Are all tuberculosis deaths correctly attributed due to tuberculosis? Analysis of causes of death (COD) using verbal autopsy: A cross-sectional study in Puducherry.

IF 1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1108_24
Reenaa Mohan, M Rajalakshmi, G Kalaiselvan
{"title":"Are all tuberculosis deaths correctly attributed due to tuberculosis? Analysis of causes of death (COD) using verbal autopsy: A cross-sectional study in Puducherry.","authors":"Reenaa Mohan, M Rajalakshmi, G Kalaiselvan","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1108_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>State Task Force National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (STF-NTEP) wanted to ascertain the cause of death of tuberculosis (TB) patients was due to TB. Hence, this study was done to determine the cause of death among TB patients using verbal autopsy.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>The community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among the closest caregivers of the reported TB death cases using a verbal autopsy questionnaire. A list of TB deaths was extracted from Puducherry's State Tuberculosis Office (STO). The VA questionnaires were reviewed by two trained faculties and experts independently who were also asked to code the cause of death according to the International Classification of Diseases - 10<sup>th</sup> Revision. Data were analysed using the SPSS software receiver operator curve (ROC) curve and Cohen's kappa statistics with 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied to compare agreement between the raters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 307 TB deaths, 143 were contacted and the remaining were migrated, missing or not available. Among them 34.9% of the declared TB deaths are not due to TB. Cohen's kappa = 0.4; 95% CI: (0.858-0.985) showed moderate agreement between the raters. Experts' review was used as a reference standard to compare rater agreements. The Predictive accuracy of Rater 2 (area under the curve [AUC] -0.953; <i>P</i> value <0.001) was slightly higher than Rater 1 (AUC -0.942; <i>P</i> value <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of the study have clearly indicated that 34.9% of the declared TB deaths are not due to TB.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"14 1","pages":"290-295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1108_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: State Task Force National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (STF-NTEP) wanted to ascertain the cause of death of tuberculosis (TB) patients was due to TB. Hence, this study was done to determine the cause of death among TB patients using verbal autopsy.

Material and method: The community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among the closest caregivers of the reported TB death cases using a verbal autopsy questionnaire. A list of TB deaths was extracted from Puducherry's State Tuberculosis Office (STO). The VA questionnaires were reviewed by two trained faculties and experts independently who were also asked to code the cause of death according to the International Classification of Diseases - 10th Revision. Data were analysed using the SPSS software receiver operator curve (ROC) curve and Cohen's kappa statistics with 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied to compare agreement between the raters.

Results: Out of 307 TB deaths, 143 were contacted and the remaining were migrated, missing or not available. Among them 34.9% of the declared TB deaths are not due to TB. Cohen's kappa = 0.4; 95% CI: (0.858-0.985) showed moderate agreement between the raters. Experts' review was used as a reference standard to compare rater agreements. The Predictive accuracy of Rater 2 (area under the curve [AUC] -0.953; P value <0.001) was slightly higher than Rater 1 (AUC -0.942; P value <0.001).

Conclusion: The findings of the study have clearly indicated that 34.9% of the declared TB deaths are not due to TB.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是否所有肺结核死亡病例都正确归因于肺结核?利用口头尸检分析死亡原因(COD):普度克里的一项横断面研究。
背景:国家消除结核病规划(STF-NTEP)国家工作组希望确定结核病(TB)患者的死亡原因是否由结核病引起。因此,本研究采用死因推断法确定结核病患者的死因。材料和方法:以社区为基础的横断面研究在报告的结核病死亡病例的最亲密的护理人员中进行,使用口头尸检问卷。从普杜切里州结核病办公室(STO)提取了一份结核病死亡名单。退伍军人事务部的调查表由两名训练有素的教员和专家独立审查,他们还被要求根据《国际疾病分类-第十次修订版》对死因进行编码。数据分析采用SPSS软件receiver operator curve (ROC)曲线,采用95%置信区间(CI)的Cohen’s kappa统计比较评分者之间的一致性。结果:在307例结核病死亡中,有143例接触过,其余为迁移、失踪或无法获得。其中34.9%公布的结核病死亡病例并非由结核病所致。Cohen’s kappa = 0.4;95% CI:(0.858-0.985)显示评分者之间有中度一致。专家的审查被用作比较评级协议的参考标准。Rater 2的预测准确度(曲线下面积[AUC] -0.953;结论:本研究结果清楚地表明,34.9%的结核病死亡病例不是由结核病引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Demographic and conceptual disparities in systemic lupus erythematosus: A comparative analysis from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Understanding fathers' help-seeking: A scoping review. Understanding menstrual health perceptions, practices, and premenstrual symptomatology among college girls in urban Chandigarh: A cross-sectional study. Dialyzer-associated thrombocytopenia: Case report and brief review of the literature. Wrist circumference (WrC) in early gestation: A novel anthropometric predictor of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Asian Indian women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1