Deep learning algorithms for detecting fractured instruments in root canals.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05652-9
Ekin Deniz Çatmabacak, İrem Çetinkaya
{"title":"Deep learning algorithms for detecting fractured instruments in root canals.","authors":"Ekin Deniz Çatmabacak, İrem Çetinkaya","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05652-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying fractured endodontic instruments (FEIs) in periapical radiographs (PAs) is a critical yet challenging aspect of root canal treatment (RCT) due to anatomical complexities and overlapping structures. Deep learning (DL) models offer potential solutions, yet their comparative performance in this domain remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset of 700 annotated PAs, including 381 teeth with FEIs, was divided into training, validation, and test sets (60/20/20 split). Five DL models-DenseNet201, EfficientNet B0, ResNet-18, VGG-19, and MaxVit-T-were trained using transfer learning and data augmentation techniques. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, AUC and MCC. Statistical analysis included the Friedman test with post-hoc corrections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DenseNet201 achieved the highest AUC (0.900) and MCC (0.810), outperforming other models in FEI detection. ResNet-18 demonstrated robust results, while EfficientNet B0 and VGG-19 provided moderate performance. MaxVit-T underperformed, with metrics near random guessing. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among models (p < 0.05), but pairwise comparisons were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DenseNet201's superior performance highlights its clinical potential for FEI detection, while ResNet-18 offers a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. The findings highlight the need for model-task alignment and optimization in medical imaging applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05652-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying fractured endodontic instruments (FEIs) in periapical radiographs (PAs) is a critical yet challenging aspect of root canal treatment (RCT) due to anatomical complexities and overlapping structures. Deep learning (DL) models offer potential solutions, yet their comparative performance in this domain remains underexplored.

Methods: A dataset of 700 annotated PAs, including 381 teeth with FEIs, was divided into training, validation, and test sets (60/20/20 split). Five DL models-DenseNet201, EfficientNet B0, ResNet-18, VGG-19, and MaxVit-T-were trained using transfer learning and data augmentation techniques. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, AUC and MCC. Statistical analysis included the Friedman test with post-hoc corrections.

Results: DenseNet201 achieved the highest AUC (0.900) and MCC (0.810), outperforming other models in FEI detection. ResNet-18 demonstrated robust results, while EfficientNet B0 and VGG-19 provided moderate performance. MaxVit-T underperformed, with metrics near random guessing. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among models (p < 0.05), but pairwise comparisons were not significant.

Conclusions: DenseNet201's superior performance highlights its clinical potential for FEI detection, while ResNet-18 offers a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. The findings highlight the need for model-task alignment and optimization in medical imaging applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Antibacterial effect of femtosecond laser against Enterococcus faecalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum biofilms on dentin: an in vitro study. Reconstructing defects following radical parotidectomy using superficial circumflex Iliac perforator flaps. The relationship between adequate keratinized mucosa and peri-implant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effects of canine movement on maxillary anterior en-masse retraction with clear aligners: a finite element study. Thermal behavior and cyclic fatigue resistance of three contemporary NiTi heat-treated single-file systems: metallurgical study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1