Shortcomings in reporting country-level participation in multicenter randomized controlled trials involving Ireland as a collaborating partner: a metaresearch study

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111728
James Larkin , Uchechukwu Alanza , Vikneswaran Raj Nagarajan , Maurice Collins , Sami Termanini , Emmet Farrington , Barbara Clyne , Tom Fahey , Frank Moriarty
{"title":"Shortcomings in reporting country-level participation in multicenter randomized controlled trials involving Ireland as a collaborating partner: a metaresearch study","authors":"James Larkin ,&nbsp;Uchechukwu Alanza ,&nbsp;Vikneswaran Raj Nagarajan ,&nbsp;Maurice Collins ,&nbsp;Sami Termanini ,&nbsp;Emmet Farrington ,&nbsp;Barbara Clyne ,&nbsp;Tom Fahey ,&nbsp;Frank Moriarty","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><div>Multi-center randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide vital information about healthcare interventions. Reporting on country-level participation is important for understanding the context of multicenter RCTs. This study aimed to examine multicenter RCT reporting of country-level participation, using Ireland as a case study.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><div>This meta-research study included RCTs identified in a previous study of Irish RCTs. The previous study involved searching six databases (inception-2018) for RCTs with participants recruited in Ireland: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. This current study focuses on multicenter RCTs conducted on humans in healthcare settings with &lt;80% of participants recruited in Ireland. Outcome variables were trial characteristics and reporting rates for several variables, including the number of Irish centers, number of participants recruited in Ireland, and reporting the use of relevant reporting guidelines. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 239 RCTs were included. The most common intervention was a drug (74.9% of RCTs). The most common clinical domain was the cardiovascular system (18.0%). The number of Irish centers was reported in 75.3% of RCTs and the number of participants recruited in Ireland in 27.2%. Among RCTs that were published after the Consolidated Standards of Reporting in Trials (CONSORT) reporting guideline was published, 8.3% reported using a relevant reporting guideline.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings show deficits in reporting for multicenter RCTs, particularly in reporting the number of participants in Ireland and reporting the use of relevant reporting guidelines. The development of a multicenter trial extension to existing reporting guidelines may partly address country-level reporting issues.</div></div><div><h3>Plain Language Summary</h3><div>A randomized controlled trial is a way of assessing the benefits of a medical intervention (like a treatment for a health issue). Randomized trials have at least two different treatment groups. The people taking part are put into one of the groups at random. This process is called “randomization” and is usually done by a computer. These trials are often conducted with people recruited from multiple countries, and Ireland is a country that sometimes plays a role. The key details about trials, such as the number of participants from each country, are often missing from publications related to trials. Information about the number of participants from each country is important, because it shows how applicable the results are to that country or similar countries. We want to find out if trials involving Ireland provide details of how many people from Ireland or how many healthcare centers in Ireland took part in the trial. We did this by looking through the researchers' main publication about the trials and seeing what information they reported. We found 239 trials published between 1968 and 2019, and among those, only 27% detailed the number of participants in Ireland. Three-quarters (75%) of the trials detailed the number of Irish healthcare centers involved. Some researchers are developing a checklist for how to report details of trials conducted across multiple countries; this may help address the shortcomings in the reporting discussed above. In general, those who fund research, publish research, regulate research, and employ researchers need to ensure there are adequate rules and incentives in place so that all relevant information about a trial is published.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 111728"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435625000617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Multi-center randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide vital information about healthcare interventions. Reporting on country-level participation is important for understanding the context of multicenter RCTs. This study aimed to examine multicenter RCT reporting of country-level participation, using Ireland as a case study.

Study Design and Setting

This meta-research study included RCTs identified in a previous study of Irish RCTs. The previous study involved searching six databases (inception-2018) for RCTs with participants recruited in Ireland: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. This current study focuses on multicenter RCTs conducted on humans in healthcare settings with <80% of participants recruited in Ireland. Outcome variables were trial characteristics and reporting rates for several variables, including the number of Irish centers, number of participants recruited in Ireland, and reporting the use of relevant reporting guidelines. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

Results

Overall, 239 RCTs were included. The most common intervention was a drug (74.9% of RCTs). The most common clinical domain was the cardiovascular system (18.0%). The number of Irish centers was reported in 75.3% of RCTs and the number of participants recruited in Ireland in 27.2%. Among RCTs that were published after the Consolidated Standards of Reporting in Trials (CONSORT) reporting guideline was published, 8.3% reported using a relevant reporting guideline.

Conclusion

Our findings show deficits in reporting for multicenter RCTs, particularly in reporting the number of participants in Ireland and reporting the use of relevant reporting guidelines. The development of a multicenter trial extension to existing reporting guidelines may partly address country-level reporting issues.

Plain Language Summary

A randomized controlled trial is a way of assessing the benefits of a medical intervention (like a treatment for a health issue). Randomized trials have at least two different treatment groups. The people taking part are put into one of the groups at random. This process is called “randomization” and is usually done by a computer. These trials are often conducted with people recruited from multiple countries, and Ireland is a country that sometimes plays a role. The key details about trials, such as the number of participants from each country, are often missing from publications related to trials. Information about the number of participants from each country is important, because it shows how applicable the results are to that country or similar countries. We want to find out if trials involving Ireland provide details of how many people from Ireland or how many healthcare centers in Ireland took part in the trial. We did this by looking through the researchers' main publication about the trials and seeing what information they reported. We found 239 trials published between 1968 and 2019, and among those, only 27% detailed the number of participants in Ireland. Three-quarters (75%) of the trials detailed the number of Irish healthcare centers involved. Some researchers are developing a checklist for how to report details of trials conducted across multiple countries; this may help address the shortcomings in the reporting discussed above. In general, those who fund research, publish research, regulate research, and employ researchers need to ensure there are adequate rules and incentives in place so that all relevant information about a trial is published.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在涉及爱尔兰作为合作伙伴的多中心随机对照试验中报告国家层面参与的缺陷:一项元研究研究。
背景和目的:多中心随机对照试验(RCTs)提供了有关医疗保健干预措施的重要信息。报告国家层面的参与情况对于理解多中心随机对照试验的背景非常重要。本研究旨在以爱尔兰为例,研究国家层面参与的多中心随机对照试验报告。研究设计和设置:这是一项荟萃研究,包括在之前的爱尔兰随机对照试验研究中发现的随机对照试验。之前的研究涉及在六个数据库(inception-2018)中搜索爱尔兰招募的参与者的随机对照试验:PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychINFO和Cochrane对照试验登记册。目前的研究重点是在医疗机构中对人类进行的多中心随机对照试验,结果如下:总共纳入239项随机对照试验。最常见的干预措施是药物(74.9%的rct)。最常见的临床领域是心血管系统(18.0%)。75.3%的随机对照试验报告了爱尔兰中心的数量,27.2%的随机对照试验报告了在爱尔兰招募的参与者数量。在CONSORT报告指南发表后发表的rct中,8.3%的rct报告使用了相关的报告指南。结论:我们的研究结果显示了多中心随机对照试验报告的缺陷,特别是在爱尔兰报告参与者数量和报告相关报告指南的使用方面。在现有报告准则基础上发展多中心试点,可能部分解决国家一级的报告问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence and large language models for interview transcription in qualitative research: competency, politeness, and ethical implications Practical elements to consider when emulating a target trial Crossing the null does not mean “no effect”: a survey of internal medicine physicians on the interpretation of effect estimates with wide confidence intervals Rethinking clinical trials in the multimorbidity era: the imperative for patient-centered tailored approaches Depression rating scales demonstrate significant correlations but systematic differences: a multicenter prospective cohort study using equipercentile linking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1