Systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence and risk factors for gingival recession

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105645
Felix Marschner , Clemens Lechte , Philipp Kanzow , Valentina Hraský , Wolfgang Pfister
{"title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence and risk factors for gingival recession","authors":"Felix Marschner ,&nbsp;Clemens Lechte ,&nbsp;Philipp Kanzow ,&nbsp;Valentina Hraský ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Pfister","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Gingival recession is a common mucogingival condition. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence of gingival recession and identify associated risk factors in the general population.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection</h3><div>Observational studies reporting prevalence and risk factors for gingival recession published since 2000 were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cross-sectional studies. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted for the prevalence (%) of gingival recession at different cut-off scores (≥1 mm, ≥3 mm, and ≥5 mm) and odds ratios (OR) of identified risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Sources</h3><div>MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched in November 2024. Additionally, a hand search was performed. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024516816).</div></div><div><h3>Data</h3><div>21 sources, reporting on 22 studies were included in this systematic review. Most of the included studies represented a low risk of bias. Overall, estimated prevalence of gingival recession was 81.1 % (95 %-CI: 73.9–86.7) for ≥1 mm, 48.4 % (95 %-CI: 39.7–57.2) for ≥3 mm, and 16.2 % (95 %-CI: 9.1–27.4) for ≥5 mm. Risk factors were structured into domains. Meta-analyses revealed male gender (p<sub>adj.</sub>&lt;0.001; OR=1.52, 95 %-CI: 1.36–1.69), smoking (p<sub>adj.</sub>=0.003; OR=1.84, 95 %-CI: 1.33–2.53), alcohol consumption (p<sub>adj.</sub>&lt;0.001; OR=2.04, 95 %-CI: 1.51–2.75), dental plaque (p<sub>adj.</sub>&lt;0.001; OR=4.26, 95 %-CI: 2.91–6.24), presence of a high frenulum (p<sub>adj.</sub>&lt;0.001; OR=4.58, 95 %-CI: 2.58–8.11), occlusal trauma (p<sub>adj.</sub>=0.003; OR=3.20, 95 %-CI: 1.74–5.87), periodontitis (p<sub>adj.</sub>&lt;0.001; OR=9.90, 95 %-CI: 4.15–23.60), and history of periodontal treatment (p<sub>adj.</sub>&lt;0.001; OR=1.86, 95 %-CI: 1.33–2.58) to be significantly associated with gingival recession.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Observational studies indicated that gingival recession is a highly prevalent condition associated with a variety of risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>Gingival recession is associated with periodontal conditions like periodontitis, high frenulum, and modifiable factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and occlusal trauma. Clinicians should primarily focus on identifying these risk factors and implementing preventive strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 105645"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225000909","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Gingival recession is a common mucogingival condition. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence of gingival recession and identify associated risk factors in the general population.

Study selection

Observational studies reporting prevalence and risk factors for gingival recession published since 2000 were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cross-sectional studies. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted for the prevalence (%) of gingival recession at different cut-off scores (≥1 mm, ≥3 mm, and ≥5 mm) and odds ratios (OR) of identified risk factors.

Sources

MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched in November 2024. Additionally, a hand search was performed. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024516816).

Data

21 sources, reporting on 22 studies were included in this systematic review. Most of the included studies represented a low risk of bias. Overall, estimated prevalence of gingival recession was 81.1 % (95 %-CI: 73.9–86.7) for ≥1 mm, 48.4 % (95 %-CI: 39.7–57.2) for ≥3 mm, and 16.2 % (95 %-CI: 9.1–27.4) for ≥5 mm. Risk factors were structured into domains. Meta-analyses revealed male gender (padj.<0.001; OR=1.52, 95 %-CI: 1.36–1.69), smoking (padj.=0.003; OR=1.84, 95 %-CI: 1.33–2.53), alcohol consumption (padj.<0.001; OR=2.04, 95 %-CI: 1.51–2.75), dental plaque (padj.<0.001; OR=4.26, 95 %-CI: 2.91–6.24), presence of a high frenulum (padj.<0.001; OR=4.58, 95 %-CI: 2.58–8.11), occlusal trauma (padj.=0.003; OR=3.20, 95 %-CI: 1.74–5.87), periodontitis (padj.<0.001; OR=9.90, 95 %-CI: 4.15–23.60), and history of periodontal treatment (padj.<0.001; OR=1.86, 95 %-CI: 1.33–2.58) to be significantly associated with gingival recession.

Conclusions

Observational studies indicated that gingival recession is a highly prevalent condition associated with a variety of risk factors.

Clinical significance

Gingival recession is associated with periodontal conditions like periodontitis, high frenulum, and modifiable factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and occlusal trauma. Clinicians should primarily focus on identifying these risk factors and implementing preventive strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙龈萎缩患病率及危险因素的系统回顾与荟萃分析。
目的:牙龈退缩是一种常见的牙龈粘膜疾病。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估普通人群中牙龈萎缩的患病率,并确定相关的危险因素。研究选择:纳入2000年以来发表的报告牙龈萎缩患病率和危险因素的观察性研究。采用改进的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对横断面研究进行方法学质量评估。对不同分值(≥1mm、≥3mm和≥5mm)下牙龈萎缩的发生率(%)以及确定的危险因素的优势比(OR)进行随机效应荟萃分析。来源:MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus和Web of Science在2024年11月进行了系统搜索。此外,还进行了手搜索。该研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024516816)。数据:本系统综述纳入了21个来源,22项研究的报告。大多数纳入的研究偏倚风险较低。总体而言,≥1mm牙龈萎缩的估计患病率为81.1% (95%-CI: 73.9-86.7),≥3mm为48.4% (95%-CI: 39.7-57.2),≥5mm为16.2% (95%-CI: 9.1-27.4)。风险因素被划分为不同的领域。meta分析显示性别为男性(padj.adj.=0.003;OR=1.84, 95%-CI: 1.33-2.53),饮酒(padj. adjj . adjj . adjj .=0.003;OR=3.20, 95%-CI: 1.74-5.87);结论:观察性研究表明,牙龈萎缩是一种与多种危险因素相关的高度普遍的疾病。临床意义:牙龈萎缩与牙周炎、高系带等牙周疾病以及吸烟、饮酒和咬合创伤等可改变因素有关。临床医生应主要关注识别这些风险因素和实施预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Erratum to "Multidimensional oral frailty scale developed through an international e-Delphi approach" [Journal of Dentistry 165 (2026)/106276]. Comparison of the accuracy and effectiveness of two robotic surgical techniques for zygomatic implant placement: an in vitro study. Assessment of patient satisfaction and esthetic outcomes following treatment of post-orthodontic white spot lesions using a bioactive adhesive and resin infiltrant: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial: Resin infiltration vs bioactive adhesive in initial caries: randomized clinical trial. Fluoride varnish for preventing dental caries among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness studies. Comparative Impact of Manual and Electric Toothbrushing on Acid-Eroded Enamel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1