Changes in primary healthcare workforce burnout during and after the termination of COVID-19 emergency response: A one-and-half-year observational study.
Xueji Wu, Huihong Ruan, Xiaoying Feng, Chaojun Xie, Ronald R O'Donnell, Zhoubin Zhang
{"title":"Changes in primary healthcare workforce burnout during and after the termination of COVID-19 emergency response: A one-and-half-year observational study.","authors":"Xueji Wu, Huihong Ruan, Xiaoying Feng, Chaojun Xie, Ronald R O'Donnell, Zhoubin Zhang","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_891_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary healthcare workforce (PHCW) should be suffered from less burnout after the termination of the COVID-19 response. The current study compared the changes in the three dimensions of burnout in PHCW during and after the response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two convenience-sampling, online, cross-sectional questionnaire studies were conducted in local PHCW. Studies were administered in April 2022 and 8 months after the termination. Burnout was measured by the Chinese version of 15-item Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey, which assesses three dimensions: emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and reduced personal accomplishment (reduced PA). The primary outcome was the prevalence of its three dimensions. Data on demographics, work environment, health conditions, and outlets for stress reduction were collected. We compared burnout and associated factors between the study periods by using Student's <i>t</i>-test, Chi test, or Mann‒Whitney test. The association between factors and burnout was identified by a logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 162 and 200 participants completed the questionnaires during and after the response. No significant differences in demographics, including age, gender, education attainment, work experience, or seniority level were observed. The prevalence of burnout-free status was similar (9.9% vs 12.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.434) between the two periods. Severe burnout decreased from 45.7% to 0%, and moderate burnout nearly doubled after the response. The prevalence of EE decreased the most, by 55.0%, followed by that of DP, which decreased by 38.4% (all <i>P</i> < 0.001); however, there was no difference in the prevalence of reduced PA (77.2% vs 74.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.557). Logistic regression showed that promotion and alcohol consumption decreased the risk of EE. Considering leaving the job increases the risk of DP, a lower self-evaluated health score and more distress were associated with EE and DP. Exercise decreased the risk of reduced PA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inconsistent with the hypothesis, we found that severe burnout decreased, but moderate burnout increased in PHCWs after the response. EE and DP decreased more, but reduced PA had no change. Incentives, improved self-evaluated health conditions, alcohol consumption, and exercise ameliorate burnout. Healthcare policy makers must consider multiple effective ways to mitigate burnout in the post-epidemic era.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"14 1","pages":"126-131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_891_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Primary healthcare workforce (PHCW) should be suffered from less burnout after the termination of the COVID-19 response. The current study compared the changes in the three dimensions of burnout in PHCW during and after the response.
Methods: Two convenience-sampling, online, cross-sectional questionnaire studies were conducted in local PHCW. Studies were administered in April 2022 and 8 months after the termination. Burnout was measured by the Chinese version of 15-item Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey, which assesses three dimensions: emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and reduced personal accomplishment (reduced PA). The primary outcome was the prevalence of its three dimensions. Data on demographics, work environment, health conditions, and outlets for stress reduction were collected. We compared burnout and associated factors between the study periods by using Student's t-test, Chi test, or Mann‒Whitney test. The association between factors and burnout was identified by a logistic regression model.
Results: In total, 162 and 200 participants completed the questionnaires during and after the response. No significant differences in demographics, including age, gender, education attainment, work experience, or seniority level were observed. The prevalence of burnout-free status was similar (9.9% vs 12.5%, P = 0.434) between the two periods. Severe burnout decreased from 45.7% to 0%, and moderate burnout nearly doubled after the response. The prevalence of EE decreased the most, by 55.0%, followed by that of DP, which decreased by 38.4% (all P < 0.001); however, there was no difference in the prevalence of reduced PA (77.2% vs 74.5%, P = 0.557). Logistic regression showed that promotion and alcohol consumption decreased the risk of EE. Considering leaving the job increases the risk of DP, a lower self-evaluated health score and more distress were associated with EE and DP. Exercise decreased the risk of reduced PA.
Conclusions: Inconsistent with the hypothesis, we found that severe burnout decreased, but moderate burnout increased in PHCWs after the response. EE and DP decreased more, but reduced PA had no change. Incentives, improved self-evaluated health conditions, alcohol consumption, and exercise ameliorate burnout. Healthcare policy makers must consider multiple effective ways to mitigate burnout in the post-epidemic era.
背景:在COVID-19应对工作结束后,初级卫生保健工作人员(PHCW)应减少职业倦怠。本研究比较了PHCW在反应期间和反应后倦怠三个维度的变化。方法:采用两种方便抽样、在线、横断面问卷调查方法对当地初级保健医院进行调查。研究分别于2022年4月和终止后8个月进行。本研究采用中国版《马斯拉奇职业倦怠量表》,从情绪耗竭(EE)、人格解体(DP)和个人成就感降低(reduced PA)三个维度进行测评。主要结果是其三个维度的流行程度。收集了有关人口统计、工作环境、卫生条件和减压途径的数据。我们采用学生t检验、Chi检验或Mann-Whitney检验比较各研究阶段的倦怠及其相关因素。采用logistic回归模型分析各因素与职业倦怠的关系。结果:参与问卷调查的有162人,参与问卷调查的有200人。年龄、性别、受教育程度、工作经验或资历水平等人口统计数据无显著差异。两期无倦怠状态的患病率相似(9.9% vs 12.5%, P = 0.434)。重度倦怠从45.7%下降到0%,中度倦怠几乎翻了一番。EE患病率下降幅度最大,为55.0%;DP患病率次之,为38.4%(均P < 0.001);然而,PA降低的患病率没有差异(77.2% vs 74.5%, P = 0.557)。Logistic回归显示,促销和饮酒降低了情感表达的风险。考虑到离职会增加DP的风险,较低的自我评估健康得分和更多的痛苦与情感表达和DP相关。运动可以降低PA降低的风险。结论:与假设不一致的是,我们发现在反应后,PHCWs的重度倦怠减少,而中度倦怠增加。EE和DP降低较多,PA降低无变化。激励、改善自我评估的健康状况、饮酒和锻炼可以改善倦怠。医疗保健政策制定者必须考虑多种有效的方法来减轻后流行病时代的职业倦怠。