Time-burden insults of neuromonitoring signals: practical implications for the management of acute brain injury.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Current Opinion in Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001247
Brenda Pörteners, Fabian Güiza, Geert Meyfroidt
{"title":"Time-burden insults of neuromonitoring signals: practical implications for the management of acute brain injury.","authors":"Brenda Pörteners, Fabian Güiza, Geert Meyfroidt","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To explore recent insights into measures of time-burden insults in intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, and potential implications for clinical management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The ICP is an important therapeutic target in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and some other brain injuries. Current clinical guidelines in TBI recommend starting treatment above a fixed ICP threshold of 22 mmHg. The concept of ICP burden was introduced recently, which takes both intensity and duration of an episode of elevated ICP into account. This burden of ICP is visualized in a colour-coded plot. In different cohorts of brain injured patients, prolonged ICP elevations, even at values below 20 or 22 mmHg, are associated with worse outcomes, and higher ICPs can only be tolerated briefly. The ICP burden plots are influenced by age, cerebral perfusion pressure, and cerebrovascular autoregulation, illustrating the complexity and dynamic aspect of secondary insults of elevated ICP events, and the need for personalization. Two clinical trials are currently investigating the impact of presenting this information at the bedside to clinicians.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The implementation of information on ICP burden at the patient's bedside could assist clinicians in recognizing secondary brain injury and result in more personalized ICP management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"131-136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: To explore recent insights into measures of time-burden insults in intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, and potential implications for clinical management.

Recent findings: The ICP is an important therapeutic target in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and some other brain injuries. Current clinical guidelines in TBI recommend starting treatment above a fixed ICP threshold of 22 mmHg. The concept of ICP burden was introduced recently, which takes both intensity and duration of an episode of elevated ICP into account. This burden of ICP is visualized in a colour-coded plot. In different cohorts of brain injured patients, prolonged ICP elevations, even at values below 20 or 22 mmHg, are associated with worse outcomes, and higher ICPs can only be tolerated briefly. The ICP burden plots are influenced by age, cerebral perfusion pressure, and cerebrovascular autoregulation, illustrating the complexity and dynamic aspect of secondary insults of elevated ICP events, and the need for personalization. Two clinical trials are currently investigating the impact of presenting this information at the bedside to clinicians.

Summary: The implementation of information on ICP burden at the patient's bedside could assist clinicians in recognizing secondary brain injury and result in more personalized ICP management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
期刊最新文献
Timing of neuroprognostication in the ICU. Natural history of recovery and long-term outcome in critically ill patients with brain injury. Timely delivery of care in neurological emergencies: can standardized management protocols help? Gut microbiota and its impact on critical illness. Advancements in nutritional support for critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1