Tear Pattern of the Complete Discoid Lateral Meniscus According to Meniscal Morphology.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241306842
Ho Yeon Kim, Jong-Min Kim, Bum-Sik Lee, Jaejung Ryu
{"title":"Tear Pattern of the Complete Discoid Lateral Meniscus According to Meniscal Morphology.","authors":"Ho Yeon Kim, Jong-Min Kim, Bum-Sik Lee, Jaejung Ryu","doi":"10.1177/23259671241306842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pattern and distribution of tears for the complete discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) are not well documented.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the prevalence and pattern of tear types for the complete DLM using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic data.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed consecutive series of 1219 patients (1406 knees) who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery for any pathology and were diagnosed with DLM between January 1998 and December 2022. After excluding cases with incomplete DLM (774 knees) and previous history of ipsilateral knee surgery (55 knees), a total of 486 patients (577 knees; mean age, 37.4 years; range, 5-76 years) with complete DLM were evaluated. Preoperative MRI and intraoperative arthroscopic findings were analyzed to classify tears into the following: peripheral tear-including bucket-handle tear; horizontal tear; radial tear; flap tear; and no tear. In addition, preoperative MRI was used to categorize 2 distinct morphological variants of complete DLM: (1) a block-shaped type with a thick blunt free edge; and (2) a wedge-shaped type with a tapering sharp free edge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When categorized by meniscal morphology, 435 knees (75.4%) were classified as block-type and 142 knees (24.6%) as wedge-type complete DLM. Peripheral tears (66.7%) were the most prevalent in the block type, followed by horizontal tears (22.5%) and radial tears (0.7%). In the wedge type, horizontal tears (43%) were observed most frequently, followed by radial tears (18.3%), peripheral tears (11.3%), and flap tears (5.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A block-shaped morphology was the predominant form of complete DLM in this cohort of operatively treated patients. The wedge-type morphology had a distinctly different tear pattern, with horizontal tears being the most common. While the block type exhibited either a peripheral or horizontal tear, the wedge type was characterized by a greater variation in tear pattern.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"23259671241306842"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241306842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pattern and distribution of tears for the complete discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) are not well documented.

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence and pattern of tear types for the complete DLM using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic data.

Study design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: We reviewed consecutive series of 1219 patients (1406 knees) who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery for any pathology and were diagnosed with DLM between January 1998 and December 2022. After excluding cases with incomplete DLM (774 knees) and previous history of ipsilateral knee surgery (55 knees), a total of 486 patients (577 knees; mean age, 37.4 years; range, 5-76 years) with complete DLM were evaluated. Preoperative MRI and intraoperative arthroscopic findings were analyzed to classify tears into the following: peripheral tear-including bucket-handle tear; horizontal tear; radial tear; flap tear; and no tear. In addition, preoperative MRI was used to categorize 2 distinct morphological variants of complete DLM: (1) a block-shaped type with a thick blunt free edge; and (2) a wedge-shaped type with a tapering sharp free edge.

Results: When categorized by meniscal morphology, 435 knees (75.4%) were classified as block-type and 142 knees (24.6%) as wedge-type complete DLM. Peripheral tears (66.7%) were the most prevalent in the block type, followed by horizontal tears (22.5%) and radial tears (0.7%). In the wedge type, horizontal tears (43%) were observed most frequently, followed by radial tears (18.3%), peripheral tears (11.3%), and flap tears (5.6%).

Conclusion: A block-shaped morphology was the predominant form of complete DLM in this cohort of operatively treated patients. The wedge-type morphology had a distinctly different tear pattern, with horizontal tears being the most common. While the block type exhibited either a peripheral or horizontal tear, the wedge type was characterized by a greater variation in tear pattern.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于半月板形态学的完整盘状外侧半月板撕裂模式。
背景:完整盘状外侧半月板(DLM)撕裂的模式和分布尚未得到很好的记录。目的:利用磁共振成像(MRI)和关节镜资料探讨完全性DLM撕裂类型的患病率和模式。研究设计:横断面研究;证据水平,3。方法:我们回顾了1998年1月至2022年12月期间,1219例(1406个膝关节)因任何病理原因接受膝关节镜手术并被诊断为DLM的患者。排除不完全性DLM(774个膝关节)和既往同侧膝关节手术史(55个膝关节)后,共有486例患者(577个膝关节;平均年龄37.4岁;范围(5-76岁),评估完全DLM。分析术前MRI和术中关节镜检查结果,将撕裂分为以下几种:外周撕裂(包括桶柄撕裂);水平的泪;径向泪;皮瓣泪;没有眼泪。此外,术前MRI对完全性DLM的2种不同形态变异进行了分类:(1)块状型,自由边缘粗钝;(2)具有逐渐变细的锋利自由边的楔形型。结果:按半月板形态分类,块状膝435例(75.4%),楔形膝142例(24.6%)。块型中以外周撕裂(66.7%)最为常见,其次为水平撕裂(22.5%)和径向撕裂(0.7%)。在楔型中,水平撕裂(43%)最为常见,其次是径向撕裂(18.3%)、周围撕裂(11.3%)和皮瓣撕裂(5.6%)。结论:在这组手术治疗的患者中,块状形态是完全DLM的主要形式。楔形形态有明显不同的撕裂模式,以水平撕裂最为常见。而块型表现为周围或水平撕裂,楔形型的特点是更大的变化撕裂模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Braided and Nonbraided Hamstring Tendon Grafts in ACL Reconstruction: Impact on Graft Thickness, Rerupture Rates, and Clinical Outcomes. Arthroscopic Microfracture for Focal Glenoid Osteochondral Lesions in Young Active-Duty Military Patients: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intra-articular Injection Treatments for Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Pitch Performance After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Major League Baseball Pitchers. Rate of Mechanical Symptom Resolution at 2-Year Follow-up After Hip Arthroscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1