Explaining Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Advance Care Planning: A Decomposition Analysis

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of pain and symptom management Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.014
Yifan Lou PhD, LMSW , Emma Zang PhD , Qianqian Li MPH
{"title":"Explaining Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Advance Care Planning: A Decomposition Analysis","authors":"Yifan Lou PhD, LMSW ,&nbsp;Emma Zang PhD ,&nbsp;Qianqian Li MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The study quantifies the relative significance of a range of demographic, socioeconomic status (SES), health care service and access, health, and psychological factors in explaining racial and ethnic disparities in advance care planning (ACP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our sample included 8416 White, Black, or Hispanic adults aged 65 or older, using the 2020 Health and Retirement Study. We applied Gelbach's decomposition method to understand the relative contribution of 37 factors in explaining White-Black and White-Hispanic disparities in ACP discussion and advance directives (AD) completion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ACP disparities between White and Hispanic populations were nearly twice as large as the disparity between White and Black populations. Decomposition analyses reveal that the 37 factors collectively explained approximately 65% of the White-Hispanic ACP gaps and 37.5% and 57.1% of the Black-White gaps in ACP discussions and AD completion, respectively. Notably, demographic, SES, and health care service and access factors played substantial roles in these disparities, while health factors did not emerge as significant contributors. Education was the most important contributor across all four tested gaps. Perceptions on how often wishes were respected in healthcare uniquely accounted for 10% of the explained White-Black disparities in ACP discussions. Immigration status and living arrangements were significant contributors to explained White-Hispanic disparities but not to White-Black differences.</div></div><div><h3>Discussions</h3><div>Interventions targeting less educated older Black and Hispanic individuals should be prioritized to narrow the ACP disparity. Negative healthcare experiences in previous care and household dynamics should be addressed while working with Black and Hispanic older adults, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"69 5","pages":"Pages 527-535.e10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392425000739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The study quantifies the relative significance of a range of demographic, socioeconomic status (SES), health care service and access, health, and psychological factors in explaining racial and ethnic disparities in advance care planning (ACP).

Methods

Our sample included 8416 White, Black, or Hispanic adults aged 65 or older, using the 2020 Health and Retirement Study. We applied Gelbach's decomposition method to understand the relative contribution of 37 factors in explaining White-Black and White-Hispanic disparities in ACP discussion and advance directives (AD) completion.

Results

The ACP disparities between White and Hispanic populations were nearly twice as large as the disparity between White and Black populations. Decomposition analyses reveal that the 37 factors collectively explained approximately 65% of the White-Hispanic ACP gaps and 37.5% and 57.1% of the Black-White gaps in ACP discussions and AD completion, respectively. Notably, demographic, SES, and health care service and access factors played substantial roles in these disparities, while health factors did not emerge as significant contributors. Education was the most important contributor across all four tested gaps. Perceptions on how often wishes were respected in healthcare uniquely accounted for 10% of the explained White-Black disparities in ACP discussions. Immigration status and living arrangements were significant contributors to explained White-Hispanic disparities but not to White-Black differences.

Discussions

Interventions targeting less educated older Black and Hispanic individuals should be prioritized to narrow the ACP disparity. Negative healthcare experiences in previous care and household dynamics should be addressed while working with Black and Hispanic older adults, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解释预先护理规划中的种族和民族差异:分解分析》。
背景:本研究量化了一系列人口统计学、社会经济地位(SES)、卫生保健服务和可及性、健康和心理因素在解释预先护理计划(ACP)中的种族和民族差异中的相对重要性。方法:我们的样本包括8416名65岁或以上的白人、黑人或西班牙裔成年人,使用2020年健康与退休研究。我们应用Gelbach的分解方法来了解37个因素在解释白人-黑人和白人-西班牙裔在ACP讨论和预先指示(AD)完成方面的差异中的相对贡献。结果:白人和西班牙裔之间的ACP差异几乎是白人和黑人之间差异的两倍。分解分析显示,这37个因素共同解释了大约65%的白人-西班牙裔ACP差距,以及在ACP讨论和AD完成方面的黑人-白人差距分别为37.5%和57.1%。值得注意的是,人口、社会经济地位、卫生保健服务和获取因素在这些差异中发挥了重要作用,而健康因素并未成为重要因素。在所有四个测试差距中,教育是最重要的因素。在ACP讨论中,对医疗保健中愿望得到尊重的频率的看法占解释的白人和黑人差异的10%。移民身份和生活安排是解释白人-西班牙裔差异的重要因素,但不是白人-黑人差异的原因。讨论:应优先考虑针对受教育程度较低的老年黑人和西班牙裔个体的干预措施,以缩小ACP的差距。在与黑人和西班牙裔老年人一起工作时,应分别解决先前护理和家庭动态中的负面医疗保健经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
期刊最新文献
PC-FACS November 3, 2025. Evaluation of the Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP) in a cancer center-based palliative care clinic. Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement for cancer pain relief: Pilot randomized controlled trial. Difficult Encounters: How to Set Boundaries in the Context of Structural Inequities. PC-FACS October 3, 2025.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1