A Multi-Center Randomized Study Assessing If Validated Short Videos Improve Sinus Education.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1177/00034894251322653
Christopher Eric Bailey, Cristina Cabrera-Muffly, Philip G Chen, Nyssa Farrell, Sanjeet V Rangarajan, Michael Yim, Joseph Irish, Christopher H Le, Eugene H Chang
{"title":"A Multi-Center Randomized Study Assessing If Validated Short Videos Improve Sinus Education.","authors":"Christopher Eric Bailey, Cristina Cabrera-Muffly, Philip G Chen, Nyssa Farrell, Sanjeet V Rangarajan, Michael Yim, Joseph Irish, Christopher H Le, Eugene H Chang","doi":"10.1177/00034894251322653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if a short 10-minute video of either CT images (Video1: V1) or CT and endoscopic surgical videos (Video 2: V2) could be used to improve sinonasal anatomy knowledge in medical students (Med) and otolaryngology residents (OtoR).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>YouTube is a widely used platform for surgical training, yet many educational videos are of poor quality. We developed and validated two 10-minute narrated videos of sinus anatomy, the first (V1) incorporated CT images of critical structures while the second (V2) combined CT images and surgical endoscopic video. In tandem, we developed a sinonasal assessment used to test sinonasal anatomy, surgical landmarks, and situational awareness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicenter, randomized IRB-approved educational study evaluating the efficacy of the V1 and V2 videos by comparing pre-test (PrT) and post-test (PoT) scores in Med and OtoR subject groups. Subjects then watched the alternate video and preferences were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 Med and 37 OtoR successfully completed the study at 6 different institutions. There were significant differences in pre-test knowledge with OtoR scoring higher than Med in all 3 pre-test subdomains [(S1: 4.3 v s2.9, <i>P</i> < .0001, S2: 4.4 vs 3.1, <i>P</i> < .0001, and S3: 4.6 vs 3.2, <i>P</i> < .0001)]. In the Med group, both V1 and V2 educational videos significantly improved post-test scores compared to pre-test scores (V1: 10.06 vs 12.59, <i>P</i> = .0005; V2: 8.23 vs 11.08, <i>P</i> = .0008). In the OtoR group, only the V2 educational video showed significant improvement (13.24 vs 14.76, <i>P</i> < .0001). Both groups thought the videos were helpful and improved their spatial awareness of sinus anatomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short, validated videos significantly improve sinonasal education and should be incorporated in modern training programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"455-458"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251322653","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if a short 10-minute video of either CT images (Video1: V1) or CT and endoscopic surgical videos (Video 2: V2) could be used to improve sinonasal anatomy knowledge in medical students (Med) and otolaryngology residents (OtoR).

Background: YouTube is a widely used platform for surgical training, yet many educational videos are of poor quality. We developed and validated two 10-minute narrated videos of sinus anatomy, the first (V1) incorporated CT images of critical structures while the second (V2) combined CT images and surgical endoscopic video. In tandem, we developed a sinonasal assessment used to test sinonasal anatomy, surgical landmarks, and situational awareness.

Methods: We performed a multicenter, randomized IRB-approved educational study evaluating the efficacy of the V1 and V2 videos by comparing pre-test (PrT) and post-test (PoT) scores in Med and OtoR subject groups. Subjects then watched the alternate video and preferences were assessed.

Results: A total of 30 Med and 37 OtoR successfully completed the study at 6 different institutions. There were significant differences in pre-test knowledge with OtoR scoring higher than Med in all 3 pre-test subdomains [(S1: 4.3 v s2.9, P < .0001, S2: 4.4 vs 3.1, P < .0001, and S3: 4.6 vs 3.2, P < .0001)]. In the Med group, both V1 and V2 educational videos significantly improved post-test scores compared to pre-test scores (V1: 10.06 vs 12.59, P = .0005; V2: 8.23 vs 11.08, P = .0008). In the OtoR group, only the V2 educational video showed significant improvement (13.24 vs 14.76, P < .0001). Both groups thought the videos were helpful and improved their spatial awareness of sinus anatomy.

Conclusions: Short, validated videos significantly improve sinonasal education and should be incorporated in modern training programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项多中心随机研究评估验证短视频是否能改善鼻窦教育。
目的:背景:YouTube 是一个广泛用于外科培训的平台,但许多教学视频质量不佳:背景:YouTube 是一个广泛使用的外科培训平台,但许多教学视频质量不佳。我们开发并验证了两个 10 分钟的鼻窦解剖解说视频,第一个视频(V1)结合了关键结构的 CT 图像,第二个视频(V2)结合了 CT 图像和手术内窥镜视频。与此同时,我们还开发了一种鼻窦评估方法,用于测试鼻窦解剖、手术地标和情景意识:我们进行了一项经 IRB 批准的多中心随机教育研究,通过比较医学和耳鼻喉科受试者组的测试前(PrT)和测试后(PoT)得分,评估 V1 和 V2 视频的效果。受试者随后观看了备用视频,并对喜好进行了评估:结果:在 6 所不同的院校中,共有 30 名中学生和 37 名外科医生成功完成了这项研究。受试者在测试前的知识水平存在明显差异,在测试前的所有 3 个子领域中,OtoR 的得分均高于 Med[(S1:4.3 vs s2.9,P P P = .0005;V2:8.23 vs 11.08,P = .0008)。在 OtoR 组中,只有 V2 教育视频显示出显著的改善(13.24 vs 14.76,P 结论:短的、经过验证的视频能显著改善窦性心动过缓:经过验证的简短视频能明显改善鼻窦教育,应纳入现代培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor on "Perioperative Outcomes of Branchial Cleft Sinus Tract Excision in Pediatric Patients Without the Use of Intraoperative Dye". Response to Letter to the Editor on "Perioperative Outcomes of Branchial Cleft Sinus Tract Excision in Pediatric Patients Without the Use of Intraoperative Dye". Unilateral Clear Thin Rhinorrhea: How Often Is It a Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak? Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) After Pediatric Tonsillectomy: An Opportunity for Quality Improvement. Tracheobronchial Foreign Body Extraction in a Preterm Infant via Choledochoscope: A Case Report and Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1