Comparison of energy expenditure with level of amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY Wound Repair and Regeneration Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1111/wrr.70007
Jan Karel Petric, Matthew J Johnson, Kelly Jeans, Ariel R G Fortenberry, Jijia Wang, Kirsten Tulchin-Francis, Dane K Wukich, Tiffany D F Graham
{"title":"Comparison of energy expenditure with level of amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus.","authors":"Jan Karel Petric, Matthew J Johnson, Kelly Jeans, Ariel R G Fortenberry, Jijia Wang, Kirsten Tulchin-Francis, Dane K Wukich, Tiffany D F Graham","doi":"10.1111/wrr.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations in the USA. After these amputations, patients exhibit reduced mobility and increased energy demands of walking. The best surgical practice is to preserve as much of a functional limb as possible, in part due to the fact that proximal amputations result in a greater increase in energy expenditure compared to more distal amputations. While differences in transfemoral, transtibial and partial foot amputation levels have been previously documented, no studies have directly compared transtibial and transmetatarsal amputees. The present study aimed to compare energy expenditure and patient-reported outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus who have undergone transmetatrsal (TMA) and transtibial amputations (TTA). Thirty-nine DM participants with either unilateral TMA, unilateral TTA or no amputations (control group) participated in this observational study. Energy expenditure, heart rate (HR) and distance travelled during six-minute walk test (6MWT), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) were measured at a single research visit. No significant differences between the three groups were detected in energy expenditure, HR or distance covered during 6MWT, as well as in PROMIS-29 or FAAM patient-reported outcomes. While the results of this study suggest no differences in functional and patient-reported outcomes between transmetatarsal and transtibial amputees, a larger sample size that would allow for control of comorbidities is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":"33 1","pages":"e70007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations in the USA. After these amputations, patients exhibit reduced mobility and increased energy demands of walking. The best surgical practice is to preserve as much of a functional limb as possible, in part due to the fact that proximal amputations result in a greater increase in energy expenditure compared to more distal amputations. While differences in transfemoral, transtibial and partial foot amputation levels have been previously documented, no studies have directly compared transtibial and transmetatarsal amputees. The present study aimed to compare energy expenditure and patient-reported outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus who have undergone transmetatrsal (TMA) and transtibial amputations (TTA). Thirty-nine DM participants with either unilateral TMA, unilateral TTA or no amputations (control group) participated in this observational study. Energy expenditure, heart rate (HR) and distance travelled during six-minute walk test (6MWT), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) were measured at a single research visit. No significant differences between the three groups were detected in energy expenditure, HR or distance covered during 6MWT, as well as in PROMIS-29 or FAAM patient-reported outcomes. While the results of this study suggest no differences in functional and patient-reported outcomes between transmetatarsal and transtibial amputees, a larger sample size that would allow for control of comorbidities is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Wound Repair and Regeneration 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others. Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.
期刊最新文献
Synergistic effects of incorporated additives in multifunctional dressings for chronic wound healing: An updated comprehensive review. Kaempferol promotes flap survival by inhibiting ferroptosis and inflammation through network pharmacology and in vivo experiments. Thyroxine (T3)-mediated regulation of early cardiac repair in a chemical-induced hypoxia/reoxygenation model of adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). Recent advances in bioactive wound dressings. A novel method to assess photobiomodulation in stimulating regenerative capacity and vascularization in zebrafish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1