Could a focus on care process put care back into the US health system?

IF 2.7 Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf022
Arnav Shah, Reginald Reggie D Williams
{"title":"Could a focus on care process put care back into the US health system?","authors":"Arnav Shah, Reginald Reggie D Williams","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US health care system continues to underperform compared with other high-income countries, despite excelling on measures of care delivery and quality, also referred to as indicators of \"care process.\" This commentary explores how the United States managed to perform well on measures of care process and how learning from this lone area of positive cross-country comparison can provide valuable lessons for improving overall health care system performance. By applying these lessons, the United States can create a more effective, efficient, and equitable health care system, ensuring better access, streamlined administration, and improved health outcomes for more Americans.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 2","pages":"qxaf022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The US health care system continues to underperform compared with other high-income countries, despite excelling on measures of care delivery and quality, also referred to as indicators of "care process." This commentary explores how the United States managed to perform well on measures of care process and how learning from this lone area of positive cross-country comparison can provide valuable lessons for improving overall health care system performance. By applying these lessons, the United States can create a more effective, efficient, and equitable health care system, ensuring better access, streamlined administration, and improved health outcomes for more Americans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对护理过程的关注能否将护理重新纳入美国的医疗体系?
与其他高收入国家相比,美国的医疗保健系统仍然表现不佳,尽管在医疗服务和质量方面表现出色,也被称为“护理过程”指标。这篇评论探讨了美国如何在护理过程的措施上表现良好,以及如何从这一单一领域的积极的跨国比较中吸取教训,为改善整体卫生保健系统的绩效提供宝贵的经验。通过应用这些经验教训,美国可以建立一个更有效、更高效、更公平的医疗保健系统,确保更多美国人获得更好的服务,简化管理,改善健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Progress towards Healthy People 2030 population health goals. Patient perspectives on cost and quality measures in value-based cancer care. Impact of US government funding freezes on the HIV response: findings from a rapid survey in 32 countries. The equity catastrophe: how securitized financing collapses essential care during health crises. The timeliness of health plan drug coverage policy changes to FDA label revisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1