Clinical Value of CT-Based 3D Computational Modeling in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: An In-Depth Analysis of the PRECISE LAAO Study

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31464
Emmanuel De Cock, Stijn Lochy, Maximo Rivero-Ayerza, Mathieu Lempereur, Kristoff Cornelis, Philippe Debonnaire, Paul Vermeersch, Emma Christiaen, Ian Buysschaert
{"title":"Clinical Value of CT-Based 3D Computational Modeling in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: An In-Depth Analysis of the PRECISE LAAO Study","authors":"Emmanuel De Cock,&nbsp;Stijn Lochy,&nbsp;Maximo Rivero-Ayerza,&nbsp;Mathieu Lempereur,&nbsp;Kristoff Cornelis,&nbsp;Philippe Debonnaire,&nbsp;Paul Vermeersch,&nbsp;Emma Christiaen,&nbsp;Ian Buysschaert","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Standard of care (SoC) assessment based on computed tomography (CT) and/or transesophageal echocardiography is suboptimal for adequate preprocedural evaluation for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). This can be improved through CT-based 3D computational modeling of the LAA-device interaction using FEops HEARTguide. This study aims to assess the decisional impact of FEops in preprocedural planning for LAAO.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The PRECISE LAAO is a prospective multi-center self-controlled study evaluating the use of FEops in LAAO with Amulet. Preprocedural device size selection and degree of certainty (scale 0−10) were registered before (Decision SoC) and after accessing FEops (Decision FEops), followed by device implantation. Concordance was compared between the Decisions and the final implanted device. After the procedure, clinicians rated the subjective value of FEops on a scale from −3 (futile) to +3 (most helpful).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred two patients were included. Decision SoC was concordant with the implanted device in 61 patients (59.8%), whereas Decision FEops was concordant in 92 (90.2%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). FEops induced a size change in 35 patients, which was correct in 33 (32.4%). Certainty SoC was 6.7 ± 1.3 and increased after FEops assessment to 7.6 ± 1.3 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). In the 33 patients with FEops-induced positive corrections, Certainty SoC was lower (6.2 ± 1.5, suggesting a more complex procedure) and increased to 7.2 ± 1.2 with FEops (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Clinicians rated FEops as helpful (subjective score ≥ 1) in 90.2% of cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CT-based computational modeling using FEops has a positive decisional impact in LAAO, inducing a change in Amulet size selection in almost one out of three patients and increasing procedural confidence.</p>\n \n <p><b>Trials Trial Registration:</b> NCT04640051.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"105 6","pages":"1356-1364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Standard of care (SoC) assessment based on computed tomography (CT) and/or transesophageal echocardiography is suboptimal for adequate preprocedural evaluation for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). This can be improved through CT-based 3D computational modeling of the LAA-device interaction using FEops HEARTguide. This study aims to assess the decisional impact of FEops in preprocedural planning for LAAO.

Methods

The PRECISE LAAO is a prospective multi-center self-controlled study evaluating the use of FEops in LAAO with Amulet. Preprocedural device size selection and degree of certainty (scale 0−10) were registered before (Decision SoC) and after accessing FEops (Decision FEops), followed by device implantation. Concordance was compared between the Decisions and the final implanted device. After the procedure, clinicians rated the subjective value of FEops on a scale from −3 (futile) to +3 (most helpful).

Results

One hundred two patients were included. Decision SoC was concordant with the implanted device in 61 patients (59.8%), whereas Decision FEops was concordant in 92 (90.2%, p < 0.0001). FEops induced a size change in 35 patients, which was correct in 33 (32.4%). Certainty SoC was 6.7 ± 1.3 and increased after FEops assessment to 7.6 ± 1.3 (p < 0.0001). In the 33 patients with FEops-induced positive corrections, Certainty SoC was lower (6.2 ± 1.5, suggesting a more complex procedure) and increased to 7.2 ± 1.2 with FEops (p = 0.004). Clinicians rated FEops as helpful (subjective score ≥ 1) in 90.2% of cases.

Conclusions

CT-based computational modeling using FEops has a positive decisional impact in LAAO, inducing a change in Amulet size selection in almost one out of three patients and increasing procedural confidence.

Trials Trial Registration: NCT04640051.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于ct的左心耳闭塞三维计算建模的临床价值:精确LAAO研究的深入分析。
背景:基于计算机断层扫描(CT)和/或经食管超声心动图的标准护理(SoC)评估对于左心耳闭塞(LAAO)的充分术前评估是次优的。这可以通过使用FEops HEARTguide对LAA-device交互进行基于ct的3D计算建模来改进。本研究旨在评估FEops在LAAO程序前规划中的决策影响。方法:采用前瞻性多中心自我对照研究,评价FEops与护身符在LAAO中的应用。在进入FEops之前(Decision SoC)和之后(Decision FEops)登记手术前设备尺寸选择和确定性程度(评分0-10),然后进行设备植入。比较决策与最终植入器械的一致性。手术后,临床医生对FEops的主观评分从-3(无效)到+3(最有帮助)进行评分。结果:纳入102例患者。61例患者(59.8%)的决策SoC与植入装置一致,而92例患者(90.2%)的决策FEops与植入装置一致。结论:使用FEops的基于ct的计算建模对LAAO有积极的决策影响,导致近三分之一的患者改变了护身符大小的选择,并增加了手术信心。试验注册:NCT04640051。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement With a Novel Valve: Medium-Term Results From a Single Center Study Impact of Individual Culprit Coronary Arteries Revascularized by Primary PCI on Clinical Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1