Postoperative outcomes in patients operated for extra- and intracapsular hip fractures - a secondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08404-6
Shams Dakhil, Ane Djuv, Ingvild Saltvedt, Torgeir Bruun Wyller, Frede Frihagen, Lars Gunnar Johnsen, Kristin Taraldsen, Jorunn L Helbostad, Leiv Otto Watne, Aksel Paulsen
{"title":"Postoperative outcomes in patients operated for extra- and intracapsular hip fractures - a secondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Shams Dakhil, Ane Djuv, Ingvild Saltvedt, Torgeir Bruun Wyller, Frede Frihagen, Lars Gunnar Johnsen, Kristin Taraldsen, Jorunn L Helbostad, Leiv Otto Watne, Aksel Paulsen","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08404-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hip fractures are among the most common and serious injuries in older adults. There has been a perception that extracapsular hip fractures have worse outcome than intracapsular hip fractures. We aimed to examine postoperative outcomes in patients operated for extra- and intracapsular hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of orthogeriatric care. Bivariate analyses were conducted, comparing patients with extracapsular fracture to patients with intracapsular fracture. Mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), new nursing home admissions, operative data and measures of functional and cognitive performance were assessed as endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary analysis included 711 patients; 283 patients had an extracapsular fracture and 428 an intracapsular fracture. At four months follow-up, the intracapsular fracture group had significantly better Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) (5.0 vs. 4.0, p = 0.007), personal Activities of Daily Living (p-ADL) (17.0 vs. 16.0, p = 0.007) and instrumental ADL (i-ADL) (32.5 vs. 28.0, p = 0.049). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with an extracapsular fracture had worse mobility and ADL levels four months postoperatively, but there were no clinically relevant differences at 12 months postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08404-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hip fractures are among the most common and serious injuries in older adults. There has been a perception that extracapsular hip fractures have worse outcome than intracapsular hip fractures. We aimed to examine postoperative outcomes in patients operated for extra- and intracapsular hip fractures.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of orthogeriatric care. Bivariate analyses were conducted, comparing patients with extracapsular fracture to patients with intracapsular fracture. Mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), new nursing home admissions, operative data and measures of functional and cognitive performance were assessed as endpoints.

Results: The primary analysis included 711 patients; 283 patients had an extracapsular fracture and 428 an intracapsular fracture. At four months follow-up, the intracapsular fracture group had significantly better Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) (5.0 vs. 4.0, p = 0.007), personal Activities of Daily Living (p-ADL) (17.0 vs. 16.0, p = 0.007) and instrumental ADL (i-ADL) (32.5 vs. 28.0, p = 0.049). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at 12 months.

Conclusions: Patients with an extracapsular fracture had worse mobility and ADL levels four months postoperatively, but there were no clinically relevant differences at 12 months postoperatively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋关节囊外和囊内骨折手术患者的术后结果——两项随机对照试验的二次分析。
背景:髋部骨折是老年人最常见和最严重的损伤之一。有一种观点认为髋关节囊外骨折比髋关节囊内骨折的预后更差。我们的目的是检查髋关节囊外和囊内骨折患者的术后结果。方法:这是对两项评估骨科护理效果的随机对照试验数据的二次分析。进行双变量分析,比较囊外骨折患者和囊内骨折患者。死亡率、住院时间(LOS)、新疗养院入院、手术数据以及功能和认知表现的测量作为终点进行评估。结果:初步分析纳入711例患者;283例发生囊外骨折,428例发生囊内骨折。在四个月的随访中,囊内骨折组的短物理性能电池(SPPB) (5.0 vs. 4.0, p = 0.007),个人日常生活活动(p-ADL) (17.0 vs. 16.0, p = 0.007)和工具ADL (i-ADL) (32.5 vs. 28.0, p = 0.049)明显更好。12个月时两组间无统计学差异。结论:囊外骨折患者术后4个月活动能力和ADL水平较差,但术后12个月无临床相关差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of telerehabilitation in upper limb musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Impact and prevention of sedentary behavior on musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace: a meta-analysis and LDA topic model. Association between hip abductor muscle strength and mobility limitation (locally defined as locomotive syndrome) in community-dwelling adults undergoing osteoporosis screening: a cross-sectional study. Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and systemic inflammation: a retrospective cohort study. Outcomes after contact and distance elbow arthrodesis: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1