Metabolic Phenotype of Stage 1 and Stage 2 Type 1 Diabetes Using Modeling of β Cell Function.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-10-16 DOI:10.1210/clinem/dgaf086
Alfonso Galderisi, Jacopo Bonet, Heba M Ismail, Antoinette Moran, Paolo Fiorina, Emanuele Bosi, Alessandra Petrelli
{"title":"Metabolic Phenotype of Stage 1 and Stage 2 Type 1 Diabetes Using Modeling of β Cell Function.","authors":"Alfonso Galderisi, Jacopo Bonet, Heba M Ismail, Antoinette Moran, Paolo Fiorina, Emanuele Bosi, Alessandra Petrelli","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Staging preclinical type 1 diabetes (T1D) and monitoring the response to disease-modifying treatments rely on the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). However, it is unknown whether OGTT-derived measures of beta cell function can detect subtle changes in metabolic phenotype, thus limiting their usability as endpoints in prevention trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the metabolic phenotype of people with Stage 1 and Stage 2 T1D using metabolic modelling of β cell function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We characterized the metabolic phenotype of individuals with islet autoimmunity in the absence (Stage 1) or presence (Stage 2) of dysglycemia. Participants were screened at a TrialNet site and underwent a 5-point, 2-hour OGTT. Standard measures of insulin secretion (area under the curve, C-peptide, Homeostatic Model Assessment [HOMA] 2-B) and sensitivity (HOMA Insulin Resistance, HOMA2-S, Matsuda Index) and oral minimal model-derived insulin secretion (φ total), sensitivity (sensitivity index), and clearance were adopted to characterize the cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty participants with Stage 1 and 27 with Stage 2T1D were selected. Standard metrics of insulin secretion and sensitivity did not differ between Stage 1 and Stage 2 T1D, while the oral minimal model revealed lower insulin secretion (P < .001) and sensitivity (P = .034) in those with Stage 2 T1D, as well as increased insulin clearance (P = .006). A higher baseline φ total was associated with reduced odds of disease progression, independent of stage (OR 0.92 [0.86, 0.98], P = .016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The oral minimal model describes the differential metabolic phenotype of Stage 1 and Stage 2 T1D and identifies the φ total as a progression predictor. This supports its use as a sensitive tool and endpoint for T1D prevention trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"3168-3178"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Staging preclinical type 1 diabetes (T1D) and monitoring the response to disease-modifying treatments rely on the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). However, it is unknown whether OGTT-derived measures of beta cell function can detect subtle changes in metabolic phenotype, thus limiting their usability as endpoints in prevention trials.

Objective: To describe the metabolic phenotype of people with Stage 1 and Stage 2 T1D using metabolic modelling of β cell function.

Methods: We characterized the metabolic phenotype of individuals with islet autoimmunity in the absence (Stage 1) or presence (Stage 2) of dysglycemia. Participants were screened at a TrialNet site and underwent a 5-point, 2-hour OGTT. Standard measures of insulin secretion (area under the curve, C-peptide, Homeostatic Model Assessment [HOMA] 2-B) and sensitivity (HOMA Insulin Resistance, HOMA2-S, Matsuda Index) and oral minimal model-derived insulin secretion (φ total), sensitivity (sensitivity index), and clearance were adopted to characterize the cohort.

Results: Thirty participants with Stage 1 and 27 with Stage 2T1D were selected. Standard metrics of insulin secretion and sensitivity did not differ between Stage 1 and Stage 2 T1D, while the oral minimal model revealed lower insulin secretion (P < .001) and sensitivity (P = .034) in those with Stage 2 T1D, as well as increased insulin clearance (P = .006). A higher baseline φ total was associated with reduced odds of disease progression, independent of stage (OR 0.92 [0.86, 0.98], P = .016).

Conclusion: The oral minimal model describes the differential metabolic phenotype of Stage 1 and Stage 2 T1D and identifies the φ total as a progression predictor. This supports its use as a sensitive tool and endpoint for T1D prevention trials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用β细胞功能模型研究1期和2期1型糖尿病的代谢表型
背景:临床前1型糖尿病(T1D)分期和监测对疾病改善治疗的反应依赖于口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。然而,目前尚不清楚ogtt衍生的β细胞功能测量是否可以检测代谢表型的细微变化,从而限制了它们作为预防试验终点的可用性。方法:我们对没有(阶段1)或存在(阶段2)血糖异常的胰岛自身免疫个体的代谢表型进行了表征。参与者在TrialNet站点进行筛选,并接受5点,2小时的OGTT。采用胰岛素分泌(AUC - c肽,HOMA2-B)和敏感性(HOMA-IR, HOMA2-S, Matsuda指数)和口服最小模型衍生胰岛素分泌(phi total),敏感性(SI)和清除率的标准测量来表征该队列。结果:1期30例,2期27例。胰岛素分泌和敏感性的标准指标在1期和2期T1D之间没有差异,而口服最小模型显示胰岛素分泌较低(结论:口服最小模型描述了1期和2期T1D的差异代谢表型,并确定phi总为进展预测因子。这支持它作为T1D预防试验的敏感工具和终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
期刊最新文献
Transforming Women's Health Research-The Time Is Now. Elucidating the Impact of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor on Glucose Intolerance in People With Cystic Fibrosis. Wake Up and Smell-the Cortisol? Diabetes Risk in Young Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Need for Prevention and Survivor-specific Treatment Strategies. Unraveling the Complexity of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency Genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1