Meta-analysis of nifedipine and enalapril combination therapy for hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Journal of Medical Biochemistry Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.5937/jomb0-52387
Wang Kun, Ma Wenchao, Sun Leina, Su Fangcheng
{"title":"Meta-analysis of nifedipine and enalapril combination therapy for hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Wang Kun, Ma Wenchao, Sun Leina, Su Fangcheng","doi":"10.5937/jomb0-52387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated that the therapeutic efficacy of combining nifedipine and enalapril in treating hypertension with coronary heart disease surpasses that of nifedipine as a stand-alone treatment. However, the current evidence is not yet sufficient due to limitations in the sample size, and further validation is needed. To analyze and assess the clinical impact of nifedipine combined with enalapril on hypertension complicated with coronary heart disease, and provide evidence for rational drug use in clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a revised version of the Jadad scale to assess the quality of the research literature following a rigorous screening process. The statistical analysis was performed utilizing the software RevMan 5.4.1 for data analysis. Heterogeneity in the studies was evaluated based on the results of the Q test (P value), and the OR value of the combined effect was calculated using either the model with fixed effects or the one with random effects, with the results presented in a forest plot. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by excluding articles with the highest impact, and potential bias in publication was assessed through the utilization of a funnel plot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 183 articles were initially identified, and after a comprehensive review, 14 clinical randomized controlled trials were chosen for analysis. The meta-analysis findings revealed that the trial group displayed a significantly higher overall effectiveness rate compared to the control group (OR=3.47, 95%CI 2.40-5.03). Additionally, the trial group exhibited a more pronounced reduction in blood pressure and greater enhancement in cardiac function (OR=5.55, 95%CI). Conversely, the control group had a lower occurrence of ischemic events compared to the trial group (OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.24-0.50). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability and reliability of the combined effect size results (OR=3.91, 95%CI 2.51-6.09, P<0.00001). However, based on an assessment using funnel plot results suggested potential bias in publication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined administration of nifedipine and enalapril exhibits enhanced effectiveness compared to the sole use of nifedipine in individuals diagnosed with hypertension and coronary heart disease, rendering it a valuable alternative for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":16175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Biochemistry","volume":"44 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/jomb0-52387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated that the therapeutic efficacy of combining nifedipine and enalapril in treating hypertension with coronary heart disease surpasses that of nifedipine as a stand-alone treatment. However, the current evidence is not yet sufficient due to limitations in the sample size, and further validation is needed. To analyze and assess the clinical impact of nifedipine combined with enalapril on hypertension complicated with coronary heart disease, and provide evidence for rational drug use in clinic.

Methods: We employed a revised version of the Jadad scale to assess the quality of the research literature following a rigorous screening process. The statistical analysis was performed utilizing the software RevMan 5.4.1 for data analysis. Heterogeneity in the studies was evaluated based on the results of the Q test (P value), and the OR value of the combined effect was calculated using either the model with fixed effects or the one with random effects, with the results presented in a forest plot. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by excluding articles with the highest impact, and potential bias in publication was assessed through the utilization of a funnel plot.

Results: A total of 183 articles were initially identified, and after a comprehensive review, 14 clinical randomized controlled trials were chosen for analysis. The meta-analysis findings revealed that the trial group displayed a significantly higher overall effectiveness rate compared to the control group (OR=3.47, 95%CI 2.40-5.03). Additionally, the trial group exhibited a more pronounced reduction in blood pressure and greater enhancement in cardiac function (OR=5.55, 95%CI). Conversely, the control group had a lower occurrence of ischemic events compared to the trial group (OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.24-0.50). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability and reliability of the combined effect size results (OR=3.91, 95%CI 2.51-6.09, P<0.00001). However, based on an assessment using funnel plot results suggested potential bias in publication.

Conclusions: The combined administration of nifedipine and enalapril exhibits enhanced effectiveness compared to the sole use of nifedipine in individuals diagnosed with hypertension and coronary heart disease, rendering it a valuable alternative for clinical application.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硝苯地平和依那普利联合治疗高血压合并冠心病患者的meta分析:系统回顾和meta分析。
背景:大量临床研究表明硝苯地平联合依那普利治疗高血压合并冠心病的疗效优于硝苯地平单独治疗。然而,由于样本量的限制,目前的证据尚不充分,需要进一步验证。分析评价硝苯地平联合依那普利治疗高血压合并冠心病的临床疗效,为临床合理用药提供依据。方法:我们采用修订版的Jadad量表,在严格的筛选过程后评估研究文献的质量。统计分析采用RevMan 5.4.1软件进行数据分析。根据Q检验(P值)的结果评价研究的异质性,采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型计算组合效应的OR值,结果以森林图表示。此外,通过排除影响最大的文章进行敏感性分析,并通过使用漏斗图评估发表的潜在偏倚。结果:初步纳入183篇文献,综合评价后,选择14项临床随机对照试验进行分析。meta分析结果显示,试验组的总有效率明显高于对照组(OR=3.47, 95%CI 2.40-5.03)。此外,试验组表现出更明显的血压降低和心功能增强(OR=5.55, 95%CI)。相反,与试验组相比,对照组缺血性事件发生率较低(OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.24-0.50)。敏感性分析证实了联合效应量结果的稳定性和可靠性(OR=3.91, 95%CI 2.51 ~ 6.09)。结论:硝苯地平联合依那普利在诊断为高血压和冠心病的个体中比单独使用硝苯地平更有效,是临床应用的有价值的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Biochemistry
Journal of Medical Biochemistry BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JOURNAL OF MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY (J MED BIOCHEM) is the official journal of the Society of Medical Biochemists of Serbia with international peer-review. Papers are independently reviewed by at least two reviewers selected by the Editors as Blind Peer Reviews. The Journal of Medical Biochemistry is published quarterly. The Journal publishes original scientific and specialized articles on all aspects of clinical and medical biochemistry, molecular medicine, clinical hematology and coagulation, clinical immunology and autoimmunity, clinical microbiology, virology, clinical genomics and molecular biology, genetic epidemiology, drug measurement, evaluation of diagnostic markers, new reagents and laboratory equipment, reference materials and methods, reference values, laboratory organization, automation, quality control, clinical metrology, all related scientific disciplines where chemistry, biochemistry, molecular biology and immunochemistry deal with the study of normal and pathologic processes in human beings.
期刊最新文献
Correlation risk analysis of serum inflammatory factors and 25-hydroxyvitamin D in vascular lesions in type 2 diabetes patients. Molecular mechanisms of metformin action: From metabolic effects to lifespan extension and healthspan promotion. Application value of serum high mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) and soluble triggering receptor-1 (sTREM-1) levels in the prognostic assessment of trauma. Diagnostic value of mucosal-associated invariant T+ cells combined with inflammatory factors in differentiating chronic rhinosinusitis subtypes with or without nasal polyps. Irrigation fluid temperature modulates coagulation and endothelial biomarkers in patients undergoing TURP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1