Results of an international survey on the management of therapeutic intensity unfractionated heparin: communication from the SSCs of the ISTH

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jtha.2025.02.012
Isabelle Gouin-Thibault , Lana A. Castellucci , Jean M. Connors , Michael Hardy , Alexandre Mansour , Virginie Siguret , Corinne Frere , Jerrold H. Levy , Adam Cuker , Thomas Lecompte , François Mullier
{"title":"Results of an international survey on the management of therapeutic intensity unfractionated heparin: communication from the SSCs of the ISTH","authors":"Isabelle Gouin-Thibault ,&nbsp;Lana A. Castellucci ,&nbsp;Jean M. Connors ,&nbsp;Michael Hardy ,&nbsp;Alexandre Mansour ,&nbsp;Virginie Siguret ,&nbsp;Corinne Frere ,&nbsp;Jerrold H. Levy ,&nbsp;Adam Cuker ,&nbsp;Thomas Lecompte ,&nbsp;François Mullier","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains the anticoagulant of choice in critically ill patients. However, its laboratory monitoring and clinical management are particularly challenging.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Our objective was to describe current practices and variations among centers of the ISTH.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between November 2023 and February 2024, we surveyed 142 clinicians and laboratory medicine specialists from 15 countries involved in the care of patients receiving therapeutic-intensity UFH.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>UFH monitoring was based on an anti-Xa assay or on activated partial thromboplastin time in 54% and 46% of respondents, respectively. Different therapeutic ranges were used depending on local protocols and indications; the 0.3 to 0.7 IU/mL anti-Xa range was commonly used, except for patients on mechanical circulatory support with a lower range, mostly 0.3 to 0.5 IU/mL. Most respondents managed therapeutic UFH administration with weight-based dosing (88%), while fewer used a nomogram (57%) for dose adjustment. When a nomogram was used, it was primarily based on anti-Xa monitoring (86%). The situations when respondents administered antithrombin varied widely; 22% reported using it when antithrombin levels were below 60 IU/dL(%) and 20% reported never using it.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our survey results revealed considerable heterogeneity in UFH management approaches, reflecting a knowledge gap and a paucity of evidence to guide decision-making. Key issues requiring well-designed up-to-date studies were identified that include optimal approaches to heparin monitoring, assays and reagents to be used, therapeutic range based on indications, the use of weight-adjusted nomograms for initial dosing and titrating of UFH infusion, and indications for antithrombin supplementation. Survey results provide a strong rationale for the development of international guidance addressing these issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"23 5","pages":"Pages 1717-1726"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538783625001084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains the anticoagulant of choice in critically ill patients. However, its laboratory monitoring and clinical management are particularly challenging.

Objectives

Our objective was to describe current practices and variations among centers of the ISTH.

Methods

Between November 2023 and February 2024, we surveyed 142 clinicians and laboratory medicine specialists from 15 countries involved in the care of patients receiving therapeutic-intensity UFH.

Results

UFH monitoring was based on an anti-Xa assay or on activated partial thromboplastin time in 54% and 46% of respondents, respectively. Different therapeutic ranges were used depending on local protocols and indications; the 0.3 to 0.7 IU/mL anti-Xa range was commonly used, except for patients on mechanical circulatory support with a lower range, mostly 0.3 to 0.5 IU/mL. Most respondents managed therapeutic UFH administration with weight-based dosing (88%), while fewer used a nomogram (57%) for dose adjustment. When a nomogram was used, it was primarily based on anti-Xa monitoring (86%). The situations when respondents administered antithrombin varied widely; 22% reported using it when antithrombin levels were below 60 IU/dL(%) and 20% reported never using it.

Conclusion

Our survey results revealed considerable heterogeneity in UFH management approaches, reflecting a knowledge gap and a paucity of evidence to guide decision-making. Key issues requiring well-designed up-to-date studies were identified that include optimal approaches to heparin monitoring, assays and reagents to be used, therapeutic range based on indications, the use of weight-adjusted nomograms for initial dosing and titrating of UFH infusion, and indications for antithrombin supplementation. Survey results provide a strong rationale for the development of international guidance addressing these issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于治疗强度非分数肝素管理的国际调查结果:来自 ISTH SSC 的通报。
未分离肝素(UFH)仍然是危重患者抗凝血的选择。然而,其实验室监测和临床管理尤其具有挑战性。在2023年11月至2024年2月期间,我们调查了来自15个国家的142名临床医生和实验室医学专家,他们参与了接受治疗强度UFH患者的护理。我们的目标是描述各中心目前的做法和变化。在54%和46%的应答者中,UFH监测分别基于抗xa测定或激活的部分凝血活素时间。根据当地治疗方案和适应症使用不同的治疗范围;常用的抗xa范围为0.3-0.7 IU/mL,除机械循环支持患者范围较低外,多为0.3-0.5 IU/mL。大多数应答者采用基于体重给药的治疗性UFH给药方法(88%),而较少的应答者(57%)使用nomogram给药方法进行剂量调整。当使用nomogram时,主要是基于抗xa监测(86%)。受访者使用抗凝血酶的情况差异很大;22%的人报告在抗凝血酶水平低于60IU/dL时使用它(%),20%的人报告从未使用它。我们的调查结果显示,在UFH管理方法中存在相当大的异质性,反映了知识差距和缺乏指导决策的证据。确定了需要精心设计的最新研究的关键问题,包括肝素监测的最佳方法、使用的测定方法和试剂、基于适应症的治疗范围、UFH输注初始给药和滴定时体重调整图的使用,以及抗凝血酶补充的适应症。调查结果为制定处理这些问题的国际指南提供了强有力的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
24.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community. Types of Publications: The journal publishes a variety of content, including: Original research reports State-of-the-art reviews Brief reports Case reports Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal Forum articles Correspondence Announcements Scope of Contributions: Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include: Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.
期刊最新文献
Sphingosine-1-phosphate regulates platelet fibrinogen binding via sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor type 4. Components of metabolic syndrome affect COVID-19 outcomes via platelet aggregation. Erratum to '2023 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria solid phase-based antiphospholipid antibody domain-collaborative efforts of Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking and ISTH SSC to harmonize enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and non-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay antiphospholipid antibody tests: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies': [Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Volume 23, Issue 1, January 2025, Pages 341-344]. Differential benefits of cold-stored and room-temperature platelets in bleeding trauma patients. Prevention and treatment of thrombosis in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1