Health professionals' use of smartphone apps for clients with low back pain: an observational study.

Claudia Didyk, Lucy Kate Lewis, Belinda Lange
{"title":"Health professionals' use of smartphone apps for clients with low back pain: an observational study.","authors":"Claudia Didyk, Lucy Kate Lewis, Belinda Lange","doi":"10.1017/S1463423625000209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to explore health professionals' use, barriers, confidence, and preferences for technology and smartphone apps to assist clients with self-managing low back pain (LBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective observational cross-sectional survey of registered Australian health professionals that managed clients with LBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 52 survey responses were included (mean age 43 ±13.8 years). Most did not personally use healthy lifestyle apps (60%) and did not recommend apps due to a lack of knowledge of app effectiveness (93%). The largest barrier to recommending apps was the potential for apps to be misused as a substitute to health professional diagnosis. Fifteen recommended smartphone apps (mean age 36 ±10.6 years) and were at least moderately confident in choosing/recommending apps (94%) and assessing app quality (80%). Those more likely to recommend apps personally used apps for healthy lifestyle behaviours (odds ratio (OR) 5.1 (p = 0.009)) were physiotherapists (OR 0.13 (p = 0.035) c/f chiropractors in their profession for <10 years (OR 8.6 (p = 0.015)) c/f >30 years. Increasing age decreased the odds (OR 0.94 (p = 0.013)) of recommending apps.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health professionals do not recommend LBP self-management apps due to a lack of knowledge of their effectiveness. Those that do recommend apps are confident with app choice, recommendation, and app quality assessment. Physiotherapists with <10 years' experience were most likely to recommend apps.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to explore health professionals' use, barriers, confidence, and preferences for technology and smartphone apps to assist clients with self-managing low back pain (LBP).

Methods: Prospective observational cross-sectional survey of registered Australian health professionals that managed clients with LBP.

Results: In total, 52 survey responses were included (mean age 43 ±13.8 years). Most did not personally use healthy lifestyle apps (60%) and did not recommend apps due to a lack of knowledge of app effectiveness (93%). The largest barrier to recommending apps was the potential for apps to be misused as a substitute to health professional diagnosis. Fifteen recommended smartphone apps (mean age 36 ±10.6 years) and were at least moderately confident in choosing/recommending apps (94%) and assessing app quality (80%). Those more likely to recommend apps personally used apps for healthy lifestyle behaviours (odds ratio (OR) 5.1 (p = 0.009)) were physiotherapists (OR 0.13 (p = 0.035) c/f chiropractors in their profession for <10 years (OR 8.6 (p = 0.015)) c/f >30 years. Increasing age decreased the odds (OR 0.94 (p = 0.013)) of recommending apps.

Conclusions: Health professionals do not recommend LBP self-management apps due to a lack of knowledge of their effectiveness. Those that do recommend apps are confident with app choice, recommendation, and app quality assessment. Physiotherapists with <10 years' experience were most likely to recommend apps.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生专业人员使用智能手机应用程序治疗腰痛患者:一项观察性研究。
目的:本研究旨在探讨卫生专业人员对技术和智能手机应用程序的使用、障碍、信心和偏好,以帮助客户自我管理腰痛(LBP)。方法:前瞻性观察横断面调查注册澳大利亚卫生专业人员管理的客户与LBP。结果:共纳入52份调查问卷,平均年龄(43±13.8岁)。大多数人没有亲自使用过健康生活方式应用(60%),并且由于缺乏对应用有效性的了解(93%)而不推荐应用。推荐应用程序的最大障碍是应用程序有可能被滥用为健康专业诊断的替代品。15个推荐的智能手机应用程序(平均年龄36±10.6岁),在选择/推荐应用程序(94%)和评估应用程序质量(80%)方面至少有中等信心。那些更有可能推荐应用程序个人使用应用程序的健康生活方式行为(比值比(OR) 5.1 (p = 0.009))是物理治疗师(OR 0.13 (p = 0.035)或从事其职业30年的脊医。年龄的增加降低了推荐应用程序的几率(OR 0.94 (p = 0.013))。结论:由于缺乏对LBP有效性的了解,卫生专业人员不推荐LBP自我管理应用程序。那些推荐应用的人对应用选择、推荐和应用质量评估都很有信心。物理治疗师与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the burden and inequality in the unmet need for hypertension and type 2 diabetes care using a care cascade framework in Tanzania, Lesotho, and South Africa. Free cessation aids and enhanced support for smoking cessation in disadvantaged smokers: a qualitative study of patient and provider insights. Adaptation of the mothers' breastfeeding empowerment scale to Turkish society. Evaluating the impact of a pilot social prescribing service for the armed forces community. Husband's knowledge on partner's reproductive rights and its associated factors in central Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1