Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of 20 Essential Oils and Their Combinations on Bacterial and Fungal Strains.

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2025-02-23 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.79499
Nihal Ezzariga, Abdellah Moukal, Ali Asdadi, Zohra Lemkhente, Fatima Moustaoui, Abderrazak Kaaya, Mohamed Aghrouch
{"title":"Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of 20 Essential Oils and Their Combinations on Bacterial and Fungal Strains.","authors":"Nihal Ezzariga, Abdellah Moukal, Ali Asdadi, Zohra Lemkhente, Fatima Moustaoui, Abderrazak Kaaya, Mohamed Aghrouch","doi":"10.7759/cureus.79499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Growing antibiotic resistance is driving the search for natural alternatives, such as essential oils (EOs), which are known for their antimicrobial properties. This study evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of 20 EOs on bacterial and fungal strains and the impact of their combinations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty EOs were selected to evaluate their antimicrobial potential in vitro. Stock solutions were prepared and tested on three bacterial strains (<i>Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli</i>, and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa)</i> and three yeast strains of the genus <i>Candida</i>. The antimicrobial activity of EOs was initially evaluated by aromatogram, making it possible to classify oils according to their effectiveness. The sensitivity of microorganisms to EOs was then determined by measuring the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). EO combination tests were also performed to detect synergistic or antagonistic effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tests revealed that <i>Origanum vulgare, Cymbopogon citratus,</i> and <i>Thymus leptobotrys</i> were particularly effective against Gram-positive bacteria and yeasts, while others, such as <i>Citrus limon</i>, showed negligible activity. The combinations of oils generally produced indifferent or antagonistic effects, especially against <i>P. aeruginosa.</i> Conclusion: The results could open new perspectives for natural antimicrobial treatments, thus contributing to the fight against antibiotic resistance. In addition, the study will highlight the importance of judicious use of EO combinations to avoid interactions that could compromise their effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 2","pages":"e79499"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.79499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Growing antibiotic resistance is driving the search for natural alternatives, such as essential oils (EOs), which are known for their antimicrobial properties. This study evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of 20 EOs on bacterial and fungal strains and the impact of their combinations.

Materials and methods: Twenty EOs were selected to evaluate their antimicrobial potential in vitro. Stock solutions were prepared and tested on three bacterial strains (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and three yeast strains of the genus Candida. The antimicrobial activity of EOs was initially evaluated by aromatogram, making it possible to classify oils according to their effectiveness. The sensitivity of microorganisms to EOs was then determined by measuring the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). EO combination tests were also performed to detect synergistic or antagonistic effects.

Results: Tests revealed that Origanum vulgare, Cymbopogon citratus, and Thymus leptobotrys were particularly effective against Gram-positive bacteria and yeasts, while others, such as Citrus limon, showed negligible activity. The combinations of oils generally produced indifferent or antagonistic effects, especially against P. aeruginosa. Conclusion: The results could open new perspectives for natural antimicrobial treatments, thus contributing to the fight against antibiotic resistance. In addition, the study will highlight the importance of judicious use of EO combinations to avoid interactions that could compromise their effectiveness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20种精油及其组合对细菌和真菌的抑菌活性评价。
导言:不断增长的抗生素耐药性正在推动人们寻找天然替代品,如以抗菌特性而闻名的精油(EOs)。本研究评价了20种EOs对细菌和真菌菌株的抗菌效果及其组合对细菌和真菌菌株的影响。材料与方法:选取20株体外抑菌活性物质进行抑菌活性评价。制备原液,对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌3株细菌和念珠菌3株酵母菌进行试验。精油的抗菌活性最初是通过芳香图来评估的,这使得根据其有效性对精油进行分类成为可能。然后通过测定最小抑菌浓度(MIC)和最小杀菌浓度(MBC)来测定微生物对EOs的敏感性。还进行了EO联合试验,以检测协同或拮抗作用。结果:测试显示,牛根、Cymbopogon citratus和胸腺对革兰氏阳性细菌和酵母特别有效,而其他的,如柑橘柠檬,表现出微不足道的活性。油的组合通常产生冷漠或拮抗作用,特别是对铜绿假单胞菌。结论:该研究结果为天然抗菌药物治疗开辟了新的思路,有助于对抗抗生素耐药性。此外,该研究将强调明智地使用EO组合的重要性,以避免可能影响其有效性的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Recurrence Three Decades After Nephrectomy Presenting With New-Onset Diabetes. Effectiveness of Microneedling With or Without Insulin in Patients With Acne: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Airway Management Challenges During General Anesthesia in a Patient With a Large Lingual Cavernous Hemangioma: A Case Report. Glutamatergic Enhancement Using As-Needed Dextromethorphan and Piracetam in a Stimulant-Partially Responsive Adult With ADHD: A Single-Case Report. Correction: New-Onset Tic Disorder Associated With Bupropion XL: A Rare Case.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1