Patient–Provider Race Concordance and Primary Care Suicide Risk Screening in the Veterans Health Administration

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14459
Linda Diem Tran, Todd H. Wagner, Nazanin Bahraini, Lisa A. Brenner, Kritee Gujral
{"title":"Patient–Provider Race Concordance and Primary Care Suicide Risk Screening in the Veterans Health Administration","authors":"Linda Diem Tran,&nbsp;Todd H. Wagner,&nbsp;Nazanin Bahraini,&nbsp;Lisa A. Brenner,&nbsp;Kritee Gujral","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the association between patient–provider race concordance and the likelihood of being screened for suicide risk in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Setting and Design</h3>\n \n <p>In November 2020, the VA expanded its national suicide risk identification strategy to include an annual universal suicide screening requirement. This study examined VA primary care visits from 2021 to 2022, where provider race and ethnicity could be identified. We examined the association between patient–provider race concordance and the probability of being screened for suicide risk, adjusting for patient and visit characteristics. Importantly, we also adjusted for provider fixed effects, which allowed us to estimate the effect of race concordant vs. non-concordant patient interactions for the <i>same</i> provider. We additionally conducted analyses stratified by provider race and ethnicity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources and Analytic Sample</h3>\n \n <p>Patient visit data were extracted from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. The analytic sample comprised 219,673 primary care visits and 196,968 unique patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-two percent of all patients due for a screening were screened. Black patients had the lowest unadjusted screening rate of 58%. In adjusted analyses, we found that Black patients were 1.2 percentage points less likely to be screened compared to White patients (95% CI: −0.016, −0.008). Patient–provider race concordance was associated with a 0.4 percentage points higher likelihood of suicide screening (95% CI: 0.0002, 0.008). This small effect size represents 880 suicide screens and 33% of the Black–White screening gap. In separate analyses stratified by provider race and ethnicity, White providers were less likely to screen racially minoritized patients, and Hispanic and Asian providers were less likely to screen Black patients compared to White patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patient–provider race concordance was associated with increased suicide screens. Despite the small absolute increase in screening, health systems should consider the role of race concordance in patient–provider interactions when developing strategies to aid nationwide efforts to prevent suicides.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6773.14459","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14459","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the association between patient–provider race concordance and the likelihood of being screened for suicide risk in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care settings.

Study Setting and Design

In November 2020, the VA expanded its national suicide risk identification strategy to include an annual universal suicide screening requirement. This study examined VA primary care visits from 2021 to 2022, where provider race and ethnicity could be identified. We examined the association between patient–provider race concordance and the probability of being screened for suicide risk, adjusting for patient and visit characteristics. Importantly, we also adjusted for provider fixed effects, which allowed us to estimate the effect of race concordant vs. non-concordant patient interactions for the same provider. We additionally conducted analyses stratified by provider race and ethnicity.

Data Sources and Analytic Sample

Patient visit data were extracted from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. The analytic sample comprised 219,673 primary care visits and 196,968 unique patients.

Principal Findings

Sixty-two percent of all patients due for a screening were screened. Black patients had the lowest unadjusted screening rate of 58%. In adjusted analyses, we found that Black patients were 1.2 percentage points less likely to be screened compared to White patients (95% CI: −0.016, −0.008). Patient–provider race concordance was associated with a 0.4 percentage points higher likelihood of suicide screening (95% CI: 0.0002, 0.008). This small effect size represents 880 suicide screens and 33% of the Black–White screening gap. In separate analyses stratified by provider race and ethnicity, White providers were less likely to screen racially minoritized patients, and Hispanic and Asian providers were less likely to screen Black patients compared to White patients.

Conclusions

Patient–provider race concordance was associated with increased suicide screens. Despite the small absolute increase in screening, health systems should consider the role of race concordance in patient–provider interactions when developing strategies to aid nationwide efforts to prevent suicides.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退伍军人健康管理局的患者-提供者种族一致性和初级保健自杀风险筛查。
目的:评估退伍军人健康管理局(VA)初级保健机构中患者-提供者种族一致性与自杀风险筛查可能性之间的关系。研究设置和设计:2020年11月,退伍军人事务部扩大了其国家自杀风险识别战略,将年度普遍自杀筛查要求纳入其中。本研究调查了2021年至2022年的VA初级保健就诊情况,其中可以确定提供者的种族和民族。我们检查了患者-提供者种族一致性与自杀风险筛查概率之间的关系,并根据患者和就诊特征进行了调整。重要的是,我们还调整了提供者固定效应,这使我们能够估计同一提供者的种族和谐与非和谐患者互动的影响。我们还进行了按提供者种族和民族分层的分析。数据来源和分析样本:患者就诊数据提取自VA公司数据仓库。分析样本包括219,673次初级保健就诊和196,968例独特患者。主要发现:所有应进行筛查的患者中有62%进行了筛查。黑人患者未经调整的筛查率最低,为58%。在调整分析中,我们发现黑人患者接受筛查的可能性比白人患者低1.2个百分点(95% CI: -0.016, -0.008)。患者-提供者种族一致性与自杀筛查的可能性高0.4个百分点相关(95% CI: 0.0002, 0.008)。这个小的效应量代表了880个自杀筛查和33%的黑白筛查差距。在按提供者种族和民族分层的单独分析中,白人提供者不太可能筛查少数种族患者,与白人患者相比,西班牙裔和亚洲提供者不太可能筛查黑人患者。结论:患者-提供者种族一致性与自杀筛查增加有关。尽管筛查的绝对增加很小,但在制定战略以帮助全国范围内预防自杀的努力时,卫生系统应考虑种族一致性在患者-提供者互动中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Examining the Potential Role of Opioid Settlement Funds in the Face of Impending Federal Budget Reductions for Substance Use Disorders. Mind the Activation Gap: Factors Associated With Low Patient Activation Among Dual-Eligible Versus Medicare-Only Beneficiaries. Identifying Bariatric Surgery Patients With the Most Favorable Cost Outcomes. A Machine Learning Model to Improve Risk Adjustment Accuracy in Medicare. The All-Payer Claims Database After the Gobeille Supreme Court Decision: Assessing the Impact on Fatal Opioid-Related Overdose Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1