Evaluation of Axial Length and Refractive Outcomes in Patients With Dense Vitreous Hemorrhage Who Have Phacovitrectomy.

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1177/24741264251322211
Yucel Ozturk, Abdullah Ağın, Aysun Yucel Gencoglu
{"title":"Evaluation of Axial Length and Refractive Outcomes in Patients With Dense Vitreous Hemorrhage Who Have Phacovitrectomy.","authors":"Yucel Ozturk, Abdullah Ağın, Aysun Yucel Gencoglu","doi":"10.1177/24741264251322211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the axial length (AL) measurement and refractive results in patients with dense vitreous hemorrhage who had phacovitrectomy and investigate the effectiveness of ultrasound biometry in this population. <b>Methods:</b> This study included patients with cataracts and a dense vitreous hemorrhage who had phacovitrectomy (Group 1) and a control group of patients with cataracts who had phacoemulsification only (Group 2). The AL was measured preoperatively using A-scan contact ultrasound in Group 1 and partial coherence interferometry (PCI)-based biometry (IOLMaster 500) in Group 2. Postoperatively, the AL was measured using A-scan contact ultrasound and PCI-based biometry in Group 1. The refractive error was measured preoperatively and postoperatively in both groups with an autorefractometer (KR-1). The primary outcome measures were the preoperative and postoperative AL and refractive outcomes. <b>Results:</b> In Group 1, the median AL was as follows: preoperative, 23.33 mm with ultrasound (I); postoperative, 23.18 mm with PCI biometry (II); postoperative, 23.44 mm with ultrasound (III) (I-II, <i>P =</i> .04; I-III, <i>P =</i> .01; II-III, <i>P <</i> .01). The AL measured preoperatively with ultrasound and postoperatively with PCI biometry had a statistically significant strong positive correlation with a high-reliability coefficient compared with the AL measured preoperatively and postoperatively with ultrasound. The median prediction error and absolute prediction error were similar in both groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Ultrasound biometry is effective for intraocular lens calculation and AL measurement in eyes with a dense vitreous hemorrhage. This imaging modality may result in near-optimum refractive outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"323-329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251322211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the axial length (AL) measurement and refractive results in patients with dense vitreous hemorrhage who had phacovitrectomy and investigate the effectiveness of ultrasound biometry in this population. Methods: This study included patients with cataracts and a dense vitreous hemorrhage who had phacovitrectomy (Group 1) and a control group of patients with cataracts who had phacoemulsification only (Group 2). The AL was measured preoperatively using A-scan contact ultrasound in Group 1 and partial coherence interferometry (PCI)-based biometry (IOLMaster 500) in Group 2. Postoperatively, the AL was measured using A-scan contact ultrasound and PCI-based biometry in Group 1. The refractive error was measured preoperatively and postoperatively in both groups with an autorefractometer (KR-1). The primary outcome measures were the preoperative and postoperative AL and refractive outcomes. Results: In Group 1, the median AL was as follows: preoperative, 23.33 mm with ultrasound (I); postoperative, 23.18 mm with PCI biometry (II); postoperative, 23.44 mm with ultrasound (III) (I-II, P = .04; I-III, P = .01; II-III, P < .01). The AL measured preoperatively with ultrasound and postoperatively with PCI biometry had a statistically significant strong positive correlation with a high-reliability coefficient compared with the AL measured preoperatively and postoperatively with ultrasound. The median prediction error and absolute prediction error were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Ultrasound biometry is effective for intraocular lens calculation and AL measurement in eyes with a dense vitreous hemorrhage. This imaging modality may result in near-optimum refractive outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
密集玻璃体出血患者行白内障玻璃体切除术后眼轴长度和屈光效果的评价。
目的:评价玻璃体切除术后致密性玻璃体出血患者的眼轴长(AL)测量和屈光结果,探讨超声生物测量在该人群中的有效性。方法:本研究纳入白内障合并玻璃体致密出血患者并行晶状体切除术(1组)和仅行超声乳化白内障患者(2组)。术前使用a扫描接触超声测量AL(1组),使用部分相干干涉测量(PCI)生物测量(IOLMaster 500)测量AL(2组)。术后,第1组采用a扫描接触超声和pci生物测定法测量AL。两组患者术前和术后均采用自折射计(KR-1, Topcon)测量屈光不全。主要观察指标是术前和术后AL和屈光结果。结果:第一组中位AL:术前,超声23.33 mm (I);术后23.18 mm PCI生物测量(II);术后23.44 mm超声(III) (I-II, P = 0.04;I-iii, p = 0.01;Ii-iii, p .01)。术前超声与术后PCI生物计量测得AL与术前、术后超声测得AL具有统计学意义的强正相关,且具有高信度系数。两组的中位预测误差和绝对预测误差相似。结论:超声生物测量法可用于玻璃体密集出血眼的人工晶状体计算和AL测量。这种成像方式可能导致接近最佳的折射结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biomarkers of Diabetic Macular Edema on Optical Coherence Tomography After Cataract Surgery. Morphologic Changes of Macular Choroidal Neovascularization on OCT Angiography Following Faricimab Therapy in Patients With AMD. Progressive Intramembranous Cystic Changes in Macular Hole-Associated Epiretinal Proliferation Over 3 Years. No Optic Pit Retinoschisis (NOPIR): A Risk Factor for Glaucoma. An Altmetric and Bibliometric Comparative Analysis from 2014 to 2023 of the 100 Most-Mentioned and 100 Most-Cited Articles About Diabetic Retinopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1