Does pregabalin offer potential as a first-line therapy for generalized anxiety disorder? A meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Frontiers in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1483770
Narcis Cardoner, Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas, Pilar Saiz, Guillermo Lahera, Miguel Ángel Álvarez-Mon, Pino Alonso Ortega, María Pérez-Páramo
{"title":"Does pregabalin offer potential as a first-line therapy for generalized anxiety disorder? A meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness.","authors":"Narcis Cardoner, Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas, Pilar Saiz, Guillermo Lahera, Miguel Ángel Álvarez-Mon, Pino Alonso Ortega, María Pérez-Páramo","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2025.1483770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) is a mental health condition with a recent increase in prevalence. GAD is often underdiagnosed, leading to negative consequences for individuals, healthcare systems, and society. The economic burden and impaired quality of life associated with GAD underscores the need for effective treatment. Pregabalin has shown promise in reducing anxiety symptoms; however, further research is needed to evaluate its efficacy and compare it with other treatment options. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and optimal pregabalin dosage for the treatment of GAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Pregabalin-treated patients comprised the intervention group, whereas the comparator group received benzodiazepines, SSRIs, SNRIs, or placebo. Efficacy and safety were evaluated using various scales and adverse events (AEs). Randomized clinical trials were included in the study. Four major databases were used for this study. Outcome measures included the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I), discontinuation rates, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software, employing odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed based on follow-up and dosage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies involving 4,822 patients were analyzed. Pregabalin demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing HAM-A global scores at 2 weeks (MD -1.23, 95% CI -1.79 to -0.66), 4 weeks (MD -1.12, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.63), 8 weeks (MD -2.50, 95% CI -4.21 to -0.79), 12 weeks (MD 0.99, 95% CI 0.35-1.63), and 6 months to 1 year (MD -3.31, 95% CI -4.30 to -2.31). Pregabalin also showed a higher response rate to HAM-A (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31 1.75). CGI-I scores favored pregabalin (MD -0.25, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.12), with a higher response rate (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15-1.55). The discontinuation rates were lower with pregabalin (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70, 0.91). Adverse events favored pregabalin over SSRIs/SNRIs and benzodiazepines at different doses. Pregabalin was associated with higher cost-effectiveness (MD 0.02, 95% CI 0.01, 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregabalin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for generalized anxiety disorder, showing superior efficacy and safety compared with first-line medications.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024556152.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1483770"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1483770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) is a mental health condition with a recent increase in prevalence. GAD is often underdiagnosed, leading to negative consequences for individuals, healthcare systems, and society. The economic burden and impaired quality of life associated with GAD underscores the need for effective treatment. Pregabalin has shown promise in reducing anxiety symptoms; however, further research is needed to evaluate its efficacy and compare it with other treatment options. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and optimal pregabalin dosage for the treatment of GAD.

Methods: This meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Pregabalin-treated patients comprised the intervention group, whereas the comparator group received benzodiazepines, SSRIs, SNRIs, or placebo. Efficacy and safety were evaluated using various scales and adverse events (AEs). Randomized clinical trials were included in the study. Four major databases were used for this study. Outcome measures included the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I), discontinuation rates, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software, employing odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed based on follow-up and dosage.

Results: Fourteen studies involving 4,822 patients were analyzed. Pregabalin demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing HAM-A global scores at 2 weeks (MD -1.23, 95% CI -1.79 to -0.66), 4 weeks (MD -1.12, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.63), 8 weeks (MD -2.50, 95% CI -4.21 to -0.79), 12 weeks (MD 0.99, 95% CI 0.35-1.63), and 6 months to 1 year (MD -3.31, 95% CI -4.30 to -2.31). Pregabalin also showed a higher response rate to HAM-A (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31 1.75). CGI-I scores favored pregabalin (MD -0.25, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.12), with a higher response rate (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15-1.55). The discontinuation rates were lower with pregabalin (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70, 0.91). Adverse events favored pregabalin over SSRIs/SNRIs and benzodiazepines at different doses. Pregabalin was associated with higher cost-effectiveness (MD 0.02, 95% CI 0.01, 0.03).

Conclusion: Pregabalin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for generalized anxiety disorder, showing superior efficacy and safety compared with first-line medications.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024556152.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普瑞巴林有可能作为广泛性焦虑障碍的一线治疗药物吗?疗效、安全性和成本效益的荟萃分析。
简介:广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)是一种近年来患病率上升的精神健康状况。广泛性焦虑症经常被误诊,导致对个人、医疗系统和社会的负面影响。与广泛性焦虑症相关的经济负担和生活质量受损强调了有效治疗的必要性。普瑞巴林已显示出减轻焦虑症状的希望;然而,需要进一步的研究来评估其疗效并将其与其他治疗方案进行比较。本研究旨在评估普瑞巴林治疗广泛性焦虑症的有效性、安全性和最佳剂量。方法:本荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南。普瑞巴林治疗的患者组成干预组,而比较组接受苯二氮卓类药物、SSRIs、SNRIs或安慰剂。使用各种量表和不良事件(ae)评估疗效和安全性。随机临床试验纳入研究。本研究使用了四个主要数据库。结果测量包括汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAM-A)、临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-I)、停药率、成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。采用Review Manager 5.4软件进行meta分析,采用比值比(ORs)和均值差异(MDs), 95%置信区间(ci)。根据随访和给药情况进行亚组分析和敏感性分析。结果:14项研究涉及4822例患者进行了分析。普瑞巴林在2周(MD -1.23, 95% CI -1.79至-0.66)、4周(MD -1.12, 95% CI -1.60至-0.63)、8周(MD -2.50, 95% CI -4.21至-0.79)、12周(MD 0.99, 95% CI 0.35-1.63)和6个月至1年(MD -3.31, 95% CI -4.30至-2.31)降低HAM-A总体评分方面表现出卓越的疗效。普瑞巴林对HAM-A的有效率也更高(OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31 1.75)。CGI-I评分倾向于普瑞巴林(MD -0.25, 95% CI -0.38至-0.12),具有更高的反应率(OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15-1.55)。普瑞巴林的停药率较低(OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70, 0.91)。不良事件在不同剂量下普瑞巴林优于SSRIs/SNRIs和苯二氮卓类药物。普瑞巴林与较高的成本-效果相关(MD为0.02,95% CI为0.01,0.03)。结论:普瑞巴林是一种治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的有效且耐受性良好的药物,与一线药物相比,具有优越的疗效和安全性。系统评价注册号:PROSPERO CRD42024556152。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
7α-acetoxy-6β-hydroxyroyleanone (Roy) modulates IL-6/STAT3/JAK2 mRNA expression and suppresses tumor growth in glioblastoma cell models. A real-world study of adverse event profiles associated with the four key components of antibody-drug conjugates based on the FAERS database. Effect of the antifungal drug ciclopirox on the inhibition of HMGA2-mediated oncogenic capacity in ACHN renal cell carcinoma. Malnutrition, cachexia and sarcopenia as susceptibility factors for cardiovascular complications in patients with cancer. Ferroptosis and cuproptosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: interconnected mechanisms and therapeutic implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1