Clinical validation of fully automated cartilage transverse relaxation time (T2) and thickness analysis using quantitative DESS magnetic resonance imaging.
Wolfgang Wirth, Simon Herger, Susanne Maschek, Anna Wisser, Oliver Bieri, Felix Eckstein, Annegret Mündermann
{"title":"Clinical validation of fully automated cartilage transverse relaxation time (T2) and thickness analysis using quantitative DESS magnetic resonance imaging.","authors":"Wolfgang Wirth, Simon Herger, Susanne Maschek, Anna Wisser, Oliver Bieri, Felix Eckstein, Annegret Mündermann","doi":"10.1007/s10334-025-01227-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To clinically validate a fully automated cartilage segmentation technique from quantitative double-echo steady-state (qDESS) MRI supporting simultaneous estimation of cartilage T2 and morphology. Here, we test whether laminar (superficial and deep layer) T2 results from convolutional neural network (CNN) segmentations are consistent with those from manual expert segmentations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The 3D qDESS sequence was acquired using 3 T MRI (resolution: 0.3125 × 0.3125x1.5 mm) in both knees of 37 subjects with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and 48 uninjured controls. Automated femorotibial cartilage (FTJ) segmentation was based on a 2D U-Net. Laminar T2 and cartilage thickness across the FTJ) were compared between ACL-injured and contralateral knees, and between ACL-injured and control knees. Effect sizes of these differences were measured using non-parametric Cohen's d (d<sub>n-p</sub>).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Significant differences were observed only in deep T2, with longer T2 in ACL-injured knees than in contralateral and healthy control knees in most of the comparisons and with similar effect sizes for automated and manual segmentations (range d<sub>n-p</sub> automated/manual: 0.58-1.04/0.58-0.74). No significant differences were observed in superficial T2 or cartilage thickness.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Fully-automated, CNN-based analysis showed similar sensitivity to differences in laminar cartilage T2 as manual segmentation, allowing automated qDESS-analyses to be applied to larger datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-025-01227-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To clinically validate a fully automated cartilage segmentation technique from quantitative double-echo steady-state (qDESS) MRI supporting simultaneous estimation of cartilage T2 and morphology. Here, we test whether laminar (superficial and deep layer) T2 results from convolutional neural network (CNN) segmentations are consistent with those from manual expert segmentations.
Materials and methods: The 3D qDESS sequence was acquired using 3 T MRI (resolution: 0.3125 × 0.3125x1.5 mm) in both knees of 37 subjects with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and 48 uninjured controls. Automated femorotibial cartilage (FTJ) segmentation was based on a 2D U-Net. Laminar T2 and cartilage thickness across the FTJ) were compared between ACL-injured and contralateral knees, and between ACL-injured and control knees. Effect sizes of these differences were measured using non-parametric Cohen's d (dn-p).
Result: Significant differences were observed only in deep T2, with longer T2 in ACL-injured knees than in contralateral and healthy control knees in most of the comparisons and with similar effect sizes for automated and manual segmentations (range dn-p automated/manual: 0.58-1.04/0.58-0.74). No significant differences were observed in superficial T2 or cartilage thickness.
Discussion: Fully-automated, CNN-based analysis showed similar sensitivity to differences in laminar cartilage T2 as manual segmentation, allowing automated qDESS-analyses to be applied to larger datasets.
期刊介绍:
MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include:
advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology,
new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine,
study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance,
reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.