How Organisational Dynamics Impact Decision Latitude, Social Support, Self-Identity Through Work and Job Insecurity for Nurse Practitioners

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1111/jan.16842
Isabella Wright, Anja Vorster, Eamon Merrick
{"title":"How Organisational Dynamics Impact Decision Latitude, Social Support, Self-Identity Through Work and Job Insecurity for Nurse Practitioners","authors":"Isabella Wright,&nbsp;Anja Vorster,&nbsp;Eamon Merrick","doi":"10.1111/jan.16842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To identify whether nurse practitioners (NPs) in New Zealand (NZ) have the organisational opportunities to make decisions related to performing their role.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study of self-reported decision-making, social support, psychosocial demands and identification with role in a representative population of NPs employed in a range of practice settings in NZ.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study utilised the internationally validated Job Content Questionnaire. Reliability and construct validity were assessed using co-efficient α and confirmatory factor analysis. Linear regression analyses were conducted to understand the strength and direction of the relationships between the constructs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All scales demonstrated acceptable levels of internal reliability. Factor analysis supported a five-factor model, with <i>decision latitude, psychological job demands, co-worker support, supervisor support</i> and <i>job insecurity</i> as the main factors fitting the theoretical model. Regression models suggested that NPs (<i>n</i> = 169) have more control over their decision-making when supported by their colleagues rather than supervisors. NPs perceive improved relationships with healthcare consumers if they feel an increase in support from their colleagues; this relationship is mediated by the freedom to make decisions. NPs in rural settings had more job security when they felt valued and appreciated at work.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The presence of collegial support significantly influences the freedom and autonomy of NPs in making decisions. Workforce policy, the organisation of practice and vocational training may be effective ways of helping NPs expand access to healthcare services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for the Profession and Patient Care</h3>\n \n <p>Collegial and supervisory support are critical for NPs to work to their full scope. A funded, first-year-in-practice vocational training program designed to support role transition, foster collegial support and build a community of practice for newly qualified NPs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>For the first time, nurse practitioner decision-making and autonomy determinants have been described in NZ. These findings should be considered within the context of international evidence and in global nursing workforce policies that seek to create opportunities for NPs to work to the limit of their scope.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>The authors have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines—STROBE checklist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>No patient or public contribution.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"81 12","pages":"8704-8713"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jan.16842","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To identify whether nurse practitioners (NPs) in New Zealand (NZ) have the organisational opportunities to make decisions related to performing their role.

Design

A cross-sectional study of self-reported decision-making, social support, psychosocial demands and identification with role in a representative population of NPs employed in a range of practice settings in NZ.

Methods

This study utilised the internationally validated Job Content Questionnaire. Reliability and construct validity were assessed using co-efficient α and confirmatory factor analysis. Linear regression analyses were conducted to understand the strength and direction of the relationships between the constructs.

Results

All scales demonstrated acceptable levels of internal reliability. Factor analysis supported a five-factor model, with decision latitude, psychological job demands, co-worker support, supervisor support and job insecurity as the main factors fitting the theoretical model. Regression models suggested that NPs (n = 169) have more control over their decision-making when supported by their colleagues rather than supervisors. NPs perceive improved relationships with healthcare consumers if they feel an increase in support from their colleagues; this relationship is mediated by the freedom to make decisions. NPs in rural settings had more job security when they felt valued and appreciated at work.

Conclusion

The presence of collegial support significantly influences the freedom and autonomy of NPs in making decisions. Workforce policy, the organisation of practice and vocational training may be effective ways of helping NPs expand access to healthcare services.

Implications for the Profession and Patient Care

Collegial and supervisory support are critical for NPs to work to their full scope. A funded, first-year-in-practice vocational training program designed to support role transition, foster collegial support and build a community of practice for newly qualified NPs.

Impact

For the first time, nurse practitioner decision-making and autonomy determinants have been described in NZ. These findings should be considered within the context of international evidence and in global nursing workforce policies that seek to create opportunities for NPs to work to the limit of their scope.

Reporting Method

The authors have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines—STROBE checklist.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织动力学如何影响护士从业人员的决策纬度、社会支持、工作自我认同和工作不安全感
确定是否护士从业人员(NPs)在新西兰(NZ)有组织的机会作出决策有关履行其职责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
The effects of clinical learning environment and career adaptability on resilience: A mediating analysis based on a survey of nursing interns. Correlation of psychological resilience with social support and coping style in Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional study. The Mediating Role of Spirituality in Delineating the Interconnection Between Self-Efficacy and Resilience Among the Parents of Children With Newly Diagnosed Diabetes: A Community Nursing-Led Cross-Sectional Study. Men in Nursing: Let's Talk. Exploring Nursing Implications in the Standards of Care for Transgender and Gender Diverse Health, Version 8 by Coleman et al. (2022).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1