Alpha rhythm transcranial electrical stimulation to inferior parietal cortex increases alpha power and phase synchrony while attending to mind–body self-states

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.01.013
Zhongjie Bao , Paul Frewen
{"title":"Alpha rhythm transcranial electrical stimulation to inferior parietal cortex increases alpha power and phase synchrony while attending to mind–body self-states","authors":"Zhongjie Bao ,&nbsp;Paul Frewen","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Self-referential processing (SRP) refers to the human brain’s response to semantic and somatic self-related information. Recent developments in modulating semantic and somatic SRP using non-invasive brain stimulation supported the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in modulating alpha electroencephalography (alpha-EEG) during SRP. Meanwhile, although alpha transcranial alternating current stimulation (alpha-tACS) shows greater efficacy in modulating alpha-EEG, the efficacy of alpha-tACS for modulating alpha-EEG during SRP has not been evaluated. The current study investigates the effects of alpha-tACS compared to sham stimulation over the medial prefrontal cortex and the bilateral inferior parietal lobule on alpha-EEG during both semantic and somatic SRP in two separate experiments. Semantic SRP was provoked by introspection on life roles (e.g., “friend”), while somatic SRP was provoked by interoception upon sensations occurring in the exterior body (e.g., “shoulders”) during the experimental task, and alpha-EEG responses during SRP were compared to those occurring during resting state and an external attention control condition. Results indicated that while alpha-tACS to the medial prefrontal cortex did not produce significant source-level alpha-EEG changes, alpha-tACS to inferior parietal cortex increased alpha-EEG source power and phase synchrony when participants received real stimulation during the first experimental session. An exploratory analysis also indicated that real stimulation reduced alpha-EEG power during semantic but not somatic SRP during the first session but not the second session. Our results demonstrate that while alpha-tACS can modulate alpha-EEG during SRP, the effects may be dependent on the ordering of real vs. sham stimulation sessions and stimulation sites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":"570 ","pages":"Pages 173-184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452225000156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-referential processing (SRP) refers to the human brain’s response to semantic and somatic self-related information. Recent developments in modulating semantic and somatic SRP using non-invasive brain stimulation supported the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in modulating alpha electroencephalography (alpha-EEG) during SRP. Meanwhile, although alpha transcranial alternating current stimulation (alpha-tACS) shows greater efficacy in modulating alpha-EEG, the efficacy of alpha-tACS for modulating alpha-EEG during SRP has not been evaluated. The current study investigates the effects of alpha-tACS compared to sham stimulation over the medial prefrontal cortex and the bilateral inferior parietal lobule on alpha-EEG during both semantic and somatic SRP in two separate experiments. Semantic SRP was provoked by introspection on life roles (e.g., “friend”), while somatic SRP was provoked by interoception upon sensations occurring in the exterior body (e.g., “shoulders”) during the experimental task, and alpha-EEG responses during SRP were compared to those occurring during resting state and an external attention control condition. Results indicated that while alpha-tACS to the medial prefrontal cortex did not produce significant source-level alpha-EEG changes, alpha-tACS to inferior parietal cortex increased alpha-EEG source power and phase synchrony when participants received real stimulation during the first experimental session. An exploratory analysis also indicated that real stimulation reduced alpha-EEG power during semantic but not somatic SRP during the first session but not the second session. Our results demonstrate that while alpha-tACS can modulate alpha-EEG during SRP, the effects may be dependent on the ordering of real vs. sham stimulation sessions and stimulation sites.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Neurobiological mechanisms underlying coordinated actions in joint action. Discovering genetically-supported drug targets for multisite chronic pain through multi-omics Mendelian randomization and single-cell RNA-sequencing. Electroacupuncture restores maternal separation-induced glutamatergic presynaptic deficits of the medial prefrontal cortex in adulthood Event-Related Spectral Perturbations differences analyzed in standard-deviant tone sequences presented in a passive and active conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1