Paramedics Satisfaction with Simulation Experience for Career Development and Skills Maintenance.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S480813
Abdullah Alshibani, Abdulhakim Saad Alburaidi, Munirah Ali Alsukait, Reema Albadr, Bader Khalid Alsubaie, Ahmed Almutairi, Shujaa Almutairi, Zainab AlHussaini
{"title":"Paramedics Satisfaction with Simulation Experience for Career Development and Skills Maintenance.","authors":"Abdullah Alshibani, Abdulhakim Saad Alburaidi, Munirah Ali Alsukait, Reema Albadr, Bader Khalid Alsubaie, Ahmed Almutairi, Shujaa Almutairi, Zainab AlHussaini","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S480813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to the importance of medical simulation as part of continuous professional development, we developed a specialized 12-month simulation program for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel working at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), aiming to develop and maintain their clinical practice skills for various trauma/medical emergencies. This study, therefore, aimed to assess the level of satisfaction and experience with the developed simulation program to guide current and future simulation programs designed for EMS personnel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed where an online survey was distributed to all EMS personnel at KAMC. Demographics, professional information, and satisfaction with simulation experience using the validated Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale (SSES) were collected from all participants. Descriptive and correlation analyses were performed to assess the effectiveness of the implemented simulation program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 71 invited EMS personnel, 63 (88.7%) completed the survey. Most participants were males (88.9%) with less than 5-year experience (54%). The results showed high mean scores for all scale items, ranging from 4.44 to 4.63 on a scale of 1 to 5, with standard deviations ranging from 0.58 to 0.86. The correlation analyses showed no significant associations between demographics and professional information with simulation experience and satisfaction level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggested that the simulation-based continuing professional development program at KAMC is effective in contributing to the professional development and skill enhancement of EMS personnel. Further, larger scale studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of simulation programs for EMS personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"245-253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S480813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the importance of medical simulation as part of continuous professional development, we developed a specialized 12-month simulation program for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel working at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), aiming to develop and maintain their clinical practice skills for various trauma/medical emergencies. This study, therefore, aimed to assess the level of satisfaction and experience with the developed simulation program to guide current and future simulation programs designed for EMS personnel.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed where an online survey was distributed to all EMS personnel at KAMC. Demographics, professional information, and satisfaction with simulation experience using the validated Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale (SSES) were collected from all participants. Descriptive and correlation analyses were performed to assess the effectiveness of the implemented simulation program.

Results: Of the 71 invited EMS personnel, 63 (88.7%) completed the survey. Most participants were males (88.9%) with less than 5-year experience (54%). The results showed high mean scores for all scale items, ranging from 4.44 to 4.63 on a scale of 1 to 5, with standard deviations ranging from 0.58 to 0.86. The correlation analyses showed no significant associations between demographics and professional information with simulation experience and satisfaction level.

Conclusion: These findings suggested that the simulation-based continuing professional development program at KAMC is effective in contributing to the professional development and skill enhancement of EMS personnel. Further, larger scale studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of simulation programs for EMS personnel.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of Simulation-Based Surgical Training in Laparoscopy on Satisfaction Level and Proficiency in Surgical Skills. Challenges and Difficulties During the Nursing Internship Program Using 5 Domains: A Cross-Sectional Study. Application of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content in Medical Examinations. Predictive Validity of Preclerkship Performance Metrics on USMLE Step 2 CK Outcomes in the Step 1 Pass/Fail Era. Career Planning in Medical Students Rotating Through Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Role of Self-Efficacy, Social Support, and Personal Participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1