Disclosure of elevated amyloid status is not associated with long-term suicidality in a preclinical AD trial

IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1002/alz.14623
Joshua D. Grill, Rema Raman, Charlene Flournoy, Karin Ernstrom, Aimee Pierce, Amanda Smith, Paul Rosenberg, Jeffrey Burns, Jason Karlawish, Paul Aisen, Karen Chilcott Holdridge, Michele Mancini, Reisa Sperling, David Sultzer, for the A4 Study Team
{"title":"Disclosure of elevated amyloid status is not associated with long-term suicidality in a preclinical AD trial","authors":"Joshua D. Grill,&nbsp;Rema Raman,&nbsp;Charlene Flournoy,&nbsp;Karin Ernstrom,&nbsp;Aimee Pierce,&nbsp;Amanda Smith,&nbsp;Paul Rosenberg,&nbsp;Jeffrey Burns,&nbsp;Jason Karlawish,&nbsp;Paul Aisen,&nbsp;Karen Chilcott Holdridge,&nbsp;Michele Mancini,&nbsp;Reisa Sperling,&nbsp;David Sultzer,&nbsp;for the A4 Study Team","doi":"10.1002/alz.14623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>The long-term implications of disclosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker information to cognitively unimpaired individuals are unknown.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>We compared participants who disclosed their elevated amyloid imaging result in a preclinical AD trial to those who disclosed a not elevated result and enrolled in an observational cohort that underwent parallel assessments. Our primary outcome was a score &gt; 0 on the Columbia Suicidality Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) at any visit; we also considered suicidal behaviors (CSSRS &gt; 5).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Among 1707 total participants (68% elevated amyloid, mean [standard deviation] age 71.5 [4.7], 60% female, 90% non-Hispanic White), followed for a mean 218 (74.1) weeks, there were no suicides and few indications of suicidal thoughts (<i>n</i> = 124 [7%]) or behaviors (<i>n</i> = 13 [&lt;1%]). In a generalized estimating equation model controlling for covariates, we observed no effect of amyloid status on the primary outcome of CSSRS &gt; 0 (odds ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.76, 3.37).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>With a structured approach, brain amyloid results can be returned safely.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's study was among the first and largest studies to include biomarker disclosure in a population without cognitive impairment.</li>\n \n <li>Routine psychological assessment provided a novel assessment of the impact of disclosure in this sample.</li>\n \n <li>Learning an elevated brain amyloid result through a protocolized approach was not associated with suicidal thoughts or behaviors compared to a matched cohort who learned they did not have elevated brain amyloid.</li>\n \n <li>Future research will be needed to ensure similar safety in more real-world settings.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.14623","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.14623","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The long-term implications of disclosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker information to cognitively unimpaired individuals are unknown.

METHODS

We compared participants who disclosed their elevated amyloid imaging result in a preclinical AD trial to those who disclosed a not elevated result and enrolled in an observational cohort that underwent parallel assessments. Our primary outcome was a score > 0 on the Columbia Suicidality Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) at any visit; we also considered suicidal behaviors (CSSRS > 5).

RESULTS

Among 1707 total participants (68% elevated amyloid, mean [standard deviation] age 71.5 [4.7], 60% female, 90% non-Hispanic White), followed for a mean 218 (74.1) weeks, there were no suicides and few indications of suicidal thoughts (n = 124 [7%]) or behaviors (n = 13 [<1%]). In a generalized estimating equation model controlling for covariates, we observed no effect of amyloid status on the primary outcome of CSSRS > 0 (odds ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.76, 3.37).

DISCUSSION

With a structured approach, brain amyloid results can be returned safely.

Highlights

  • The Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's study was among the first and largest studies to include biomarker disclosure in a population without cognitive impairment.
  • Routine psychological assessment provided a novel assessment of the impact of disclosure in this sample.
  • Learning an elevated brain amyloid result through a protocolized approach was not associated with suicidal thoughts or behaviors compared to a matched cohort who learned they did not have elevated brain amyloid.
  • Future research will be needed to ensure similar safety in more real-world settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一项阿尔茨海默病临床前试验中,淀粉样蛋白状态升高的披露与长期自杀无关
向认知未受损个体披露阿尔茨海默病(AD)生物标志物信息的长期影响尚不清楚。方法:我们将在临床前AD试验中披露其淀粉样蛋白成像结果升高的参与者与未披露其淀粉样蛋白成像结果升高的参与者进行比较,并纳入观察性队列进行平行评估。我们的主要结果是评分>;在任何一次访问中,哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(CSSRS)得分为0;我们还考虑了自杀行为(CSSRS >;结果在1707名参与者中(68%淀粉样蛋白升高,平均[标准差]年龄71.5[4.7],60%女性,90%非西班牙裔白人),平均随访218(74.1)周,没有自杀,很少有自杀念头(n = 124[7%])或自杀行为(n = 13 [<1%])。在控制协变量的广义估计方程模型中,我们观察到淀粉样蛋白状态对CSSRS的主要结局没有影响。0(优势比= 1.6,95%可信区间= 0.76,3.37)。采用结构化方法,脑淀粉样蛋白检查结果可以安全返回。抗淀粉样蛋白治疗在无症状阿尔茨海默氏症的研究是第一个也是最大的研究,包括在没有认知障碍的人群中披露生物标志物。常规的心理评估提供了一个新的评估,在这个样本披露的影响。与得知自己脑淀粉样蛋白没有升高的匹配队列相比,通过协议化方法得知脑淀粉样蛋白升高的结果与自杀念头或行为无关。未来的研究需要在更多的现实环境中确保类似的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
Part the Cloud grants $11 million to develop innovative treatments Vagus nerve stimulation alters task-evoked pupillary responses in older but not younger adults: A single-blind active sham-controlled crossover trial Development and validation of novel cognitive tests in Mandarin-speaking older Americans Spatially resolved transcriptomic profiling identifies distinct signatures in parenchymal and vascular microenvironments in Alzheimer's Disease with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy The partnership between the Alzheimer's Association, Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs), and the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) in advancing Alzheimer's disease research and care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1