Target Achievements of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Blood Pressure, and Glucose in Patients with Diabetes after Acute Coronary Syndrome: Findings from the Chinese Cardiovascular Association Database - iHeart Project.
IF 3 3区 医学Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMSGlobal HeartPub Date : 2025-02-17eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI:10.5334/gh.1400
{"title":"Target Achievements of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Blood Pressure, and Glucose in Patients with Diabetes after Acute Coronary Syndrome: Findings from the Chinese Cardiovascular Association Database - iHeart Project.","authors":"Jing Yang, Rui Zhang, Bing Han, Hui Li, Jingfeng Wang, Yihui Xiao, Xiaofan Yu, Shaofeng Guan, Cuilian Dai, Hua Yan, Tingbo Jiang, Hanbin Cui, Shuang Yang, Zeqi Zheng, Yugang Dong, Annai Wang, Guohai Su, Yan Wang","doi":"10.5334/gh.1400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the achievement of metabolic risk factor targets and influencing factors in ACS patients with diabetes during the 12 months after discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from the Chinese Cardiovascular Association database-iHeart Project. Patients who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of ACS between 2014 and 2021 and who had at least one measurement record of LDL-C, BP, or HbA<sub>1c</sub> within 12 months after discharge were included. We further stratified patients by diabetes status and analyzed the correlation between clinical characteristics, measurement strategy, and achievement of targets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diabetes was identified in 1,027 (27.5%) of the eligible patients. The proportions of patients with diabetes achieving targets of LDL-C, BP, and HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels were 42.4%, 61.5%, and 43.7%, respectively. However, combined achievement rate was significantly lower in patients with diabetes than patients without diabetes (16.6% vs. 26.6%). Patients with diabetes who underwent the first measurement within three months or had ≥3 measurements within 12 months were positively associated with achieving combined targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The achievement of multifactorial targets among patients with ACS is suboptimal, particularly among patients with concomitant diabetes. The optimal measurement strategy post-discharge is essential for improving the comprehensive management of metabolic risk factors in ACS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56018,"journal":{"name":"Global Heart","volume":"20 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1400","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the achievement of metabolic risk factor targets and influencing factors in ACS patients with diabetes during the 12 months after discharge.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from the Chinese Cardiovascular Association database-iHeart Project. Patients who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of ACS between 2014 and 2021 and who had at least one measurement record of LDL-C, BP, or HbA1c within 12 months after discharge were included. We further stratified patients by diabetes status and analyzed the correlation between clinical characteristics, measurement strategy, and achievement of targets.
Results: Diabetes was identified in 1,027 (27.5%) of the eligible patients. The proportions of patients with diabetes achieving targets of LDL-C, BP, and HbA1c levels were 42.4%, 61.5%, and 43.7%, respectively. However, combined achievement rate was significantly lower in patients with diabetes than patients without diabetes (16.6% vs. 26.6%). Patients with diabetes who underwent the first measurement within three months or had ≥3 measurements within 12 months were positively associated with achieving combined targets.
Conclusions: The achievement of multifactorial targets among patients with ACS is suboptimal, particularly among patients with concomitant diabetes. The optimal measurement strategy post-discharge is essential for improving the comprehensive management of metabolic risk factors in ACS patients.
Global HeartMedicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍:
Global Heart offers a forum for dialogue and education on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programs related to the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) worldwide, with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Manuscripts should address not only the extent or epidemiology of the problem, but also describe interventions to effectively control and prevent CVDs and the underlying factors. The emphasis should be on approaches applicable in settings with limited resources.
Economic evaluations of successful interventions are particularly welcome. We will also consider negative findings if important. While reports of hospital or clinic-based treatments are not excluded, particularly if they have broad implications for cost-effective disease control or prevention, we give priority to papers addressing community-based activities. We encourage submissions on cardiovascular surveillance and health policies, professional education, ethical issues and technological innovations related to prevention.
Global Heart is particularly interested in publishing data from updated national or regional demographic health surveys, World Health Organization or Global Burden of Disease data, large clinical disease databases or registries. Systematic reviews or meta-analyses on globally relevant topics are welcome. We will also consider clinical research that has special relevance to LMICs, e.g. using validated instruments to assess health-related quality-of-life in patients from LMICs, innovative diagnostic-therapeutic applications, real-world effectiveness clinical trials, research methods (innovative methodologic papers, with emphasis on low-cost research methods or novel application of methods in low resource settings), and papers pertaining to cardiovascular health promotion and policy (quantitative evaluation of health programs.