Guidelines for the use of lung ultrasound to optimise the management of neonatal respiratory distress: international expert consensus.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1186/s12916-025-03879-5
Jing Liu, Riccardo Inchingolo, Pradeep Suryawanshi, Bin-Bin Guo, Dalibor Kurepa, Rafael González Cortés, Wei Yan, Jing-Han Chi, Cecilia M Acosta, Mateusz Jagła, Deepak Sharma, Erich Sorantin, Kai-Sheng Hsieh, Giulia Graziani, Bruna Malta, Patricia Woods, Qiong Meng, Chu-Ming You, Piotr Kruczek, Martin Kneyber, Natalia Buda, Andrea Smargiassi, Jovan Lovrenski, Xiao-Ling Ren, Ya-Li Guo, Ru-Xin Qiu, Abdul Razak, Francesco Feletti
{"title":"Guidelines for the use of lung ultrasound to optimise the management of neonatal respiratory distress: international expert consensus.","authors":"Jing Liu, Riccardo Inchingolo, Pradeep Suryawanshi, Bin-Bin Guo, Dalibor Kurepa, Rafael González Cortés, Wei Yan, Jing-Han Chi, Cecilia M Acosta, Mateusz Jagła, Deepak Sharma, Erich Sorantin, Kai-Sheng Hsieh, Giulia Graziani, Bruna Malta, Patricia Woods, Qiong Meng, Chu-Ming You, Piotr Kruczek, Martin Kneyber, Natalia Buda, Andrea Smargiassi, Jovan Lovrenski, Xiao-Ling Ren, Ya-Li Guo, Ru-Xin Qiu, Abdul Razak, Francesco Feletti","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-03879-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory distress is the main reason for the admission of infants to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Rapid identification of the causes of respiratory distress and selection of appropriate and effective treatment strategies are important to optimise favourable short- and long-term patient outcomes. Lung ultrasound (LUS) technology has become increasingly important in this field. According to the scientific literature, LUS has high sensitivity (92-99%) and specificity (95-97%) in diagnosing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. This diagnostic power helps guide timely interventions, such as surfactant therapy and mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our objective was to outline consensus guidelines among an international panel of experts on the use of LUS to support the decision-making process in managing respiratory distress in the NICU. We used a three-round Delphi process. In each Delphi round, 28 panellists rated their level of agreement with each statement using a four-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In round 1, the panellists reviewed 30 initially proposed statements. In rounds 2 and 3, the statements were redeveloped based on the reviewers' comments, leading to the final approval of 18 statements. Among the 18 consensus statements, grade A was assigned a value of 10, grade B was assigned a value of 7, and grade C was assigned a value of 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A panel of experts agreed on 18 statements regarding managing infants with respiratory distress. Using LUS may help design future interventional studies and improve the benchmarking of respiratory care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"114"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03879-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Respiratory distress is the main reason for the admission of infants to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Rapid identification of the causes of respiratory distress and selection of appropriate and effective treatment strategies are important to optimise favourable short- and long-term patient outcomes. Lung ultrasound (LUS) technology has become increasingly important in this field. According to the scientific literature, LUS has high sensitivity (92-99%) and specificity (95-97%) in diagnosing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. This diagnostic power helps guide timely interventions, such as surfactant therapy and mechanical ventilation.

Methods: Our objective was to outline consensus guidelines among an international panel of experts on the use of LUS to support the decision-making process in managing respiratory distress in the NICU. We used a three-round Delphi process. In each Delphi round, 28 panellists rated their level of agreement with each statement using a four-point Likert scale.

Results: In round 1, the panellists reviewed 30 initially proposed statements. In rounds 2 and 3, the statements were redeveloped based on the reviewers' comments, leading to the final approval of 18 statements. Among the 18 consensus statements, grade A was assigned a value of 10, grade B was assigned a value of 7, and grade C was assigned a value of 1.

Conclusions: A panel of experts agreed on 18 statements regarding managing infants with respiratory distress. Using LUS may help design future interventional studies and improve the benchmarking of respiratory care outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺超声优化新生儿呼吸窘迫管理指南:国际专家共识。
背景:呼吸窘迫是新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)收治婴儿的主要原因。快速识别呼吸窘迫的原因和选择适当有效的治疗策略对于优化有利的短期和长期患者结果非常重要。肺超声(LUS)技术在这一领域已变得越来越重要。据科学文献报道,LUS诊断新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征具有较高的敏感性(92-99%)和特异性(95-97%)。这种诊断能力有助于指导及时的干预措施,如表面活性剂治疗和机械通气。方法:我们的目标是在国际专家小组中概述共识指南,以使用LUS来支持管理新生儿重症监护室呼吸窘迫的决策过程。我们使用了三轮德尔菲程序。在每个德尔福回合中,28名小组成员使用4分李克特量表评估他们对每个陈述的同意程度。结果:在第一轮中,小组成员审查了30个最初提出的陈述。在第2轮和第3轮中,根据审稿人的意见重新制定了报表,最终批准了18个报表。在18个共识陈述中,A级被赋予10分,B级被赋予7分,C级被赋予1分。结论:一个专家小组同意了18项关于处理呼吸窘迫婴儿的声明。使用LUS可能有助于设计未来的介入研究并改善呼吸护理结果的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Is liquid biopsy a cost-effective method to diagnose Burkitt Lymphoma in children and young adults? A health economic evaluation in Tanzania. The Trial Bank initiative to promote trustworthy living evidence for medication safety (PROMISE) of children: design and pilot validation. The influence of immunohistochemistry-based subtypes on overall survival in breast cancer spine metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Correction: Brain state dynamics and working memory in patients with schizophrenia and unaffected siblings. ADHD and adherence to antihypertensive medication treatment: a multinational cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1