Independent Prognostic Significance of Myocardial Flow Reserve over Coronary Artery Calcium, Myocardial Perfusion, and Clinical Variables in Patients without Known CAD, according to Diabetes Status.
Su Nam Lee, Pankaj Malhotra, Robert J H Miller, Heidi Gransar, Sean W Hayes, John D Friedman, Louise E J Thomson, Alan Rozanski, Piotr J Slomka, Donghee Han, Daniel S Berman
{"title":"Independent Prognostic Significance of Myocardial Flow Reserve over Coronary Artery Calcium, Myocardial Perfusion, and Clinical Variables in Patients without Known CAD, according to Diabetes Status.","authors":"Su Nam Lee, Pankaj Malhotra, Robert J H Miller, Heidi Gransar, Sean W Hayes, John D Friedman, Louise E J Thomson, Alan Rozanski, Piotr J Slomka, Donghee Han, Daniel S Berman","doi":"10.1016/j.nuclcard.2025.102165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore differences in prevalence and prognosis associated with reduced myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD) based on diabetes status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 2,639 patients without known CAD who underwent rubidium positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), 818 patients (31%) had diabetes. Reduced MFR was defined as MFR <2.0. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) score was categorized as 0, 1-99, 100-399, and ≥ 400. Ischemic total perfusion deficit (TPD) was categorized as <1%, 1-<5%, and ≥ 5%. Outcome variables were all-cause death (ACD) and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During median follow-up of 4.1 year, 574 (21.8%) ACD/MI occurred (204 [25.1%] diabetic patients, 370 [20.3%] non-diabetic patients). In multivariable Cox analysis, reduced MFR was associated with increased ACD/MI in patients with diabetes (per 0.1 decrease: HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, P < 0.001) and patients without diabetes (per 0.1 decrease: HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.04, P < 0.001). No interaction existed between diabetes and MFR for ACD/MI risk regardless of CAC or ischemic burden (all p > 0.05). Adding MFR to the risk prediction model of clinical, conventional MPI findings, and CAC improved the discrimination for clinical outcomes in both groups (DM: 0.003, non-DM: <0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reduced MFR was more common in patients with diabetes and an important independent prognostic marker over CAC and clinical variables. The association between MFR and ACD/MI risk did not differ between patients with and without diabetes who had no prior CAD, regardless of CAC and ischemic burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":16476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"102165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2025.102165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore differences in prevalence and prognosis associated with reduced myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD) based on diabetes status.
Methods: Of 2,639 patients without known CAD who underwent rubidium positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), 818 patients (31%) had diabetes. Reduced MFR was defined as MFR <2.0. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) score was categorized as 0, 1-99, 100-399, and ≥ 400. Ischemic total perfusion deficit (TPD) was categorized as <1%, 1-<5%, and ≥ 5%. Outcome variables were all-cause death (ACD) and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI).
Results: During median follow-up of 4.1 year, 574 (21.8%) ACD/MI occurred (204 [25.1%] diabetic patients, 370 [20.3%] non-diabetic patients). In multivariable Cox analysis, reduced MFR was associated with increased ACD/MI in patients with diabetes (per 0.1 decrease: HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, P < 0.001) and patients without diabetes (per 0.1 decrease: HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.04, P < 0.001). No interaction existed between diabetes and MFR for ACD/MI risk regardless of CAC or ischemic burden (all p > 0.05). Adding MFR to the risk prediction model of clinical, conventional MPI findings, and CAC improved the discrimination for clinical outcomes in both groups (DM: 0.003, non-DM: <0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: Reduced MFR was more common in patients with diabetes and an important independent prognostic marker over CAC and clinical variables. The association between MFR and ACD/MI risk did not differ between patients with and without diabetes who had no prior CAD, regardless of CAC and ischemic burden.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology is the only journal in the world devoted to this dynamic and growing subspecialty. Physicians and technologists value the Journal not only for its peer-reviewed articles, but also for its timely discussions about the current and future role of nuclear cardiology. Original articles address all aspects of nuclear cardiology, including interpretation, diagnosis, imaging equipment, and use of radiopharmaceuticals. As the official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Journal also brings readers the latest information emerging from the Society''s task forces and publishes guidelines and position papers as they are adopted.