Navigating Disparities: An In-depth Analysis of Perceived Competency Importance and Training Discrepancies in Clinical Placements among Students and Clinical Nurses.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING Asian Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.anr.2025.01.003
Su Hyun Kim, Dayeong Kim, Sunyoung Lee, Sojeong Lee, Hyunjee Lee, Hyewon Jeon, Geun-Hee Kim
{"title":"Navigating Disparities: An In-depth Analysis of Perceived Competency Importance and Training Discrepancies in Clinical Placements among Students and Clinical Nurses.","authors":"Su Hyun Kim, Dayeong Kim, Sunyoung Lee, Sojeong Lee, Hyunjee Lee, Hyewon Jeon, Geun-Hee Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.anr.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the perceived importance and training of competencies during nursing clinical placements by examining the perspectives of nursing students and clinical nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using an online survey of 351 nursing students and 247 clinical nurses. We utilized the Borich needs assessment model to identify the perceived importance and training of competencies during clinical placement. Students and nurses rated their perceived importance and training levels on 32 competency items regarding direct nursing care, indirect nursing care, decision-making and problem-solving, attitude, and nursing professionalism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students and clinical nurses identified nursing handovers, nursing records, crisis coping abilities, clinical problem identification, clinical decision making, and priority setting in nursing as competencies of greater importance and with more significant discrepancies from training during clinical placements (Quadrant I in the locus for focus model). Clinical nurses reported examination, skin integrity management, and communication with medical staff as having higher importance and greater discrepancies from training (Quadrant I). In contrast, students recognized them as having lower importance and higher discrepancies (Quadrant II). For students, the perceived importance of all competence domains was significantly associated with the corresponding training (Spearman's rho = .30-.56, p < .01). For clinical nurses, only the perceived importance of nursing professionalism was associated with all training domains (Spearman's rho = approximately .14-.20, p < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The disparities between students' and nurses' perceptions of the importance and training of competencies during clinical placements highlight the need to modify the clinical nursing education system.</p>","PeriodicalId":55450,"journal":{"name":"Asian Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2025.01.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the perceived importance and training of competencies during nursing clinical placements by examining the perspectives of nursing students and clinical nurses.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using an online survey of 351 nursing students and 247 clinical nurses. We utilized the Borich needs assessment model to identify the perceived importance and training of competencies during clinical placement. Students and nurses rated their perceived importance and training levels on 32 competency items regarding direct nursing care, indirect nursing care, decision-making and problem-solving, attitude, and nursing professionalism.

Results: Students and clinical nurses identified nursing handovers, nursing records, crisis coping abilities, clinical problem identification, clinical decision making, and priority setting in nursing as competencies of greater importance and with more significant discrepancies from training during clinical placements (Quadrant I in the locus for focus model). Clinical nurses reported examination, skin integrity management, and communication with medical staff as having higher importance and greater discrepancies from training (Quadrant I). In contrast, students recognized them as having lower importance and higher discrepancies (Quadrant II). For students, the perceived importance of all competence domains was significantly associated with the corresponding training (Spearman's rho = .30-.56, p < .01). For clinical nurses, only the perceived importance of nursing professionalism was associated with all training domains (Spearman's rho = approximately .14-.20, p < .05).

Conclusions: The disparities between students' and nurses' perceptions of the importance and training of competencies during clinical placements highlight the need to modify the clinical nursing education system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Asian Nursing Research is the official peer-reviewed research journal of the Korean Society of Nursing Science, and is devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will contribute to the body of nursing science and inform the practice of nursing, nursing education, administration, and history, on health issues relevant to nursing, and on the testing of research findings in practice.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting model for delirium after stroke. Influencing factors of frailty in older patients with chronic heart failure: Based on Bayesian network. Navigating Disparities: An In-depth Analysis of Perceived Competency Importance and Training Discrepancies in Clinical Placements among Students and Clinical Nurses. Factors associated with readmission in patients with left ventricular assist devices in South Korea. Comparative analysis of differences in functional ability among older people between urban and rural areas: a cross-sectional study from China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1