Update on the Assessment of GFR in Patients with Cancer.

IF 3 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000736
Verônica T Costa E Silva, Fei Xiong, Lea Mantz, Meghan E Sise, Sandra M Herrmann, Abhijat Kitchlu
{"title":"Update on the Assessment of GFR in Patients with Cancer.","authors":"Verônica T Costa E Silva, Fei Xiong, Lea Mantz, Meghan E Sise, Sandra M Herrmann, Abhijat Kitchlu","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate assessment of GFR is key in patients with cancer to guide drug eligibility, adjust dosing of systemic therapy, and minimize the risks of undertreatment and systemic toxicity. Several aspects of GFR evaluation in patients with cancer have been unclear, such as the choice of the GFR estimating equation and the overall lack of data on the reliability of new filtration markers, such as cystatin C. This uncertainty has led to concerns that inaccurate GFR estimation may have a large effect on clinical practice and research. Recent data have brought important developments to the field. The new and timely Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of CKD raised important considerations and provided guidance on key aspects of GFR evaluation in patients with cancer. The guidelines cover valid estimating equations, incorporation of cystatin C in GFR estimation, drawbacks of using race in GFR estimation, and acknowledge that non-GFR determinants of filtration markers may be prominent in patients with cancer, reducing the accuracy of GFR estimating equations, prompting greater utilization of GFR measurement. The aim of this review is to summarize advances in GFR evaluation in patients with cancer considering the new Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines and other recent data.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":"861-870"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate assessment of GFR is key in patients with cancer to guide drug eligibility, adjust dosing of systemic therapy, and minimize the risks of undertreatment and systemic toxicity. Several aspects of GFR evaluation in patients with cancer have been unclear, such as the choice of the GFR estimating equation and the overall lack of data on the reliability of new filtration markers, such as cystatin C. This uncertainty has led to concerns that inaccurate GFR estimation may have a large effect on clinical practice and research. Recent data have brought important developments to the field. The new and timely Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of CKD raised important considerations and provided guidance on key aspects of GFR evaluation in patients with cancer. The guidelines cover valid estimating equations, incorporation of cystatin C in GFR estimation, drawbacks of using race in GFR estimation, and acknowledge that non-GFR determinants of filtration markers may be prominent in patients with cancer, reducing the accuracy of GFR estimating equations, prompting greater utilization of GFR measurement. The aim of this review is to summarize advances in GFR evaluation in patients with cancer considering the new Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines and other recent data.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者肾小球滤过率评估的最新进展。
摘要:准确评估肾小球滤过率(glomerular filtration rate, GFR)是指导癌症患者用药资格、调整全身治疗剂量、降低治疗不足和全身毒性风险的关键。癌症患者GFR评估的几个方面尚不清楚,例如GFR估计方程的选择以及关于新过滤标志物(如胱抑素c)可靠性的总体缺乏数据。这种不确定性导致人们担心不准确的GFR估计可能对临床实践和研究产生重大影响。最近的数据为该领域带来了重要的发展。新的及时的KDIGO 2024慢性肾脏疾病评估和管理临床实践指南提出了重要的考虑因素,并为癌症患者GFR评估的关键方面提供了指导。该指南涵盖了有效的估计方程,在GFR估计中结合胱抑素C,使用种族的缺点,并承认过滤标志物的非GFR决定因素可能在某些患者中突出,降低了GFR估计方程的准确性,促进了GFR测量的更多利用。考虑到新的KDIGO指南和其他最新数据,本综述的目的是总结癌症患者GFR评估的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neurofilament Light Chain and Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Cross-Sectional Exploratory Study. We Can Do Better: Pre-Formed Dialysis Access for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander People: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis Form the ANZDATA Registry 2004-2020. A Switch in Iron Delivery Is Critical for Postnatal Kidney Development. Intravascular Ultrasound is More Accurate Than Angiography in Arteriovenous Vascular Access Lesions. Comparative Analysis of Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement Techniques: Part 2. Current GFR Measurements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1