Foundational concepts in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: A missing opportunity to address challenges in pharmacy practice.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.02.007
Ivana Guarrasi, Nick Hopwood, Andy Blunden, Daniel F B Wright, Megan Anakin
{"title":"Foundational concepts in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: A missing opportunity to address challenges in pharmacy practice.","authors":"Ivana Guarrasi, Nick Hopwood, Andy Blunden, Daniel F B Wright, Megan Anakin","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This commentary outlines the theoretical underpinnings of Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) and demonstrates its application to pharmacy practice. CHAT offers a comprehensive framework to address the complex challenges faced by pharmacists in an ever-evolving healthcare environment. CHAT provides pharmacy researchers with a different way of approaching and addressing practice research problems that appear to be resistant to traditional methods that may focus on cause and effect. This commentary introduces five of CHAT's foundational concepts: learning, activity, systems, culture, and change. CHAT emphasizes collective learning and the transformative potential of viewing contradictions within pharmacy practice as opportunities for innovative solutions and systemic change. By applying CHAT, pharmacists are encouraged to engage in the holistic examination of their work environments to address persistent problems and concerns. An application of CHAT in pharmacy is provided through an example where tensions arising from the introduction of electronic patient records and electronic prescribing systems were examined. This analysis shows how systemic contradictions can be leveraged to enhance pharmacist practice. A CHAT-informed solution differs from offering recommendations that involve individual-focused training to one that encompasses a wider professional development approach. By focusing on expansive learning and the co-creation of new practice models, CHAT provides a robust theoretical foundation for rethinking pharmacy practices in response to the complexities of contemporary healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.02.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This commentary outlines the theoretical underpinnings of Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) and demonstrates its application to pharmacy practice. CHAT offers a comprehensive framework to address the complex challenges faced by pharmacists in an ever-evolving healthcare environment. CHAT provides pharmacy researchers with a different way of approaching and addressing practice research problems that appear to be resistant to traditional methods that may focus on cause and effect. This commentary introduces five of CHAT's foundational concepts: learning, activity, systems, culture, and change. CHAT emphasizes collective learning and the transformative potential of viewing contradictions within pharmacy practice as opportunities for innovative solutions and systemic change. By applying CHAT, pharmacists are encouraged to engage in the holistic examination of their work environments to address persistent problems and concerns. An application of CHAT in pharmacy is provided through an example where tensions arising from the introduction of electronic patient records and electronic prescribing systems were examined. This analysis shows how systemic contradictions can be leveraged to enhance pharmacist practice. A CHAT-informed solution differs from offering recommendations that involve individual-focused training to one that encompasses a wider professional development approach. By focusing on expansive learning and the co-creation of new practice models, CHAT provides a robust theoretical foundation for rethinking pharmacy practices in response to the complexities of contemporary healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Outcomes of pharmacist-led patient education on oral anticoagulant therapy: A scoping review. Design and implementation of a risk-adapted, longitudinal, theory-driven medication adherence intervention: A protocol for a multi-phasic, hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. Artificial intelligence (AI) in pharmacovigilance: A systematic review on predicting adverse drug reactions (ADR) in hospitalized patients. Foundational concepts in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: A missing opportunity to address challenges in pharmacy practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1