Immediate prosthetic nasal rehabilitation following rhinectomy: indications and limitations of the epiplating system – a case series

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.01.007
Ioan Davies (Speciality Registrar in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery), R.M. Sumudu Himesha B. Medawela (Dental Core Trainee 3), Peter Llewelyn Evans (Maxillofacial Laboratory Services Manager), M.A. Kittur (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon), Ketan Shah (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon)
{"title":"Immediate prosthetic nasal rehabilitation following rhinectomy: indications and limitations of the epiplating system – a case series","authors":"Ioan Davies (Speciality Registrar in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery),&nbsp;R.M. Sumudu Himesha B. Medawela (Dental Core Trainee 3),&nbsp;Peter Llewelyn Evans (Maxillofacial Laboratory Services Manager),&nbsp;M.A. Kittur (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon),&nbsp;Ketan Shah (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon)","doi":"10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nasal reconstruction post-rhinectomy is challenging. Nasal prostheses using the Medicon epiplating system (Medicon) provides a simpler alternative with good patient outcomes. Eight patients (mean age 65 years; equal gender distribution) underwent immediate nasal rehabilitation using a unilateral nasal Epiplate implant for magnet-retained prostheses post-rhinectomy, with follow-up from five to 37 months (mean 13 months). No implants failed or required unplanned removal. The Medicon epiplating system is a low-morbidity, quick, cost-saving procedure which should be considered as a viable alternative to zygomatic implants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55318,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"63 3","pages":"Pages 252-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435625000105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nasal reconstruction post-rhinectomy is challenging. Nasal prostheses using the Medicon epiplating system (Medicon) provides a simpler alternative with good patient outcomes. Eight patients (mean age 65 years; equal gender distribution) underwent immediate nasal rehabilitation using a unilateral nasal Epiplate implant for magnet-retained prostheses post-rhinectomy, with follow-up from five to 37 months (mean 13 months). No implants failed or required unplanned removal. The Medicon epiplating system is a low-morbidity, quick, cost-saving procedure which should be considered as a viable alternative to zygomatic implants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻切除术后立即修复鼻:表电镀系统的适应症和局限性-一个病例系列。
鼻切除术后鼻部重建具有挑战性。使用Medicon epiplating系统(Medicon)的鼻假体提供了一种更简单的选择,患者的治疗效果也很好。8例患者(平均年龄65岁;在鼻切除术后立即使用单侧鼻表板植入磁铁保留假体进行鼻腔康复,随访5至37个月(平均13个月)。没有植入失败或需要意外移除。Medicon epi电镀系统是一种低发病率、快速、节省成本的手术,应该被认为是颧骨植入物的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons: • Leading articles on all aspects of surgery in the oro-facial and head and neck region • One of the largest circulations of any international journal in this field • Dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise.
期刊最新文献
Reply to the second Letter to Editor regarding: Clinical behaviour and complications of CAD-CAM subperiosteal implants supporting fixed partial restorations: a scoping review. Predictive artificial intelligence in maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review. Replyto the Letter to the Editor regarding: "Clinical behavior and complications of CAD-CAM subperiosteal implants supporting fixed partial restorations: a scoping review". Comment on "Head and neck cancer risk predictive models: a solution to streamline urgent suspected cancer referrals?''. In reply to the Letter to Editor regarding "Head and neck cancer risk predictive models: a solution to streamline urgent suspected cancer referrals?"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1