作场所差异的交通工具)的差异。我们没有观察到气味投诉的类似差异。在收到的投诉中一再提到具体的设施。影响:我们的研究增加了越来越多的文献,这些文献使用潜在恶臭设施的位置和投诉作为代理,观察到暴露在气味中的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (JESEE) aims to be the premier and authoritative source of information on advances in exposure science for professionals in a wide range of environmental and public health disciplines. JESEE publishes original peer-reviewed research presenting significant advances in exposure science and exposure analysis, including development and application of the latest technologies for measuring exposures, and innovative computational approaches for translating novel data streams to characterize and predict exposures. The types of papers published in the research section of JESEE are original research articles, translation studies, and correspondence. Reported results should further understanding of the relationship between environmental exposure and human health, describe evaluated novel exposure science tools, or demonstrate potential of exposure science to enable decisions and actions that promote and protect human health.
期刊最新文献
Timing of puberty in girls and serum polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-albumin adduct levels: the California PAH Study Collection of multimedia measurements to evaluate PFAS human exposure sources in the residential environment Evaluation and comparison of tools used to quantify aggregate PFAS exposure: Extractable organic fluorine, PFAS burden scores and summed PFAS concentrations Identifying the known and unknown health hazard information for chemical disasters: a phased scoping review of the East Palestine, Ohio train derailment Birth weight in relation to maternal and neonatal biomarker concentration of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid: a meta-analysis and meta-regression from a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1