Minimising morbidity in neck dissection: Avoiding routine carotid sheath removal in N0 and N+ necks without any evidence of clinical extranodal extension.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.01.005
Mohsina Hussain, Archana Singh, Richa Sharma, Sucheta Gandhe, Yogesh Pawar, H K Sonal, Vishal Rana, R Humsini, Saurabh Chandalia, Koustabh Kumar, Rajendra Dhondge, Raj Nagarkar, Sirshendu Roy, Onkar Kulkarni
{"title":"Minimising morbidity in neck dissection: Avoiding routine carotid sheath removal in N0 and N+ necks without any evidence of clinical extranodal extension.","authors":"Mohsina Hussain, Archana Singh, Richa Sharma, Sucheta Gandhe, Yogesh Pawar, H K Sonal, Vishal Rana, R Humsini, Saurabh Chandalia, Koustabh Kumar, Rajendra Dhondge, Raj Nagarkar, Sirshendu Roy, Onkar Kulkarni","doi":"10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The necessity of routine carotid sheath removal during neck dissections for head and neck carcinomas, particularly in clinically N0 and N+ necks without extranodal extension (ENE), remains debatable. This prospective study aimed to document the incidence of pathological involvement of the carotid sheath in such cases. A total of 121 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma underwent neck dissections with the carotid sheath left intact unless infiltration was suspected. Among these, only one patient (0.8%) exhibited carotid sheath involvement, while 120 (99.2%) did not. No regional recurrences were observed during a minimum follow up of six months. These findings suggest that routine resection of the carotid sheath is unnecessary during elective or therapeutic neck dissection for head and neck carcinomas, as it does not increase the risk of regional recurrence. Preserving the carotid sheath may therefore be a viable approach, potentially reducing surgical morbidity without compromising oncological outcomes. To the best of our knowledge, this study, which includes 121 patients and 145 necks, is the largest sample size to date to examine carotid sheath involvement in routine neck dissections.</p>","PeriodicalId":55318,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.01.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The necessity of routine carotid sheath removal during neck dissections for head and neck carcinomas, particularly in clinically N0 and N+ necks without extranodal extension (ENE), remains debatable. This prospective study aimed to document the incidence of pathological involvement of the carotid sheath in such cases. A total of 121 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma underwent neck dissections with the carotid sheath left intact unless infiltration was suspected. Among these, only one patient (0.8%) exhibited carotid sheath involvement, while 120 (99.2%) did not. No regional recurrences were observed during a minimum follow up of six months. These findings suggest that routine resection of the carotid sheath is unnecessary during elective or therapeutic neck dissection for head and neck carcinomas, as it does not increase the risk of regional recurrence. Preserving the carotid sheath may therefore be a viable approach, potentially reducing surgical morbidity without compromising oncological outcomes. To the best of our knowledge, this study, which includes 121 patients and 145 necks, is the largest sample size to date to examine carotid sheath involvement in routine neck dissections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons: • Leading articles on all aspects of surgery in the oro-facial and head and neck region • One of the largest circulations of any international journal in this field • Dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise.
期刊最新文献
Navigating treatment ambiguities in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of equivocal PET-CT findings and decision-making strategies following primary non-surgical treatment. Comment on "Clinical effectiveness of polynucleotide TMJ injection compared with physiotherapy: A 3-month randomised clinical trial". In reply to the comment on "Clinical effectiveness of polynucleotides TMJ injections compared to physiotherapy. A 3-month randomised clinical trial". Editorial Board Training and learning resources available for singly-qualified dental graduates entering into junior oral and maxillofacial surgery roles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1