Heteronormativity and cisgenderism in medical training: A scoping review of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and plus (LGBTQ+) issues in medical training in Asia

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117822
Yiu Tung Suen , Eliz Miu Yin Wong , Randolph C.H. Chan , Suchon Tepjan , Peter A. Newman
{"title":"Heteronormativity and cisgenderism in medical training: A scoping review of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and plus (LGBTQ+) issues in medical training in Asia","authors":"Yiu Tung Suen ,&nbsp;Eliz Miu Yin Wong ,&nbsp;Randolph C.H. Chan ,&nbsp;Suchon Tepjan ,&nbsp;Peter A. Newman","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and plus (LGBTQ+) related health concerns in medical training have historically been underrepresented or largely omitted. This review goes beyond the Global North and is one of the first scoping reviews to take a regional approach to understanding LGBTQ+ issues in medical training in Asia, a region that millions of LGBTQ+ people call home. A scoping review of peer-reviewed articles published from 2000 to 2024 on LGBTQ+ issues in medical training (including medical, nursing and dentistry) in Asia was conducted. A diversity of attitudes towards LGBTQ+ issues were found among medical, dental, and nursing students. Negative attitudes, especially pathologization of LGBTQ+ people, were still evident. Despite receiving inadequate training from their medical curriculum, students generally showed a strong eagerness to learn more about LGBTQ+ healthcare to know how to act professionally. Although LGBTQ+ students perceived a supportive environment among their peers, there were constant worries about how they were perceived as doctors by attending physicians and patients. Medical, dental, and nursing educators in the identified studies had minimal knowledge of LGBTQ+ issues and limited experience working with LGBTQ+ patients. Articles found that LGBTQ+ issues were lacking in the formal medical curriculum, with very little consideration beyond strictly biomedical concerns. Importantly, this paper debunks the idea that Asia is uniformly negative and conservative on LGBTQ+ issues, highlights the importance of regionally and culturally specific factors in understanding the medical training environment, and provides suggestions for practice and further research. Altogether, this paper argues that there is an urgent need and a substantial opportunity to make medical training in Asia more LGBTQ+ inclusive.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"370 ","pages":"Article 117822"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625001510","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and plus (LGBTQ+) related health concerns in medical training have historically been underrepresented or largely omitted. This review goes beyond the Global North and is one of the first scoping reviews to take a regional approach to understanding LGBTQ+ issues in medical training in Asia, a region that millions of LGBTQ+ people call home. A scoping review of peer-reviewed articles published from 2000 to 2024 on LGBTQ+ issues in medical training (including medical, nursing and dentistry) in Asia was conducted. A diversity of attitudes towards LGBTQ+ issues were found among medical, dental, and nursing students. Negative attitudes, especially pathologization of LGBTQ+ people, were still evident. Despite receiving inadequate training from their medical curriculum, students generally showed a strong eagerness to learn more about LGBTQ+ healthcare to know how to act professionally. Although LGBTQ+ students perceived a supportive environment among their peers, there were constant worries about how they were perceived as doctors by attending physicians and patients. Medical, dental, and nursing educators in the identified studies had minimal knowledge of LGBTQ+ issues and limited experience working with LGBTQ+ patients. Articles found that LGBTQ+ issues were lacking in the formal medical curriculum, with very little consideration beyond strictly biomedical concerns. Importantly, this paper debunks the idea that Asia is uniformly negative and conservative on LGBTQ+ issues, highlights the importance of regionally and culturally specific factors in understanding the medical training environment, and provides suggestions for practice and further research. Altogether, this paper argues that there is an urgent need and a substantial opportunity to make medical training in Asia more LGBTQ+ inclusive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学培训中的异性恋和顺性别主义:亚洲医学培训中女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿和同性恋(LGBTQ+)问题的范围审查
在医学培训中,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿和同性恋(LGBTQ+)相关的健康问题历来没有得到充分的代表或在很大程度上被忽略。这篇综述超越了全球北方,是第一批采取区域方法来理解亚洲医疗培训中LGBTQ+问题的范围性综述之一,亚洲是数百万LGBTQ+人群的家园。对2000年至2024年发表的关于亚洲医疗培训(包括医疗、护理和牙科)中LGBTQ+问题的同行评议文章进行了范围审查。医学、牙科和护理专业的学生对LGBTQ+问题的态度存在差异。负面态度,尤其是对LGBTQ+人群的病态化,仍然很明显。尽管从医学课程中接受的培训不足,但学生们普遍表现出强烈的渴望,想要了解更多关于LGBTQ+医疗保健的知识,以了解如何专业行事。尽管LGBTQ+学生在同龄人中感受到一种支持性的环境,但他们一直担心主治医生和病人会如何看待他们作为医生。在被确定的研究中,医学、牙科和护理教育者对LGBTQ+问题的了解很少,与LGBTQ+患者的工作经验也很有限。文章发现,在正式的医学课程中,LGBTQ+问题是缺乏的,除了严格的生物医学问题之外,很少有考虑。重要的是,本文揭穿了亚洲在LGBTQ+问题上普遍消极和保守的观点,强调了区域和文化特定因素在理解医学培训环境中的重要性,并为实践和进一步研究提供了建议。综上所述,本文认为亚洲医疗培训的LGBTQ+包容性是迫切需要和巨大的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
What counts as need? A qualitative study exploring perceptions of sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings Unpacking sociopolitical determinants of suicide in networked movements: Exposure to protest suicides in Hong Kong Advancing the concept of community positive health through participatory research in marginalized communities in Kenya “I thought I could postpartum-proof my experience”: Embodying, resisting, and negotiating medicalization online Synergies of participatory mapping and health geography: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1