Massimo Filippi, Alma Ghirelli, Edoardo Gioele Spinelli, Federica Agosta
{"title":"A comprehensive update on neuroimaging endpoints in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.","authors":"Massimo Filippi, Alma Ghirelli, Edoardo Gioele Spinelli, Federica Agosta","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2470324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>. There are currently few treatments approved for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Additionally, there remains a significant unmet need for reliable, standardized biomarkers to assess endpoints in clinical trials. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- and positron emission tomography (PET)-derived metrics could help in patient selection and stratification, shortening trial duration and reducing costs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review focuses on the potential use of neuroimaging endpoints in the context of ALS therapeutic trials, providing insights on structural and functional neuroimaging, plexus and muscle alterations, glial involvement and neuroinflammation, envisioning how these surrogates of disease progression could be implemented in clinical trials. A PubMed search covering the past 15 years was performed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Neuroimaging is essential in understanding ALS pathophysiology, aiding in disease progression tracking and evaluating therapeutic interventions. High costs, limited accessibility, lack of standardization, and patient tolerability limit their use in routine ALS care. Addressing these obstacles is essential for fully harnessing neuroimaging potential in improving diagnostics and treatment in ALS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2470324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: . There are currently few treatments approved for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Additionally, there remains a significant unmet need for reliable, standardized biomarkers to assess endpoints in clinical trials. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- and positron emission tomography (PET)-derived metrics could help in patient selection and stratification, shortening trial duration and reducing costs.
Areas covered: This review focuses on the potential use of neuroimaging endpoints in the context of ALS therapeutic trials, providing insights on structural and functional neuroimaging, plexus and muscle alterations, glial involvement and neuroinflammation, envisioning how these surrogates of disease progression could be implemented in clinical trials. A PubMed search covering the past 15 years was performed.
Expert opinion: Neuroimaging is essential in understanding ALS pathophysiology, aiding in disease progression tracking and evaluating therapeutic interventions. High costs, limited accessibility, lack of standardization, and patient tolerability limit their use in routine ALS care. Addressing these obstacles is essential for fully harnessing neuroimaging potential in improving diagnostics and treatment in ALS.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points