Deep learning algorithms for detecting fractured instruments in root canals.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05652-9
Ekin Deniz Çatmabacak, İrem Çetinkaya
{"title":"Deep learning algorithms for detecting fractured instruments in root canals.","authors":"Ekin Deniz Çatmabacak, İrem Çetinkaya","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05652-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying fractured endodontic instruments (FEIs) in periapical radiographs (PAs) is a critical yet challenging aspect of root canal treatment (RCT) due to anatomical complexities and overlapping structures. Deep learning (DL) models offer potential solutions, yet their comparative performance in this domain remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset of 700 annotated PAs, including 381 teeth with FEIs, was divided into training, validation, and test sets (60/20/20 split). Five DL models-DenseNet201, EfficientNet B0, ResNet-18, VGG-19, and MaxVit-T-were trained using transfer learning and data augmentation techniques. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, AUC and MCC. Statistical analysis included the Friedman test with post-hoc corrections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DenseNet201 achieved the highest AUC (0.900) and MCC (0.810), outperforming other models in FEI detection. ResNet-18 demonstrated robust results, while EfficientNet B0 and VGG-19 provided moderate performance. MaxVit-T underperformed, with metrics near random guessing. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among models (p < 0.05), but pairwise comparisons were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DenseNet201's superior performance highlights its clinical potential for FEI detection, while ResNet-18 offers a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. The findings highlight the need for model-task alignment and optimization in medical imaging applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"293"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05652-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying fractured endodontic instruments (FEIs) in periapical radiographs (PAs) is a critical yet challenging aspect of root canal treatment (RCT) due to anatomical complexities and overlapping structures. Deep learning (DL) models offer potential solutions, yet their comparative performance in this domain remains underexplored.

Methods: A dataset of 700 annotated PAs, including 381 teeth with FEIs, was divided into training, validation, and test sets (60/20/20 split). Five DL models-DenseNet201, EfficientNet B0, ResNet-18, VGG-19, and MaxVit-T-were trained using transfer learning and data augmentation techniques. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, AUC and MCC. Statistical analysis included the Friedman test with post-hoc corrections.

Results: DenseNet201 achieved the highest AUC (0.900) and MCC (0.810), outperforming other models in FEI detection. ResNet-18 demonstrated robust results, while EfficientNet B0 and VGG-19 provided moderate performance. MaxVit-T underperformed, with metrics near random guessing. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among models (p < 0.05), but pairwise comparisons were not significant.

Conclusions: DenseNet201's superior performance highlights its clinical potential for FEI detection, while ResNet-18 offers a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. The findings highlight the need for model-task alignment and optimization in medical imaging applications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于检测根管内器械断裂的深度学习算法。
背景:由于根管治疗(RCT)的解剖复杂性和重叠结构,在根尖周x线片(PAs)上识别断裂的根管器械(FEIs)是一个关键但具有挑战性的方面。深度学习(DL)模型提供了潜在的解决方案,但它们在该领域的比较性能仍未得到充分探索。方法:将700个带注释的pa数据集(包括381个带fei的牙齿)分为训练集、验证集和测试集(60/20/20分割)。使用迁移学习和数据增强技术对densenet201、EfficientNet B0、ResNet-18、VGG-19和maxvitt这5个深度学习模型进行了训练。使用精度、AUC和MCC来评估性能。统计分析包括弗里德曼检验和事后修正。结果:DenseNet201的AUC最高(0.900),MCC最高(0.810),优于其他模型。ResNet-18表现出强劲的效果,而EfficientNet B0和VGG-19表现平平。maxvitt表现不佳,指标近乎随机猜测。结论:DenseNet201的优越性能突出了其在FEI检测中的临床潜力,而ResNet-18在准确性和计算效率之间取得了平衡。研究结果强调了在医学成像应用中对模型-任务对齐和优化的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Clinical, radiographic and histomorphometric assessment of the effects of melatonin gel mixed with a xenograft in augmentation of the maxillary sinus: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Performance of large language models in endodontics: accuracy, consistency, and benchmarking with consensus guidelines. Nano zero-valent iron-mediated sodium alginate/polyacrylic acid composite hydrogel: evaluation of hemostatic effects on post-extraction bleeding in anticoagulated mice. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of recent 3D printed high-performance polymer and CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic endocrown restorations and designs. Associations of comprehensive oral health with body composition, physical performance, and sarcopenia among middle-aged and older adults in rural western China: potential mediating pathways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1