Treatment efficiency and quality improvement via double imaging modality (DIM) versus single imaging modality (SIM) image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer
Milad Mirzaei , Suki Gill , Mahsheed Sabet , Martin A. Ebert , Pejman Rowshanfarzad , Jake Kendrick , Angela Jacques , Clare Herbert , Jeremy Croker , Sean Bydder , Joshua Dass , Edward Bailey , Rohen White , Catherine Moffat , Colin Tang , Adriano Polpo , Nicholas Bucknell
{"title":"Treatment efficiency and quality improvement via double imaging modality (DIM) versus single imaging modality (SIM) image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer","authors":"Milad Mirzaei , Suki Gill , Mahsheed Sabet , Martin A. Ebert , Pejman Rowshanfarzad , Jake Kendrick , Angela Jacques , Clare Herbert , Jeremy Croker , Sean Bydder , Joshua Dass , Edward Bailey , Rohen White , Catherine Moffat , Colin Tang , Adriano Polpo , Nicholas Bucknell","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer reduces treatment-related toxicity. However, positional and anatomical variations can result in patient re-setup, increased treatment time, and additional imaging dose. A simple technique of two distinct imaging modalities was investigated: initially, an anteroposterior kilovoltage (AP-kV) planar image was acquired, followed by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). To determine whether this dual imaging modality (DIM) can reduce repeat CBCTs with an AP-kV screening image compared to CBCT alone, <em>i.e.</em> a single imaging modality (SIM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients were enrolled sequentially before and after the new departmental protocol for IGRT. Initially, all patients had a CBCT prior to treatment (SIM group) as usual. For the DIM group, AP-kV imaging was added to the first three fractions, and subsequent AP-kV imaging (on demand) for patients unable to maintain adequate bladder and bowel compliance. Sixty intact prostate or post-prostatectomy patients were included: 30 before the change in protocol (SIM group) and 30 after (DIM group). Bladder volume, rectal filling, and positioning errors were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the SIM group, 30 patients underwent a total of 1116 CBCTs. In the DIM group, 30 patients had 156 AP-kV images and 1077 CBCTs. In the SIM group, 166 were repeat CBCTs with a median of 4 repeat CBCTs per patient. In DIM group, 132 were repeat CBCTs with a median of 3 repeat CBCTs per patient. We found a significant difference in incidence of repeat CBCTs due to suboptimal bladder filling (p = 0.028) and rectal gas (p = 0.045), indicating the number of repeat CBCTs was significantly lower in patients imaged with DIM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The DIM technique was found to be superior to the SIM technique, as it allowed the desired bladder volume, rectal condition, and patient positioning to be achieved prior to CBCT, reducing the need for repeat CBCTs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632425000083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer reduces treatment-related toxicity. However, positional and anatomical variations can result in patient re-setup, increased treatment time, and additional imaging dose. A simple technique of two distinct imaging modalities was investigated: initially, an anteroposterior kilovoltage (AP-kV) planar image was acquired, followed by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). To determine whether this dual imaging modality (DIM) can reduce repeat CBCTs with an AP-kV screening image compared to CBCT alone, i.e. a single imaging modality (SIM).
Methods
Patients were enrolled sequentially before and after the new departmental protocol for IGRT. Initially, all patients had a CBCT prior to treatment (SIM group) as usual. For the DIM group, AP-kV imaging was added to the first three fractions, and subsequent AP-kV imaging (on demand) for patients unable to maintain adequate bladder and bowel compliance. Sixty intact prostate or post-prostatectomy patients were included: 30 before the change in protocol (SIM group) and 30 after (DIM group). Bladder volume, rectal filling, and positioning errors were evaluated.
Results
In the SIM group, 30 patients underwent a total of 1116 CBCTs. In the DIM group, 30 patients had 156 AP-kV images and 1077 CBCTs. In the SIM group, 166 were repeat CBCTs with a median of 4 repeat CBCTs per patient. In DIM group, 132 were repeat CBCTs with a median of 3 repeat CBCTs per patient. We found a significant difference in incidence of repeat CBCTs due to suboptimal bladder filling (p = 0.028) and rectal gas (p = 0.045), indicating the number of repeat CBCTs was significantly lower in patients imaged with DIM.
Conclusion
The DIM technique was found to be superior to the SIM technique, as it allowed the desired bladder volume, rectal condition, and patient positioning to be achieved prior to CBCT, reducing the need for repeat CBCTs.